References
- Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., Marino, J.-C., Kademian, S. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Teachers' use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1504-1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016. 1198059
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
- Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2022). Science practice- readiness: Novice elementary teachers' developing knowledge of science practices. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21698
- Brandwein, P. F., & Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry and Science in the Elementary School. Harvard University Press.
- Bruner, J. S. (1999). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.
- Chen, Y., & Terada, T. (2021). Development and validation of an observation-based protocol to measure the eight scientific practices of the next generation science standards in K-12 science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(10), 1489-1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21716
- Choi, M., & Choi, A. (2016). Analysis of activities in chemistry chapters of middle school science textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum: Focus on 8 science practices. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 60(6), 436-451. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.6.436
- Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (2012). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1086/591813
- Gonzalez-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953-982. https://doi.org/10. 1002/sce.21592 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21592
- Gray, R., & Kang, N.-H. (2014). The structure of scientific arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
- Jeon, Y. B., & Lee, Y. H. (2020). Analysis of the nature of science (NOS) in Integrated Science textbooks of the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 273-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.21796/jse.2020.44.3.273
- Kang, N.-H. (2017). Korean teachers' conceptions of models and modeling in science and science teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.1.0143
- Kang, N.-H., & Lee, E. M. (2013). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school physics textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.132
- Kang, N.-H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20013
- Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
- Kim, M., Hong, J., Kim, S.-H., & Lim. C.-S. (2017). Analysis of inquiry activities in the life science chapters of middle school science textbooks: Focusing on science process skills and 8 scientific practice. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.318
- Korean Ministry of Education (2015a). Science Curriculum. Sejong-si, South Korea: Author.
- Korean Ministry of Education (2015b). Curriculum Commentary. Sejong-si, South Korea: Author.
- Kuhn, T. E. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lee, J. & Choi, A. (2017). An analysis of 8 scientific practices included in the 2015 revised science curriculum and teaching-learning materials: Focusing on the integrated science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(17), 85-111.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC.: Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
- Ndumanya, E., Ramnarain, U., & Wu, H.-K. (2021). An analysis of selected south african grade 12 physical sciences textbooks for the inclusion of the NGSS science practices. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(3), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00169-z
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies. https://www.nextgenscience.org/standards/standards
- NGSS Lead States. (2016). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States (Vol. 2)(N.-H. Kang trans.). KOFAC (Original work published 2013).
- Null, W. (2016). Curriculum from Theory to Practice (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Oh, K., & Kang, N.-H. (2019). Participation patterns of elementary students in scientific problem finding activities. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0039-6
- Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191
- Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
- Park, S., Hwang, S., & Chung, S. (2022). Analysis of science core competencies in the biological diversity unit in accordance with the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction Education, 26(1), 1-12.
- Park, K., Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2014). The analysis of the aspects of science writing in high school science textbooks based on the 2009 revised national curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.2.344
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Song, N., Hong, J., & Noh, T. (2020). Analysis of external representations in matter units of 7 th grade science digital textbooks developed under the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 64(6), 416-428. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2020.64.6.416
- Song, J. & Na, J. (2015). Directions and issues of 2015 National Science Curriculum and their implications to science classroom culture. School Science Journal, 9(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.9.2.201507.72
- Yoon, G. M., & Hong, Y. (2021). A study on vocabulary and sentence level through readability analysis of 2015 Revised Elementary Science Textbook. Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2021.45.3.317