DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing the Online Learning Behaviors of Middle School Students in South Korea

한국 중학생의 온라인 학습 행동에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • Na, Kyoungsik (Konkuk University, Department of Library and Information Science) ;
  • Jeong, Yongsun (Dongshin University, Nursing Science)
  • Received : 2022.08.23
  • Accepted : 2022.09.08
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

This study presented the factor analysis on constructing the new factors affecting the middle school students' online learning behaviors from the questionnaires employed among middle school students. A total of 204 students participated and the data were collected in South Korea. The sample of middle school ninth-grade students was selected and used through purposive sampling. Findings from the factor analysis provided evidence for the eight-factor solution for the 35-items accounting for 66.15% of the shared variance. A wide range of factors has been considered to identify students' online learning behaviors. The appropriate experience and use of e-learning in the middle school period is also important as it will be a critical stepstone for future education. This research provides information that has been taken into account for advancing online learning to enhance the quality of e-learning systems for middle school students. The study results provided eight new factors affecting the middle school students' online learning behaviors; that is 1) communication using social media as a learning tool, 2) intention to share information using ICT, 3) addiction of technology, 4) adoption of technology, 5) seeking information using ICT, 6) use of social media learning, 7) information search using ICT, and 8) immersion of technology. This study confirmed that middle school students prefer communication using social media as a learning tool, and value intention to share information using ICT for the most part. The data obtained based on factor analysis can highlight the online learning behaviors towards a mixture of social media learning and ICT to ensure a new educational platform for the future of e-learning. This research expects to be useful for both middle schools of online learning to better understand students' online learning behaviors and design online learning environments and information professionals to better assist students who particularly need digital literacy.

본 연구에서는 중학생을 대상으로 중학생의 온라인 학습 행동에 영향을 미치는 새로운 요인을 구성하기 위한 요인분석을 제시하였다. 총 204명의 한국 중학생이 참여했으며, 중학교 3년 학생의 표본을 목적표본으로 선정하여 사용하였다. 요인 분석 결과는 공유 분산의 66.15%를 차지하는 35개 항목에 대한 8개 요인 솔루션을 제시했다. 중학생들의 온라인 학습 행동을 식별하기 위해 다양한 요인이 고려된다. 이때, 중학교 시기 온라인 러닝의 적절한 경험과 활용도는 그들의 미래 교육의 중요한 발판이 되기 때문에 중요하다. 본 연구의 결과는 중학생을 위한 온라인 러닝 시스템의 질을 향상시키고 온라인 학습을 발전시키기 위한 정보를 제공할 것으로 기대한다. 연구 결과는 중학생의 온라인 학습 행동에 영향을 미치는 8가지 중요한 요인을 제시했고, 그것들은 1) 소셜 미디어를 학습 도구로 활용한 커뮤니케이션, 2) ICT를 활용한 정보 공유 의지, 3) 테크놀러지 중독, 4) 테크놀러지 도입, 5) ICT를 활용한 정보 탐색, 6) 소셜 미디어 학습 활용, 7) ICT를 이용한 정보 검색, 그리고 8) 테크놀러지 몰입이다. 본 연구의 결과는 중학생들이 학습도구로 소셜미디어를 활용한 커뮤니케이션을 선호하며, ICT를 활용한 정보 공유 의도를 대부분 중시하고 있음을 확인하였다. 요인 분석을 기반으로 얻은 데이터는 온라인 러닝의 새로운 교육 플랫폼을 적용하기 위해, 소셜 미디어 학습과 ICT의 혼합에 대한 온라인 학습 행동에 중요하게 적용할 수 있을 것이다. 이 연구는 중학생들의 온라인 학습 행동을 더 잘 이해하고 온라인 학습 환경을 설계하는 정보 전문가가 특히 디지털 리터러시가 필요한 중학생에게 더 잘 지원할 수 있도록 유용하게 사용할 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683
  2. Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Obeidat, Z. M., & Al-dweeri, R. M. (2020). An empirical investigation into examination of factors influencing university students' behavior towards elearning acceptance using SEM approach. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(2), 19-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11115
  3. Ali, M. K. & Maksum, H. (2020). Utilization of E-Learning-Based ICT Learning using the Google Classroom application during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 373-380. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29181
  4. Ansari, J. A. N. & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
  5. Audrin, C. & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7395-7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5
  6. Blaschke, L. M. (2014). Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 22(0). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21635
  7. Briz, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes, J., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. (2016). Learning with mobile technologies - Students' behavior. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027
  8. Burford, S. & Park, S. (2014). The impact of mobile tablet devices on human information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 70(4), 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2012-0123
  9. Chen, G., Jin, Y., Liang, W., & Liu, Y. (2021). Study on the influence of middle school students' self-efficacy on the willingness to use online learning platform. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 0(0), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720920984030
  10. Chen, Z., Xu, M., Garrido, G., & Guthrie, M. W. (2020). Relationship between students' online learning behavior and course performance: what contextual information matters? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010138
  11. Dafoulas, G. A. & Shokri, A. (2014). Delivery of E-Learning through Social Learning Networks International Conference e-Learning 2014. Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 2014, https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157805
  12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Franke, T., Attig, C., & Wessel, D. (2019). A personal resource for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(6), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150
  14. Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923-6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
  15. Henson, R. K. & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
  16. Hong, J. C., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2021). High school students' online learning ineffectiveness in experimental courses during the COVID-19 pandemic [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738695
  17. Jin, F. & Divitini, M. (2020). Affinity for technology and teenagers' learning intentions. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406269
  18. Kolokytha, E., Loutrouki, S., Valsamidis, S., & Florou, G. (2015). Social media networks as a learning tool. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 287-295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00029-5
  19. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open, 5(1), 2158244015573169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169
  20. Liang, K., Zhang, Y., He, Y., Zhou, Y., Tan, W., & Li, X. (2017). Online behavior analysis-based student profile for intelligent e-learning. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017, 9720396. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9720396
  21. Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0301.08
  22. Luaran, J. E., Samsuri, N. N., Nadzri, F. A., & Rom, K. B. M. (2014). A study on the student's perspective on the effectiveness of using e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 139-144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1407
  23. Maes, E., Vanderoost, E., D'Hooge, R., De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2017). Individual difference factors in the learning and transfer of patterning discriminations [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01262
  24. Mills, L. & Knezek, G. (2012). Measuring Learning Preferences within the Integrated Communications Learning Landscape.
  25. Mills, L. A., Knezek, G. A., & Wakefield, J. S. (2013). Learning with social media: measurement tools for understanding information behavior in technology pervasive environments of the 21st century. In Paper presented at iConference 2013 proceedings, Fort Worth, TX., 593-600. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.9776/13286
  26. Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: the case of Youtube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
  27. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students' perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
  28. Na, K., Jeong, Y., & Yang, C. (2021). Exploring cognitive, affective, and physical aspects of early adolescents' health information seeking behaviors. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(2), 289-324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.2.289
  29. Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
  30. Paul, J. & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. Face-to-Face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016 [Original Research]. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007
  31. Pavel, A. P., Fruth, A., & Neacsu, M. N. (2015). ICT and e-learning: catalysts for innovation and quality in higher education. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 704-711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00409-8
  32. Qazi, A., Hardaker, G., Said Ahmad, I., Darwich, M., Maitama, J., & Ahad, A. D. (2021). The role of information & communication technology in elearning environments: a systematic review. IEEE Access, PP, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067042
  33. Razzaq, A., Samiha, Y. T., & Anshari, M. (2018). Smartphone habits and behaviors in supporting students self-efficacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(2), 94-109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7685
  34. Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 5243-5245). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
  35. Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11. http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajams/9/1/2 https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
  36. Song, Y., Yang, J., Fei, X., Ma, X., & Ma, D. (2018, 8-11 Aug. 2018). How does College Students' Online Learning Behavior Impact Their Academic Performance. 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE),
  37. Sukmanasa, W. (2022). The effect of digital literature on students' learning independence in the 2019 COVID situation. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 5, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v5i2.6000
  38. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
  39. Thai, N. T. T., Wever, B. d., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 36(3), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
  40. Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683
  41. Wei, H. C. & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
  42. Yan, S. (2021). COVID-19 and technology use by teenagers: a case study. Human Behavior with Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 185-193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.236
  43. Yang, C. & Hsieh, T. C. (2013). Regional differences of online learning behavior patterns. The Electronic Library, 31(2), 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471311312366
  44. Yu, T.-K., Lin, M.-L., & Liao, Y.-K. (2017). Understanding factors influencing information communication technology adoption behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav., 71(C), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.005
  45. Zawaideh, F. H. (2017). The effect of mobile learning on the development of the students' learning behaviors and performance at Jordanian university. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(3), 1-7.
  46. Zhang, X. (2016). An analysis of online students' behaviors on course sites and the effect on learning performance: a case study of four LIS online classes. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 57(4), 255-270.