DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

JIDB Development Tactics and Strategic Directions to be a Journal Indexed in SCOPUS and SSCI

  • KANG, Eungoo (Becamex School of Business, Eastern International University)
  • Received : 2022.09.28
  • Accepted : 2022.09.30
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The two (SCOPUS and SSCI) are the most reputed indexing databases in the world for social science area, and hence the most preferred by majority of researchers in filling the academia niche that may exist on any research topic This study aims to determine five key strategic tactics that the JIDB (Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business) can use to be indexed by SCOPUS and SSCI, following five main measures as discussed in main texts. Research design, data and methodology: The literature analysis which was selected by this study is appropriate to find out useful texts dataset and this analysis provides adequate evidence for previous literature collection. Results: From the current literature analysis, this study suggests five strategic tactics for JIDB to be a journal indexed in SCOPUS and SSCI. The five tactics are follows: (1) Understanding the Selection Process, (2) Content and Relevance, (3) Finding a Niche Technical Standards, (4) Clarity in Formatting and Structure, and (5) Citations and Publication Considerations. Conclusions: This study concludes that the five discussed tactics are all imperative in aiding the research and if JIDB follows all the select strategies, it will be bound to succeed for indexing in the two databases.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the research grant of the KODISA Scholarship Foundation in 2022.

References

  1. Gasparyan, A. Y., & Kitas, G. D. (2021). Editorial strategy to get a scholarly journal indexed by Scopus. Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology, 32(1), 1-2 https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.32.1.1
  2. Li, R. (2022). Research trends of blended language learning: A bibliometric synthesis of SSCI-indexed journal articles during 2000-2019. ReCALL, (January), 1-18.
  3. Liu, F., Guo, W., & Zuo, C. (2018). High impact factor journals have more publications than expected. Current science, 114(5), 955-956. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i05/955-956
  4. Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
  5. Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?. Journal of informetrics, 12(2), 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
  6. Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8