International journal of advanced smart convergence

  • 제11권3호
  • /
  • Pages.119-131
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2288-2847(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2855(eISSN)
한국인터넷방송통신학회 (The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Self-determination Degree Difference Analysis According to the Subject Selection Criteria of General High School Students

  • Kim, Eun-Mi (Education Assignment Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.06
  • 심사 : 2022.08.11
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference in the degree of self-determination between the criteria that general high school students consider important when selecting subjects (hereinafter referred to as 'importance') and the criteria that are actually applied when selecting subjects (hereinafter referred to as 'implementation'), based on the existing motivation type discrimination scale and subject selection criteria scale. As a result of analysis based on the data of a total of 786 high school students, the degree of self-determination was found to be different for all 34 questions and 8 factors in importance and implementation. In general, the questions and factors showed a simple structure with the motivation types and showed the lowest correlation with the motivations at both ends of the self-determination continuum. Among the factors that students consider important when selecting subjects and the factors that are actually applied, the 'SAT' factor showed the highest positive correlation with identification control. In addition, it was found that autonomous subject selection was more preferred than subject selection based on extrinsic motivation. These results are not only meaningful as the first study to analyze the degree of self-determination in the subject selection of high school students, but also can be used as useful data for customized subject selection guidance according to the degree of self-determination. The implications of this study and suggestions for follow-up studies were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.go.kr
  2. E.M. Kim, "Latent Profile Analysis According to the Subject Selection Criteria of General High School Students," International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT), Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 226-236,September 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2021.9.4.226
  3. A. Assor, G. Roth, & E.L. Deci, "The emotional costs of parents' conditional regard: A self- determination theory analysis," Journal of Personality, 72, pp. 47-88, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x
  4. B.K. Choi, W.P. Hong, "High school students' reasons for choosing elective courses and its impact on academic performances in college," Korean Journal of Educational Research,Vol.53, No.3, pp. 141-160, 2015
  5. Y. J. Kim, A Study on the Student's Choice Criteria in the Career Compatible Curriculum-High school student's choice criteria IPA, Graduate School Thesis, University of Korea, Seoul, Korea , 2017.
  6. H.G. Seo, S.H. Cha, "An Importance-Performance Analysis on Students' Selection Criteria of Elective Subjects in General High Schools Along with the Implementation of 2015 National Curriculum," Journal of Education & Culture, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 353-374, 2020. DOI: https:/ doi.org//10.24159/joec.2020.26.1.353
  7. M. Javed, "Investigating Factors Affecting Students' Subject Selection at secondary School Level," International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol.8, No.11, pp. 815-820, 2018. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.11.1145
  8. J.S. Lee, "Importance-performance analysis on Korean secondary English teachers' task-based language teaching," Secondary English Education, Vol.12, No.3, pp.175-200, 2019. DOI: 10.20487/kasee.12.3.201908.175
  9. B. G. Bak, J.U. Lee, S.P. Hong, "Reconstructing the classificatory pattern of learning motivation proposed by self-determination theory," The Korean Society of Educational Psychology, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 699-717, 2005.
  10. E. M. Kim, Q.Q. Li, B.G. Bak, "Scale Development and Profile Analysis of General High School Stude nts' Subject Selection Criteria," The Journal of Child Education, Vol.30, N0. 2, pp. 73-103. May 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17643/KJCE.2021.30.2.04
  11. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. 2015 Revised General Summary and Curriculum Application Plan, pp. 51-53, 2017.
  12. W.J. Woo, "A Study on the Successful Implementation and Settlement of High School Credit System: Analyzing the Impact of Prerequisites, External Environment, a nd Operational Modes," The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction (JLCCI), Vol. 19, No.10, pp. 311-330, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.10.311
  13. E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan, "The 'what' and the 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior," Psychological Inquiry, 11, pp. 227-268, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  14. T. Hayamizu. "Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination," Japanese psychological Research, Vol. 39, No.2, pp. 98-108, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00043