Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.101-113
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic response of single-arch large-span fabricated subway station structure

  • He, Huafei (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University) ;
  • Li, Zhaoping (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.22
  • 심사 : 2022.07.22
  • 발행 : 2022.07.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A new type of fabricated subway station construction technology can effectively solve these problems. For a new type of metro structure form, it is necessary to clarify its mechanical properties, especially the seismic performance. A soil-structure elastoplastic finite element model is established to perform three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis based on the first fabricated station structure-Yuanjiadian station of Changchun Metro Line 2, China. Firstly, the nonlinear seismic response characteristics of the fabricated and cast-in-place subway stations under different seismic wave excitations are compared and analyzed. Then, a comprehensive analysis of several important parameters that may affect the seismic response of fabricated subway stations is given. The results show that the maximum plastic strain, the interlayer deformation, and the internal force of fabricated station structures are smaller than that of cast-in-place structure, which indicates that the fabricated station structure has good deformation coordination capability and mechanical properties. The seismic responses of fabricated stations were mainly affected by the soil-structure stiffness ratio, the soil inertia effect, and earthquake load conditions rarely mentioned in cast-in-place stations. The critical parameters have little effect on the interlayer deformation but significantly affect the joints' opening distance and contact stress, which can be used as the evaluation index of the seismic performance of fabricated station structures. The presented results can better understand the seismic responses and guide the seismic design of the fabricated station.

키워드

과제정보

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51678033), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. C20JB500160). Their supports are gratefully acknowledged.

참고문헌

  1. Ammanagi, S. and Manohar, C.S. (2015), "Optimal input crosspower spectra in shake table testing of asymmetric structures", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 1115-1132. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1115.
  2. An, J., Tao, L., Jiang, L. and Yan, H. (2021), "A shaking table based experimental study of seismic response of shield enlarge dig type's underground subway station in liquefiable ground", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 147, 106621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106621.
  3. An, X.A., Shawky, A.A. and Maekawa, K. (1997), "The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin earthquake", Cement Concrete Compos., 19(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00014-0.
  4. Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K., and Lin, C.H. (2000), EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent-linear Earthquake site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.
  5. Beiraghi, H. (2019), "Fragility assessment of shear walls coupled with buckling restrained braces subjected to near field earthquakes", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.3.389.
  6. Chen, Z., Chen, W., Li, Y., and Yuan, Y. (2016), "Shaking table test of a multi story subway station under pulse like ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 82, 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.002.
  7. Ding, P., Tao, L., Yang, X., Zhao, J. and Shi, C. (2019), "Three dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station", Sustain. Cities Soc., 45, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.010.
  8. Du, X., Wang, Z. and Liu, H. (2021), "Numerical study of self centering concrete wall system under cyclic loading", J. Build. Eng., 41, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102409.
  9. Gazetas, G., Gerolymos, N. and Anastasopoulos, I. (2005), "Response of three Athens metro underground structures in the 1999 Parnitha earthquake", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25(7-10), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.006.
  10. Haiyang, Z., Jing, Y., Su, C., Jisai, F., and Guoxing, C. (2019), "Seismic performance of underground subway station structure considering connection modes and diaphragm wall", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 127, 105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105842.
  11. Hashash, Y.M., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B. John, I. and Yao, C. (2001), "Seismic design and analysis of underground structures", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 16(4), 247-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7.
  12. Huh, J, Tran, Q.H., Haldar, A., Park, I. and Ahn, J.H. (2017), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of a shallow two story underground RC box structure", Appl. Sci., 7(7), 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070735.
  13. Huo, H., Bobet, A., Fernandez, G. and Ramirez, J. (2005). "Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground: evaluation of the failure of the daikai station", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 131(12), 1522-1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1522).
  14. Iida, H., Hiroto, T., Yoshida, N. and Iwafuji, M. (1996), "Damage to Daikai subway station", Soils Found., 36(Special), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.Special_283.
  15. Kim, Y., Lim, H. and Jeong, S (2020), "Seismic response of vertical shafts in multi-layered soil using dynamic and pseudo static analyses", Geom. Eng., 21(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.3.267.
  16. Li, Z.P., Wang, C., Su, H.F. and Shi, S. and Wang, P. (2015a), "Mechanical property of tenon-groove joints for metro station constructed by prefabricated structure", China Railway Sci., 36(5), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2015.05.02.
  17. Li, Z.P., Wang, C., Su, H.F. and Shi, S.F. (2015b), "An experiment Study on the evolution law of concrete structure crack and joint seam deformation for tenon groove joints in the prefabricated metro station", China Civil Eng. J., 48(S1), 409-413.
  18. Liu, J., Du, Y., Du, X., Wang, Z. and Wu, J. (2006), "3D viscousspring artificial boundary in time domain", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 5(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0585-2.
  19. Liu, H., Xu, C. and Du, X. (2020), "Seismic response analysis of assembled monolithic subway station in the transverse direction", Eng. Struct., 219, 110970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110970.
  20. Ma, C., Lu, D. and Du, X. (2018). "Seismic performance upgrading for underground structures by introducing sliding isolation bearings", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 74, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.007.
  21. Maleki, M., Bidgoli, M.R. and Kolahchi, R. (2019), "Earthquake response of nanocomposite concrete pipes conveying and immersing in fluid using numerical methods", Comput. Concrete, 24(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.2.125.
  22. Moayedifar, A. Nejati, H.R., Goshtasbi K. and Khosrotash, M. (2019), "Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)" Earthq. Struct., 16(6), 705-714. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.705.
  23. Parra-Montesinos, G.J., Bobet, A. and Ramirez, J.A. (2006), "Evaluation of soil structure interaction and structural collapse in Daikai subway station during Kobe earthquake", Aci Struct. J., 103(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.14359/15092.
  24. Qiu, D., Chen, J. and Xu, Q. (2019a), "3-D numerical analysis on seismic responses of the underground large scale frame structure under near-fault ground motions", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 91, 103020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103020.
  25. Qiu, D., Chen, J. and Xu, Q. (2019b). "Comparative numerical analysis on dynamic effects of underground large scale frame structures under seismic waves", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 83, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.012.
  26. Rossi, M., Calderini, C., Roselli, I., Mongelli, M., De Canio, G. and Lagomarsino, S. (2020), "Seismic analysis of a masonry cross vault through shaking table tests: the case study of the Dey Mosque in Algiers", Earthq. Struct., 18(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.1.057.
  27. Tao, L., Ding, P., Shi, C., Wu, X., Wu, S. and Li, S. (2019), "Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 91, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.102994.
  28. Tao, L., Ding, P., Yang, X., Lin, P., Shi, C., Bao, Y., Wei, P. and Zhao, J. (2020), "Comparative study of the seismic performance of prefabricated and cast in place subway station structures by shaking table test", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 105, 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103583.
  29. Wang, W.L., Wang, T.T., Su, J.J., Lin, C.H., Seng, C.R. and Huang, T.H. (2001), "Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi Chi earthquake", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 16(3), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5.
  30. Wang, J., Liu, H., Liu, H. and Zou, Y. (2019), "Centrifuge model study on the seismic responses of shield tunnel", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 92, 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103036.
  31. Xu, Z., Du, X., Xu, C., Hao, H., Bi, K. and Jiang, J. (2019), "Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 116, 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9790-6.
  32. Yu, R.F., Abduwaris, A. and Yu, Y.X (2020), "Practical coherency model suitable for near- and far field earthquakes based on the effect of source-to-site distance on spatial variations in ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 73(6), 651-666.
  33. Zhuang, H., Hu, Z., Wang, X. and Chen, G. (2015), "Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling", B. Earthq. Eng., 13(12), 3645-3668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9790-6.