Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance of a building base-isolated by TFP susceptible to pound with a surrounding moat wall

  • Received : 2021.08.22
  • Accepted : 2022.07.20
  • Published : 2022.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Limiting the displacement of seismic isolators causes a pounding phenomenon under severe earthquakes. Therefore, the ASCE 7-16 has provided minimum criteria for the design of the isolated building. In this research the seismic response of isolated buildings by Triple Friction Pendulum Isolator (TFPI) under the impact, expected, and unexpected mass eccentricity was evaluated. Also, the effect of different design parameters on the seismic behavior of structural and nonstructural elements was found. For this, a special steel moment frame structure with a surrounding moat wall was designed according to the criteria, by considering different response modification coefficients (RI), and 20% mass eccentricity in one direction. Then, different values of these parameters and the damping of the base isolation were evaluated. The results show that the structural elements have acceptable behavior after impact, but the nonstructural components are placed in a moderate damage range after impact and the used improved methods could not ameliorate the level of damage. The reduction in the RI and the enhancement of the isolator's damping are beneficial up to a certain point for improving the seismic response after impact. The moat wall reduces torque and maximum absolute acceleration (MAA) due to unexpected enhancement of mass eccentricity. However, drifts of some stories increase. Also, the difference between the response of story drift by expected and unexpected mass eccentricity is less. This indicates that the minimum requirement displacement according to ASCE 7-16 criteria lead to acceptable results under the unexpected enhancement of mass eccentricity.

Keywords

References

  1. Adzehemyan, A., Benzoni, G. and Lomiento, G. (2019), "Experimental model for double concave sliding bearings", Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures, St.Petersburg, Russia, July.
  2. AISC 341 (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-16), American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  3. AISC 360 (2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16), American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  4. Alhan, C. and Oncu-Davas, S. (2016), "Performance limits of seismically isolated buildings under near-field earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 116, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.043.
  5. Almazan, J.L. and De la Llera, J.C. (2002), "Analytical model of structures with frictional pendulum isolators", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(2), 305-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.110.
  6. Almazan, J.L. and De La LLera, J.C. (2003), "Accidental torsion due to overturning in nominally symmetric structures isolated with the FPS", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(6), 919-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.255.
  7. Amiri, G.G., Shakouri, A., Veismoradi, S. and Namiranian, P. (2017), "Effect of seismic pounding on buildings isolated by triple friction pendulum bearing", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.035.
  8. ASCE 7-05 (2006), Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05), American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  9. ASCE 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  10. ASCE 7-16 (2017), Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16), American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  11. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1486-1501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
  12. Bao, Y., Becker, T.C. (2018a), "Effect of design methodology on collapse of friction pendulum isolated moment resisting and concentrically braced Frames", J. Struct. Eng., 144(11), 04018203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002183.
  13. Bao, Y. and Becker, T.C. (2018b), "Inelastic response of baseisolated structures subjected to impact", Eng. Struct., 171, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.091.
  14. Bianco, V., Bernardini, D., Mollaioli, F. and Monti, G. (2019), "Modelling of the temperature rises in multiple friction pendulum bearings by means of thermo-mechanical rheological elements", Archiv. Civ. Mech. Eng., 19(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.09.007.
  15. Bianco, V., Monti, G., Belfiore, N.P. and Vailati, M. (2021a), "Multibody kinematics of the double concave curved surface sliders, from supposed compliant sliding to suspected stick slip", Pract. Period. Struct. Design Constr., 26(3), 04021024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000581.
  16. Bianco, V., Monti, G. and Belfiore, N.P. (2021b), "Advanced multi body modelling of DCCSS isolators, geometrical compatibility and kinematics", Buildings, 11(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020050.
  17. Constantinou, M.C., Kalpakidis, I., Filiatrault, A. and Ecker Lay, R.A. (2011), "LRFD based analysis and design procedures for bridge bearings and seismic isolators", Technical Report No. MCEER-11-0004; State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.
  18. Dhankot, M.A. and Soni, D.P. (2017), "Behaviour of triple friction pendulum isolator under forward directivity and fling step effect", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 21(3), 872-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0690-3.
  19. De Domenico, D., Gandelli, E. and Quaglini, V. (2020), "Effective base isolation combining low-friction curved surface sliders and hysteretic gap dampers", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 130, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105989.
  20. FEMA-NIBS (2003), Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology - earthquake model (HAZUS-MH MR4), Technical Manual Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Sciences; Washington DC, U.S.A.
  21. Fenz, D.M. and Constantinou, M.C. (2008a), "Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior, experimental verification", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(2), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.751.
  22. Fenz, D.M. and Constantinou, M.C. (2008b), "Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior, experimental verification", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.750.
  23. Fenz, D.M. and Constantinou, M.C. (2008c), "Modeling triple friction pendulum bearings for response-history analysis", Earthq. Spectra., 24(4), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2982531.
  24. Ismail, M., Rodellar, J. and Pozo, F. (2015), "Passive and hybrid mitigation of potential near-fault inner pounding of a selfbraking seismic isolator", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 69, 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.019.
  25. Kitayama, S. and Constantinou, M.C. (2018), "Collapse performance of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7", Eng. Struct., 164, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.008.
  26. Kitayama, S. and Constantinou, M.C. (2019), "Effect of displacement restraint on the collapse performance of seismically isolated buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(5), 2767-2786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00554-y.
  27. Komodromos, P., Polycarpou, P.C., Papaloizou, L. and Phocas, M.C. (2007), "Response of seismically isolated buildings considering poundings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1605-1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.692.
  28. Kuvat, A. and Sadoglu, E. (2020), "Dynamic properties of sand bitumen mixtures as a geotechnical seismic isolation material", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 132, 106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106043.
  29. Lomiento, G., Bonessio, N. and Benzoni, G. (2013), "Friction model for sliding bearings under seismic excitation". J. Earthq. Eng., 17(8), 1162-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.814611.
  30. Mahmoud, S. and Jankowski, R. (2010), "Pounding involved response of isolated and non-isolated buildings under earthquake excitation", Earthq. Struct., 1(3), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.3.231.
  31. Masroor, A. and Mosqueda, G. (2012), "Experimental simulation of base isolated buildings pounding against moat wall and effects on superstructure response", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(14), 2093-2109. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2177.
  32. Masroor, A. and Mosqueda, G. (2015), "Assessing the collapse probability of base isolated buildings considering pounding to moat walls using the FEMA P695 methodology", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 2069-2086. https://doi.org/10.1193/092113EQS256M.
  33. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2003), "Seismic response of base isolated structures during impact with adjacent structures", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1311-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00081-6.
  34. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2004), "Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures", Eng. Struct., 26(12), 1735-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.011.
  35. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2010), "Impact response of torsionally coupled base isolated structures", J. Vib. Control., 16(11), 1623-1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309103271.
  36. Mavronicola, E.A., Polycarpou, P.C. and Komodromos, P. (2017), "Spatial seismic modeling of base isolated buildings pounding against moat walls, effects of ground motion directionality and mass eccentricity", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(7), 1161-1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.285.
  37. Mavronicola, E.A., Polycarpou, P.C. and Komodromos, P. (2020), "Effect of ground motion directionality on the seismic response of base isolated buildings pounding against adjacent structures", Eng. Struct., 207, 110202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110202.
  38. Mazza, F. (2019), "In plane out of plane non linear model of masonry infills in the seismic analysis of rc framed buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 48(4), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3143.
  39. Mazza, F. and Labernarda, R. (2020), "Magnetic damped links to reduce internal seismic pounding in base isolated buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18(15), 6795-6824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00961-6.
  40. Mazza, F. (2021), "Base isolation of a hospital pavilion against in plane out of plane seismic collapse of masonry infills", Eng. Struct., 228, 111504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111504.
  41. McVitty, W.J. and Constantinou, M.C. (2015), "Property modification factors for seismic isolators, design guidance for buildings", Technical Report No. MCEER-15-0005; State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.
  42. Pant, D.R. and Wijeyewickrema, A.C. (2012a), "Influence of near fault ground motions and seismic pounding on the response of base Isolated Buildings reinforcement concrete buildings", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering and 4th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, March.
  43. Pant, D.R. and Wijeyewickrema, A.C. (2012b), "Structural performance of a base-isolated reinforced concrete building subjected to seismic pounding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(12), 1709-1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2158.
  44. PEER (2019), PEER Ground Motion Database; Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
  45. SAP2000 (2009), Integrated Solution for Structural Analysis and Design; Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), Berkeley, CA, U.S.A. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000
  46. Sarlis, A.A. and Constantinou, M.C. (2010), "Modeling triple friction pendulum isolators in program SAP2000", supplement to Technical Report No. MCEER 05-009; State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.
  47. SEAOC (2014), 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual Volume 5: Examples for Seismically Isolated Buildings and Buildings with Supplemental Damping, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA, U.S.A.
  48. Tajammolian, H., Khoshnoudian, F., Rad, A.R. and Loghman, V. (2018), "Seismic fragility assessment of asymmetric structures supported on TCFP bearings subjected to near field earthquakes", Structures, 13, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.11.004.
  49. Vaiana, N., Sessa, S., Paradiso, M. and Rosati, L. (2019), "Accurate and efficient modeling of the hysteretic behavior of sliding bearings", Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece, June.