Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconsiderations of the Intermediary Organization for Urban Regeneration 2.0 in Seoul - Focused on the Factors Affecting Sustainability of the Intermediary Organization -

서울시 도시재생 2.0을 위한 중간지원조직 역할의 재검토 - 중간지원조직 지속성 담보에 영향을 미치는 요인분석을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2022.04.12
  • Accepted : 2022.07.20
  • Published : 2022.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the announcement of Urban Regeneration 2.0 in Seoul, the Seoul urban regeneration project is taking a new turn. This study aims to make suggestions regarding directional moves for Seoul's intermediary organization. The interview data limited to the answers involving the problems and limitations of the intermediary organization of the Seoul Package Lab proceeded by the Seoul Metropolitan Council were reanalyzed. Based on this database, five factors that influenced securing sustainability of the intermediary organization were identified; Suwon Sustainable City Foundation was suggested as an alternative case for finding an adaptable counterplan to the actual regeneration project. The analysis results of these five factors revealed it was necessary to find alternatives for securing stable employment to increase the efficiency and the quality of this project. Therefore, a potential alternative was proposed for a new form of an intermediary organization that comprehensively looks at urban problems in various dimensions. For a smooth urban regeneration project operation, it was suggested to ensure a certain legal status for domestic urban regeneration intermediary organizations. Efforts for securing autonomy from the administration should be prepared with complementary attempts and efforts by both the administration and these organizations. Lastly, a clear division of roles between city-local-community level intermediary organizations should be supplemented in the guidelines for urban regeneration New Deal projects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022년도 국토교통부 '도시재생 전문인력 양성사업'의 지원으로 수행되었음. 과제번호: R2018042

References

  1. An, S.W. (2017). Consolidating the role of intermediary organization for local-driven urban regeneration, Planning And Policy, 433, 36-45.
  2. Choe, J.K., Jo, K.H., & Yoon, S.E. (2018). A study on the current status and revitalization of social economy support organization in local government, Gyeonggi Research Institute, 13-34.
  3. Choi, I.S., & Jeon, D.W. (2020). A research on possibility of improvement for sustainability of local governments' intermediary organizations, Korea Research Institute For Local Administration, 13-239.
  4. Han, Y.O., & Jeong, E.J. (2021). Improvement plan for the role of urban regeneration center using in-depth interview: Focusing on urban regeneration center in metropolitan government, The Korean Association of Urban Policies, 12(1), 155-178.
  5. In, S.M. (2018, June 19). Suwon City Sustainable City Foundation and Suwon Urban Development Corporation signed the "Business Agreement for sustainable development". Goodtimes. retrieved from http://www.goodtimes.or.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=54212
  6. Jeoun, B.S., & Hwang, W.S. (2018). A development strategy of intermediary organizations leading governance in seoul, The Seoul Institute, 3-190.
  7. Jo, S.J. (2022). Role Reestablishment of The Urban Regeneration Support Center : Focused on Three Case Study in Ansan, Thesis, Hanyang University.
  8. Juen, S.B., Lee, J.H., & Kim, J.B. (2019), Contracting out system for the urban regeneration core facility management, Journal of Urban Policies, 10(2), 5-23.
  9. Kang, H.N. (2021). Analysing capacity factors for urban sustainability transformations - The 'eco-capital Suwon' in South Korea-, KIEAE Journal, 21(2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2021.21.2.005
  10. Kim, H.J., Jo, S.Y., Kim, Y.E., & Sim, J.H. (2016), A study on growth plan of urban regeneration intermediary organization, LHI Land & Housing Institute, 13-170.
  11. Kim, K., Kriznik, B., & Kamvasnou, K. (2021). Between the state and citizens: Changing governance of intermediary organisations for inclusive and sustainable urban regeneration in Seoul, Land Use Policy, 105, 105433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105433
  12. Kim, Y.H. (2020). A study on the roles and efficient operations of urban regeneration support center as intermediary organization, Korea Academy Industrial Cooperation Society, 21(2), 448-459.
  13. Lee, K.T., & Ha H.S. (2016). The role of intermediary organizations for village community activation: in the perspective of transaction costs, The Korean Association For Policy Studies, 25(1), 455-490.
  14. Lee, Y.C. (2021, December 23). Seoul Metropolitan Government's budget cut and residents' projects are likely to drift. TBS News. Retrived from http://tbs.seoul.kr/news/newsView.do?idx_800=3458167&seq_800=20450755&typ_800=7
  15. Lim, S.Y., & Jeong, E.J. (2018). Implications of intermediary organization for urban regeneration new deal's successful driving, KRIHS Policy Brief, 1-8.
  16. Park S.N., Seo, S.J., & Lim, K.R. (2015). The roles and supporting strategies of national urban regeneration assistance agency: A comparative study on four specialists groups recognition, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 16(4), 29-46.
  17. Park, J.D. (2019, October 18). Suwon City wins best local government award for 'Urban Regeneration New Deal' achievement. Gihoilbo. retrieved from http://www.kihoilbo.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=832892
  18. Park, S.H., & Lim, S.Y. (2014). Rebuilding intermediary organizations for urban regeneration in Korea: A government-civil society relation perspective, KRIHS, 17-103.
  19. Ryoo, S.L., Park, J.H., Oh, M.J., Park, H.R., & Yoon, S.H. (2021). A study on the introduction of "Package Lab" to revitalize urban regeneration projects in Seoul, Seoul Metropolitan Council, 61-85.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan City Framework Ordinance On Social Economy, (2016). https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/ordinInfoP.do?viewCls=ordinInfoP&gubun=KLAW&ordinSeq=1213033&chrClsCd=010202&urlMode=ordinScJoRltInfoR
  21. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2021a, January). Current Status of 'Seoul-style Urban Regeneration'. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Retrieved from https://uri.seoul.go.kr/surc/seoulInfo/businessTypeAndStatus.do
  22. Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2021b, June 18). Inducement of private development in Seoul and link to redevelopment: Great transformation to Urban Regeneration 2.0. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Retrieved from https://news.seoul.go.kr/citybuild/archives/513169
  23. Special Act on Promotion of And Support for Urban Regeneration, (2014). https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=149567#0000
  24. Suwon City Framework Ordinance on Promotion of And Support for Urban Regeneration, (2017). https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/ordinInfoP.do?ordinSeq=1303426