Imaging Science in Dentistry

  • 제52권3호
  • /
  • Pages.245-258
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2233-7822(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7830(eISSN)
대한영상치의학회 (Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CBCT-based assessment of root canal treatment using micro-CT reference images

  • Lamira, Alessando (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Mazzi-Chaves, Jardel Francisco (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Nicolielo, Laura Ferreira Pinheiro (OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven) ;
  • Leoni, Graziela Bianchi (Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ribeirao Preto) ;
  • Silva-Sousa, Alice Correa (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Silva-Sousa, Yara Terezinha Correa (Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ribeirao Preto) ;
  • Pauwels, Ruben (OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven) ;
  • Buls, Nico (Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel) ;
  • Jacobs, Reinhilde (OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven) ;
  • Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.25
  • 심사 : 2022.04.08
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study compared the root canal anatomy between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images before and after biomechanical preparation and root canal filling. Materials and Methods: Isthmus-containing mesial roots of mandibular molars(n=14) were scanned by micro-CT and 3 CBCT devices: 3D Accuitomo 170 (ACC), NewTom 5G (N5G) and NewTom VGi evo (NEVO). Two calibrated observers evaluated the images for 2-dimensional quantitative parameters, the presence of debris or root perforation, and filling quality in the root canal and isthmus. The kappa coefficient, analysis of variance, and the Tukey test were used for statistical analyses(α=5%). Results: Substantial intra-observer agreement (κ=0.63) was found between micro-CT and ACC, N5G, and NEVO. Debris detection was difficult using ACC (42.9%), N5G (40.0%), and NEVO (40%), with no agreement between micro-CT and ACC, N5G, and NEVO (0.05<κ<0.12). After biomechanical preparation, 2.4%-4.8% of CBCT images showed root perforation that was absent on micro-CT. The 2D parameters showed satisfactory reproducibility between micro-CT and ACC, N5G, and NEVO (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.60-0.73). Partially filled isthmuses were observed in 2.9% of the ACC images, 8.8% of the N5G and NEVO images, and 26.5% of the micro-CT images, with no agreement between micro-CT and ACC, and poor agreement between micro-CT and N5G and NEVO. Excellent agreement was found for area, perimeter, and the major and minor diameters, while the roundness measures were satisfactory. Conclusion: CBCT images aided in isthmus detection and classification, but did not allow their classification after biomechanical preparation and root canal filling.

키워드

과제정보

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel(CAPES-Brazil process no. 33002029032P4) and the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (process no. 2018/14450-1). Ruben Pauwels is supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 754513 and by Aarhus University Research Foundation (AIAS-COFUND).

참고문헌

  1. Estrela C, Rabelo LE, de Souza JB, Alencar AH, Estrela CR, Sousa Neto MD, et al. Frequency of root canal isthmi in human permanent teeth determined by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2015; 41: 1535-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.016
  2. Patel K, Mannocci F, Patel S. The assessment and management of external cervical resorption with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical study. J Endod 2016; 42: 1435-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.014
  3. Beacham JT, Geist JR, Yu Q, Himel VT, Sabey KA. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomographic image interpretation by endodontists and endodontic residents. J Endod 2018; 44: 571-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.012
  4. Martins JN, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marques D, Francisco H, Carames J. Differences in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 931-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12896
  5. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 1138-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13115
  6. Mazzi-Chaves JF, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Sousa-Neto MD. Cone-beam computed tomographic-based assessment of filled c-shaped canals: artifact expression of cone-beam computed tomography as opposed to micro-computed tomography and nano-computed tomography. J Endod 2020; 46: 1702-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.010
  7. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Carvalho KK, Barbosa AF, Versiani MA, et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32 (suppl 1): e66.
  8. Camargo RV, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Leoni GB, Vasconcelos KF, Lamira A, Jacobs R, et al. Quantitative assessment of 2-dimensional parameters in tomographic images by using different segmentation methods. J Endod 2020; 46: 694-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.012
  9. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 1675-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187
  10. Bechara B, Alex Mcmahan C, Moore WS, Noujeim M, Teixeira FB, Geha H. Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120245. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120245
  11. Keles A, Keskin C. A micro-computed tomographic study of band-shaped root canal isthmuses, having their floor in the apical third of mesial roots of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 240-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12842
  12. Malentacca A, Lajolo C. A new technique to make transparent teeth without decalcifying: description of the methodology and micro-hardness assessment. Ann Anat 2015; 197: 11-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.10.011
  13. Maret D, Peters OA, Galibourg A, Dumoncel J, Esclassan R, Kahn JL, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes. J Endod 2014; 40: 1321-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.014
  14. Shaheen E, Khalil W, Ezeldeen M, Van de Casteele E, Sun Y, Politis C, et al. Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123: 123-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.09.005
  15. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Versiani MA, Moldauer BI, Topham G, Gutmann JL, et al. Comparative accuracy of the clearing technique, CBCT and micro-CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 90-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12593
  16. Oenning AC, Salmon B, Vasconcelos KF, Pinheiro Nicolielo LF, Lambrichts I, Sanderink G, et al. DIMITRA paediatric skull phantoms: development of age-specific paediatric models for dentomaxillofacial radiology research. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018; 47: 20170285.
  17. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 589-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9
  18. Hsu YY, Kim S. The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmuses. Dent Clin North Am 1997; 41: 529-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00066-0
  19. Jacobs R. Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. JBR-BTR 2011; 94: 254-65.
  20. Rodrigues CT, Jacobs R, Vasconcelos KF, Lambrechts P, RubiraBullen IR, Gaeta-Araujo H, et al. Influence of CBCT-based volumetric distortion and beam hardening artefacts on the assessment of root canal filling quality in isthmus-containing molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021; 50: 20200503. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200503
  21. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028
  22. Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120443. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120443
  23. Decurcio DA, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Porto OC, Azevedo BC, Estrela C. Effect of root canal filling materials on dimensions of cone-beam computed tomography images. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20: 260-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200023
  24. Mazzi-Chaves JF, Camargo RV, Borges AF, Silva RG, Pauwels R, Silva-Sousa YT, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics - state of the art. Curr Oral Health Rep 2021; 8: 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-021-00292-8
  25. Bechara B, McMahan CA, Nasseh I, Geha H, Hayek E, Khawam G, et al. Number of basis images effect on detection of root fractures in endodontically treated teeth using a cone beam computed tomography machine: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115: 676-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.01.026
  26. Vasconcelos KF, Nicolielo LF, Nascimento MC, Haiter-Neto F, Boscolo FN, Van Dessel J, et al. Artefact expression associated with several cone-beam computed tomographic machines when imaging root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 994-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12395
  27. Brito-Junior M, Santos LA, Faria-e-Silva AL, Pereira RD, Sousa-Neto MD. Ex vivo evaluation of artifacts mimicking fracture lines on cone-beam computed tomography produced by different root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12121
  28. Celikten B, Jacobs R, deFaria Vasconcelos K, Huang Y, Nicolielo LF, Orhan K. Assessment of volumetric distortion artifact in filled root canals using different cone-beam computed tomographic devices. J Endod 2017; 43: 1517-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.035
  29. Codari M, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L, Haiter Neto F, Jacobs R. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1509-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13019