Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국수산과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of nanobubbles (oxygen, ozone) on the Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei), Vibrio parahaemolyticus and water quality under lab conditions

  • Received : 2021.11.16
  • Accepted : 2022.07.25
  • Published : 2022.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study assessed the effects of oxygen and ozone nanobubbles on gill morphology, weight gain, and mortality of Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei), as well as the level of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and water quality of shrimp culture tanks under lab conditions. Two experiments were carried out with oxygen macrobubble, ozone macrobubble, oxygen nanobubble, ozone nanobubble, and control treatments (air-stone macrobubble). Experiments were done in triplicate in 100 L tanks with 15‰ saline water, and 20 shrimp per tank. Tanks in Experiment 1 were not inoculated with bacteria; tanks in Experiment 2 were inoculated with V. parahaemolyticus at a concentration of 106 CFU/mL. The results revealed that short treatments with ozone nanobubbles had minimal impact on shrimp gills, mortality, and growth rates, reduced V. parahaemolyticus concentration in water compared to the other groups, and improve water quality. These laboratory results indicate that ozone nanobubble treatment may be useful for controlling V. parahaemolyticus. More work is needed to find the best protocol to apply the technology on a commercial scale.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was carried out with financial support (Grant No. 109050-002) from UK Government-Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), Global AMR Innovation Fund (GAMRIF) and the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y. Principle and applications of micro-bubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere. 2011;84:1175-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054
  2. AquaPro Solutions. aQua+0.75M technical specification. Singapore: AquaPro Solutions; 2019.
  3. Atkinson AJ, Apul OG, Schneider O, Garcia-Segura S, Westerhoff P. Nanobubble technologies offer opportunities to improve water treatment. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:1196-205. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00606
  4. Azevedo A, Etchepare R, Calgaroto S, Rubio J. Aqueous dispersions of nanobubbles: generation, properties and features. Miner Eng. 2016;94:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.05.001
  5. Baird R, Bridgewater L. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2017.
  6. Boyd CE, Fast AW. Pond monitoring and management. In: Fast AW, Lester LJ, editors. Marine shrimp culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 497-513.
  7. Buller NB. Bacteria from fish and other aquatic animals: a practical identification manual. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2004.
  8. Cefas. Ozone-potential application in depuration systems in the UK: cefas discussion document. Weymouth: Cefas Weymouth Laboratory; 2010.
  9. Chaplin M. Nanobubbles (ultrafine bubbles) [Internet]. Water Structure and Science. 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 19]. https://water.lsbu.ac.uk/water/nanobubble.html
  10. Ebina K, Shi K, Hirao M, Hashimoto J, Kawato Y, Kaneshiro S, et al. Oxygen and air nanobubble water solution promote the growth of plants, fishes, and mice. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e65339.
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018-meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome: FAO; 2018.
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO; 2020.
  13. Fregoso-Lopez MG, Morales-Covarrubias MS, Franco-Nava MA, Ramirez-Rochin J, Fierro-Sanudo JF, Ponce-Palafox JT, et al. Histological alterations in gills of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in low-salinity waters under different stocking densities: potential relationship with nitrogen compounds. Aquac Res. 2017;48:5854-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13408
  14. Galang DP, Ashari AK, Sulmatiwi L, Mahasri G, Prayogo, Sari LA. The oxygen content and dissolved oxygen consumption level of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in the nanobubble cultivation system. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;236:012014.
  15. Goncalves AA, Gagnon GA. Ozone application in recirculating aquaculture system: an overview. Ozone Sci Eng. 2011;33:345-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2011.604595
  16. Gurung A, Dahl O, Jansson K. The fundamental phenomena of nanobubbles and their behavior in wastewater treatment technologies. Geosyst Eng. 2016;19:133-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2016.1153987
  17. Higgins P. ORP management in wastewater as an indicator of process efficiency [Internet]. YSI. 2013 [cited 2020 May 5]. https://www.ysi.com/ysi-blog/water-blogged-blog/2013/08/orp-management-in-wastewater-as-an-indicator-of-process-efficiency
  18. Ikehata K, Li Y. Ozone-based processes. In: Ameta SC, Ameta R, editors. Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment. London: Academic Press; 2018. p. 115-34.
  19. Imaizumi K, Tinwongger S, Kondo H, Hirono I. Disinfection of an EMS/AHPND strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus using ozone nanobubbles. J Fish Dis. 2018;41:725-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12783
  20. Jhunkeaw C, Khongcharoen N, Rungrueng N, Sangpo P, Panphut W, Thapinta A, et al. Ozone nanobubble treatment in freshwater effectively reduced pathogenic fish bacteria and is safe for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture. 2021;534:736286.
  21. Kirby BJ. Micro- and nanoscale fluid mechanics: transport in microfluidic devices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  22. Lightner DV. A handbook of shrimp pathology and diagnostic procedures for diseases of cultured penaeid shrimp. Baton Rouge: World Aquaculture Society; 1996.
  23. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOSTE]. National Standard TCVN 8710-19: 2019 on aquatic diseases - diagnostic procedure - part 19: acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in shrimp [Internet]. MARD. 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 22]. http://tieuchuan.mard.gov.vn/ViewDetails.aspx-?id=9263&lv=11&cap=1
  24. Nano Bubble Technologies. Aquaculture [Internet]. Nano bubble technologies. 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 22]. https://www.nanobubble.com.au/applications/aquaculture/
  25. Nghi NH, Cuong LC, Dieu TV, Ngu T, Oanh DTY. Ozonation process and water disinfection. Vietnam J Chem. 2018;56:717-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/vjch.201800076
  26. Nghia NH, Van PT, Giang PT, Hanh NT, St-Hilaire S, Domingos JA. Control of Vibrio parahaemolyticus (AHPND strain) and improvement of water quality using nanobubble technology. Aquac Res. 2021;52:2727-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15124
  27. Parmar R, Majumder SK. Microbubble generation and micro-bubble-aided transport process intensification-a state-ofthe-art report. Chem Eng Process. 2013;64:79-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.12.002
  28. Schroeder JP, Klatt SF, Schlachter M, Zablotski Y, Keuter S, Spieck E, et al. Impact of ozonation and residual ozone-produced oxidants on the nitrification performance of moving-bed biofilters from marine recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Eng. 2015;65:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2014.10.008
  29. Seki M, Ishikawa T, Terada H, Nashimoto M. Microbicidal effects of stored aqueous ozone solution generated by nano-bubble technology. In Vivo. 2017;31:579-83. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11097
  30. Sjogreen CA, Tellez DAL, Perez JER, Hurtado PCP, Roa-Rojas J. Experimental study of nanobubbles in salt solutions. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Exact Fis Nat. 2018;42:41-8. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.543
  31. Suslow TV. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) for water disinfection monitoring, control, and documentation. Oakland, CA: University of California; 2004.
  32. TCTS. Ket qua thuc hien nam 2021 va trien khai nhiem vu trong tam nam 2022 linh vuc thuy san [Fisheries annual report-2021, Hanoi]. Hochiminh: TCTS; 2021.
  33. Temesgen T, Bui TT, Han M, Kim TI, Park H. Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water-treatment techniques: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;246:40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.011
  34. Tzaneva V, Bailey S, Perry SF. The interactive effects of hypoxemia, hyperoxia, and temperature on the gill morphology of goldfish (Carassius auratus). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300:R1344-51. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00530.2010
  35. Wang L, Miao X, Ali J, Lyu T, Pan G. Quantification of oxygen nanobubbles in particulate matters and potential applications in remediation of anaerobic environment. ACS Omega. 2018;3:10624-30. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00784
  36. Weijs JH, Lohse D. Why surface nanobubbles live for hours. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:054501.
  37. Weitkamp DE, Katz M. A review of dissolved gas supersaturation literature. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1980;109:659-702. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1980)109<659:ARODGS>2.0.CO;2
  38. World Health Organization [WHO], Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: interpretative summary and technical report. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  39. XLSTAT. The leading data analysis and statistical solution for Microsoft EXCEL® [Internet]. Addinsoft [cited 2020 Feb 22]. https://www.xlstat.com/en/