Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

  • Volume 34
  • /
  • Pages.39.1-39.11
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-3618(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2052-4374(eISSN)
The Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (대한직업환경의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association between presenteeism and mental health among logistic center workers

  • Hyoungseob Yoo (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Ji-hun Song (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Hyoung-Ryoul Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2022.08.10
  • Accepted : 2022.10.16
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Workers in logistics centers are always pressed for time to collect and pack products. They also participate in high-intensity manual labor in which various musculoskeletal hazards exist. In the case of logistic center labor, it is estimated that there is a high risk of presenteeism due to the above characteristics which can cause deterioration of workers' mental health. However, there is insufficient research on this topic. Methods: Workers in a logistic center were surveyed using an Internet questionnaire. The survey items included demographic characteristics, labor intensity and work-related factors, and mental health aspects such as depression and anxiety. The survey was conducted for about a month from July 26, 2021 and a total of 353 people were analyzed. Through the χ2 test and t-test, the characteristics of workers who experienced presenteeism were examined and the prevalence ratios (PRs) of depression and anxiety experiences were calculated by multivariable Poisson regression. Afterwards, stratification analysis considering gender, the type of contract, and labor intensity was implemented. Results: In the group that experienced presenteeism, the number of working days per week was higher and fixed-term workers, high labor intensity, and sleep deprivation were more common. In the multi-Poisson regression analysis conducted by adjusting the demographic characteristics, working hours, and work-related factors, the PRs of depression and anxiety were 1.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.18) and 1.81 (1.22-2.68), respectively. In particular, the p-value for interactions was significant when stratified with the type of contract. Conclusions: As a result of the study, presenteeism and mental health were associated in logistic center workers. To prevent mental health issues of logistic center workers, management of presenteeism is necessary and a prospective study is needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the labor union of the logistic center.

References

  1. Park H, Kim SH, Jeong SJ, Seo S. The Changes in the parcel delivery service according to the spread of COVID-19 in Korea. J Transport Res 2021;28(8):51-66.
  2. Lovas S, Nagy K, Sandor J, Adam B. Presumed exposure to chemical pollutants and experienced health impacts among warehouse workers at logistics companies: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(13):7052.
  3. Lee JH, Jung HS, Lee HJ. The Impact on the musculoskeletal symptoms of the warehouse employees' work-related characteristics and job stress. Korean J Occup Health Nurs 2017;26(3):133-41. https://doi.org/10.5807/KJOHN.2017.26.3.133
  4. Orris P, Hartman DE, Strauss P, Anderson RJ, Collins J, Knopp C, et al. Stress among package truck drivers. Am J Ind Med 1997;31(2):202-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199702)31:2<202::AID-AJIM10>3.0.CO;2-5
  5. Shen S, Li Y, Zhou M, Zhang C, Jiang Y, Kang Y. Depression status and associated factors in Chinese occupational truck drivers. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;67(3):1497-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9651-3
  6. Tucker MK, Jimmieson NL, Jamieson JE. Role stressors in Australian transport and logistics workers: psychosocial implications. Saf Sci 2018;109:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.007
  7. Ishimaru T, Mine Y, Fujino Y. Two definitions of presenteeism: sickness presenteeism and impaired work function. Occup Med (Lond) 2020;70(2):95-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa009
  8. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54(7):502-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.502
  9. Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Hemingway H, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, et al. Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: the Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 2005;95(1):98-102. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2003.035873
  10. Dew K, Keefe V, Small K. 'Choosing' to work when sick: workplace presenteeism. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(10):2273-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.022
  11. Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW. The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. J Occup Environ Med 1999;41(10):863-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199910000-00007
  12. Turpin RS, Ozminkowski RJ, Sharda CE, Collins JJ, Berger ML, Billotti GM, et al. Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(11):1123-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000144999.35675.a0
  13. Skagen K, Collins AM. The consequences of sickness presenteeism on health and wellbeing over time: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2016;161:169-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.005
  14. Johnston DA, Harvey SB, Glozier N, Calvo RA, Christensen H, Deady M. The relationship between depression symptoms, absenteeism and presenteeism. J Affect Disord 2019;256:536-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.041
  15. Beck A, Crain AL, Solberg LI, Unutzer J, Glasgow RE, Maciosek MV, et al. Severity of depression and magnitude of productivity loss. Ann Fam Med 2011;9(4):305-11. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1260
  16. Esposito E, Wang JL, Williams JV, Patten SB. Mood and anxiety disorders, the association with presenteeism in employed members of a general population sample. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2007;16(3):231-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00002335
  17. Laing SS, Jones SM. Anxiety and depression mediate the relationship between perceived workplace health support and presenteeism: a cross-sectional analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2016;58(11):1144-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000880
  18. Demerouti E, Blanc PM, Schaufeli W, Hox J. Present but sick: a three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Dev Int 2009;14(1):50-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910933574
  19. Gustafsson K, Marklund S. Consequences of sickness presence and sickness absence on health and work ability: a Swedish prospective cohort study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2011;24(2):153-65. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-011-0013-3
  20. Taloyan M, Aronsson G, Leineweber C, Magnusson Hanson L, Alexanderson K, Westerlund H. Sickness presenteeism predicts suboptimal self-rated health and sickness absence: a nationally representative study of the Swedish working population. PLoS One 2012;7(9):e44721.
  21. Conway PM, Hogh A, Rugulies R, Hansen AM. Is sickness presenteeism a risk factor for depression? A Danish 2-year follow-up study. J Occup Environ Med 2014;56(6):595-603. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000177
  22. Gutelius B, Theodore N. The Future of Warehouse Work: Technological Change in the U.S. Logistics Industry. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Labor Center; 2019.
  23. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K. Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47(9):958-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17
  24. Hansen CD, Andersen JH. Going ill to work--what personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Soc Sci Med 2008;67(6):956-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.022
  25. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA 1999;282(18):1737-44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
  26. Shin JH, Kim HC, Jung CH, Kim JB, Jung SW, Cho HJ, et al. The standardization of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2013;52(3):115-21. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2013.52.3.115
  27. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14(5):377-81. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
  28. Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: a joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. Sleep (Basel) 2015;38(6):843-4. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4716
  29. Behrens T, Taeger D, Wellmann J, Keil U. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in crosssectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio. Methods Inf Med 2004;43(5):505-9.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1633907
  30. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157(10):940-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg074
  31. Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med 1998;55(4):272-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.55.4.272
  32. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3(1):21.
  33. Petersen MR, Deddens JA. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8(1):9.
  34. Reuter M, Wahrendorf M, Di Tecco C, Probst TM, Ruhle S, Ghezzi V, et al. Do temporary workers more often decide to work while sick? Evidence for the link between employment contract and presenteeism in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(10):1868.
  35. Kim M, Choi H, Ryu E. Predictors of clinical nurses' presenteeism. Korean J Occup Health Nurs 2014;23(3):134-45. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2014.23.3.134
  36. Kim GE, Jo MW, Shin YW. Increased prevalence of depression in South Korea from 2002 to 2013. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):16979.
  37. Cho YS, Park JB, Lee KJ, Min KB, Baek CI. The association between Korean workers' presenteeism and psychosocial factors within workplaces. Ann Occup Environ Med 2016;28(1):41.
  38. Vives A, Amable M, Ferrer M, Moncada S, Llorens C, Muntaner C, et al. Employment precariousness and poor mental health: evidence from Spain on a new social determinant of health. J Environ Public Health 2013;2013:978656.
  39. Sanne B, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Moen BE, Tell GS. Testing the Job Demand-Control-Support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: the Hordaland Health Study. Occup Med (Lond) 2005;55(6):463-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi071
  40. Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav 2010;31(4):519-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630
  41. Geurts SA, Sonnentag S. Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32(6):482-92. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1053
  42. McEwen BS. Protection and damage from acute and chronic stress: allostasis and allostatic overload and relevance to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1032(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.001
  43. Godin I, Kittel F, Coppieters Y, Siegrist J. A prospective study of cumulative job stress in relation to mental health. BMC Public Health 2005;5(1):67.
  44. Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 1979;24(2):285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
  45. Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG. Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med 1999;56(5):302-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.5.302
  46. Paterniti S, Niedhammer I, Lang T, Consoli SM. Psychosocial factors at work, personality traits and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal results from the GAZEL Study. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:111-7.
  47. Dormann C, Zapf D. Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi-wave study. J Occup Organ Psychol 2002;75(1):33-58.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902167630