Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Energy and nutrition evaluation per single serving package for each type of home meal replacement rice

가정간편식 밥류의 유형별 1회 제공 포장량 당 에너지 및 영양성분 함량 평가

  • Choi, In-Young (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University) ;
  • Yeon, Jee-Young (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seowon University) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Hyun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2022.05.06
  • Accepted : 2022.06.29
  • Published : 2022.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the energy and nutrient contents of home meal replacement (HMR) rice products per single serving package based on nutrition labels. Methods: The market research was conducted from February to July 2021 on products sold on the internet, at convenience stores, etc. A total of 406 products were investigated. The products were divided into the following 6 classifications: instant rice (n = 45), cup rice (n = 64), frozen rice (n = 188), rice bowls with toppings (n = 32), gimbap (n = 38), and triangular gimbap (n = 39). Results: The mean packaging weight per serving was the highest in the rice bowl with toppings at 297.1 g, followed by cup rice (264.0 g), frozen rice (239.5 g), gimbap (230.2 g), instant rice (193.4 g), and triangular gimbap (121.6 g) (p < 0.001). The energy per serving package for the rice bowl with toppings was significantly the highest at 496.0 kcal (p < 0.001). The sodium content per serving package of gimbap was the highest at 1,021.8 mg and that of the instant rice was lowest at 37.4 mg (p < 0.001). The price per serving package of the rice bowl with toppings at 4,333.8 won was the highest. The contribution to the daily nutritional value per serving package of all types of HMR rice products surveyed showed an average range of 10-25% for energy, 11-22% for carbohydrates, and 2-51% for sodium. Conclusion: These results indicate the energy and nutrient contents of HMR rice products, vary by type. Therefore, consumers should review the nutrition labeling to select an appropriate HMR rice product based on their intended consumption.

본 연구에서는 가정간편식 (HMR)으로 시판되는 밥류의 1회 제공 포장량 실태를 파악하고, 1회 제공 포장량 당 영양표시에 기반으로 한 에너지 및 영양성분 함량 등에 대한 영양평가를 실시하여, 시판 HMR 밥류의 영양표시 정보 활용의 중요성과 가공식품 밥류의 1회 제공 포장량 설정의 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 시장조사는 식품산업통계에서 HMR 밥류의 매출액이 많은 상위브랜드를 포함하여, 인터넷, 편의점, 슈퍼, 대형마트에서 판매되는 제품을 대상으로 2021년 2월부터 7월까지 실시하였다. 총 406개의 제품을 조사하였으며, 유형별로 즉석밥류 (45개), 컵밥류 (64개), 냉동밥류 (188개), 덮밥류 (32개), 김밥류 (38개), 삼각김밥류(39개)의 총 6개 유형으로 분류하였다. 본 연구에서 조사한 총 406개의 HMR 밥류 중 26.1%인 106개 제품에 인분 표시가 있었다. 1회 제공 포장중량은 덮밥류가 297.1 g으로, 컵밥류 (264.0 g), 냉동밥류 (239.5 g), 김밥류 (230.2 g), 즉석밥류 (193.4 g), 삼각김밥류 (121.6 g)에 비하여 유의적으로 높았다 (p < 0.001). 1회 제공 포장중량 당 에너지 또한 덮밥류가 496.0 kcal로, 냉동밥류 (407.1 kcal), 김밥류 (384.2 kcal), 컵밥류 (370.2 kcal), 즉석밥류 (285.7 kcal), 삼각김밥류(218.1 kcal)에 비하여 유의적으로 높았다 (p < 0.001). 1회 제공 포장중량 당 나트륨 함량은 김밥류가 1,021.8 mg으로 가장 높았으며, 덮밥류 (968.2 mg), 컵밥류 (910.2 mg), 냉동밥류 (884.7 mg), 삼각김밥류 (529.9 mg), 즉석밥류 (37.4 mg)의 순으로 나타났다 (p < 0.001). 1회 제공 포장중량 당 가격은 덮밥류가 4,333.8원으로 가장 비쌌으며, 컵밥류 (3,007.8원), 냉동밥류 (2,728.6원), 김밥류 (2,500.0원), 즉석밥류 (2,066.6원), 삼각김밥류 (1,212.8원)의 순으로 나타났다 (p < 0.001). 1회 제공 포장중량 당 1일 영양성분 기준치에 대한 기여율은 모든 유형에서 에너지의 경우 평균 10-25%, 단백질의 경우 10-30%, 나트륨의 경우 2-51%의 범위로 나타났으며, 탄수화물의 경우 평균 15% 내외 (11-22%)의 기여율을 보였다. 밥의 1인 1회 분량인 210 g을 기준으로 HMR 밥류 210 g당 영양소 함량을 평가한 결과, 1일 영양성분 기준치에 대한 비율은 에너지의 경우 삼각김밥류가 18.8%로 가장 높았으며, 냉동밥류 17.9%, 김밥류 17.5%, 덮밥류 17.4%, 즉석밥류 15.3%, 컵밥류 14.9%의 순으로 나타났다 (p < 0.001). 나트륨의 경우 김밥류(46.5%)와 삼각김밥류 (46.1%)가 유의적으로 높았다 (p < 0.001). 당류의 경우 평균 0.6-5.3%, 지방의 경우 3.1-19.4%, 단백질의 경우 11.3-21.4%의 범위로 나타났다. 본 연구는 편의 표집 방법을 이용하였기 때문에 현재 시장에 유통되고 있는 모든 제품을 포함하지 못한 제한점을 가지고 있으나, 매출액에 기반한 대표 제품과 지역적 제한이 없는 온라인 시장을 포함한 조사로 최대한 조사 시점의 시장 제품을 포함하고자 하였다. 이를 통해 HMR 밥류의 에너지와 영양소 함량 및 가격이 유형별 차이를 보이고, 동일 유형내에서도 변동 범위가 넓어 소비자들이 섭취를 위한 선택 시 섭취 목적과 조합하는 식품의 유무와 종류에 따라 영양표시 정보를 확인하고, 정보에 기반한 바람직한 선택이 이루어질 수 있도록 해야 할 것이다. 또한 HMR 밥류의 1 포장량 당 제공량을 동일하게 적용한 평가에서도 HMR 밥류의 유형에 따라 에너지 및 에너지 영양소의 구성에 차이가 있고 나트륨의 함량에 있어서도 큰 차이를 보여, 유형별 밥류의 주된 섭취 용도 (식사/간식)와 형태 (단독/조합) 등에 따른 최종 영양 제공량을 고려한 1인 1회 제공 포장량의 다양성이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee GL, Hwang YJ, Ban HJ, Lim SJ, Jin HJ, Lee HS. Impact of the growth of single-person households on the food market and policy tasks [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2015 Oct 10 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/krei/researchReportView.do?key=67&biblioId=395430&pageType=010101.
  2. Food Information Statistics System (KR). 2020 Processed food segmentation market report-rice processed food [Internet]. Naju: Food Information Statistics System; 2021 Jan 21 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/home/board/FB0027.do?act=read&bpoId=3659.
  3. Yun SJ, Oh IS. Usage status of traditional rice cake as a meal substitute and analysis on the selection attributes affecting purchase. Korean J Culinary Res 2014; 20(2): 38-53.
  4. Park JD. Study on processing properties of convenience rice product with different rice. Food Sci Ind 2016; 49(2): 71-77. https://doi.org/10.23093/FSI.2016.49.2.71
  5. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KR). 2019 Food balance sheet [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2020 Dec [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/krei/researchReportView.do?key=67&pageType=010101&biblioId=528309.
  6. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KR). Food grain consumption survey in 2021 [Internet]. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2022 Jan 27 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1ED0006&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=F14_20&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE.
  7. Yun JG, Kim JS. A study on commercialization strategy based on SWOT analysis: commercialization strategy consulting practice of aseptic packaged cooked rice production technology. Korean Manag Consult Rev 2014; 14(3): 127-139.
  8. Food Information Statistics System (KR). POS sales report by items [Internet]. Naju: Food Information Statistics System; 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/home/oldsales.do.
  9. Kim SH, Baek SW. A study on the consumer preferences and choice attributes of purchasing organic instant rice. Korean J Org Agric 2020; 28(2): 189-208. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2020.28.2.189
  10. Oh MC, Yang TS, Oh CK, editors. Antioxidative activity of HMR instant rice added ecofriendly dried vegetables. In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition Conference; 2021 Oct 27-29; Bexco, Busan. Busan: Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition; 2021.
  11. Choi YJ, Yang TS, Lim SB, Oh MC. HMR consumption status and product improvement requirement for the development of new instant rice product added with seaweeds: focused on Jeju province consumers. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2019; 25(11): 173-189. https://doi.org/10.20878/CSHR.2019.25.11.018
  12. Choi JY, Kim KS, Oh ST. Consumer perception and purchase pattern of HMR type flavored cooked rice. Korean J Food Nutr 2019; 32(4): 385-394.
  13. Park SB, Lee HJ, Kim HY, Hwang HS, Park DS, Hong WS. A study on domestic consumers' needs and importance-performance analysis of selective attributes for developing home meal replacement (HMR) products. Korean J Food Cook Sci 2016; 32(3): 342-352. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.342
  14. Food Information Statistics System (KR). Research reports. 2021 Market segmentation of food processing: home meal replacement market [Internet]. Naju: Food Information Statistics System; 2022 Jan 18 [cited 2022 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/home/board/FB0027.do?act=read&bpoId=4136&bcaId=0&pageIndex=1.
  15. Korean Statistical Information Service (KR). Mainly purchased home meal replacement (HMR) items [Internet]. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2022 Apr 4 [cited 2022 Apr 15]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=114&tblId=DT_114053_063&conn_path=I2.
  16. Park MS, Heo SY. Characteristics of consumer perception and consumption behavior according to COVID-19 [Internet]. Food Information Statistics System; 2022 Feb 23 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/home/board/FB0003.do?act=read&bpoId=4160&bcaId=0&pageIndex=1.
  17. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Food Labeling Standard [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2021 Feb 5 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%8B%9D%ED%92%88%EB%93%B1%EC%9D%98%ED%91%9C%EC%8B%9C%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80.
  18. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR); The Korean Nutrition Society. 2020 Dietary reference intakes for Koreans: application. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2022.
  19. Steenhuis IH, Vermeer WM. Portion size: review and framework for interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009; 6: 58.
  20. Kral TV, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79(6): 962-968. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/79.6.962
  21. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). The act on labeling and advertising of foods [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2021 Feb 5 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%8B%9D%ED%92%88%EB%93%B1%EC%9D%98%ED%91%9C%EC%8B%9C%C2%B7%EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%EC%97%90%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99.
  22. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR); The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2020. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  23. Kim MH, Choi IY, Yeon JY. Status of serving labeling of home meal replacement-soups and stews, and evaluation of their energy and nutrient content per serving. J Nutr Health 2021; 54(5): 560-572. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.5.560
  24. Kim TK, Choi HD, Kim YB, Jeon KH, Choi YS. Home meal replacement status and technology trends. Food Ind Nutr 2017; 22(1): 1-7.
  25. Shin GN, Kim YR, Kim MH. Nutritional evaluation of convenience meals in convenience stores near the universities. Korean J Community Nutr 2017; 22(5): 375-386. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2017.22.5.375
  26. Park ES, Kim MH, Choi MK. Nutritional assessment focusing on minerals of ready-to-cook foods sold in Korea. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2019; 29(6): 501-510. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.12.29.6.501
  27. Rural Development Administration (KR). Food composition table for convenient use by general consumers. 2nd ed. Suwon: Rural Development Administration; 2012.
  28. Korea Consumer Agency (KR). Press release: quality comparison of cup rice [Internet]. Eumseong: Korea Consumer Agency; 2020 Sep 2 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.kca.go.kr/home/sub.do?menukey=4002&mode=view&no=1002986361&searchKeyword=%EC%BB%B5%EB%B0%A5.
  29. Pae MK. Dietary habits and perception toward food additives according to the frequency of consumption of convenience food at convenience stores among university students in Cheongju. Korean J Community Nutr 2016; 21(2): 140-151. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.2.140
  30. Lee KA, Cho EJ, Yoon HS. A study on consumption of convenience foods of university students by residing types in Changwon and Masan area. J Korean Diet Assoc 2010; 16(3): 279-290.
  31. Jeong YA. A study on HMR consumption by food-related lifestyle of adults in Jeju [dissertation]. Jeju: Jeju National University; 2016.
  32. Korean Statistical Information Service (KR). Household income and expenditure trends in the fourth quarter of 2021 [Internet]. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2022 Feb 24 [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1L9U001&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=G_A_10_003_001&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE&path=%252FstatisticsList%252FstatisticsListIndex.do.
  33. Kang JH. Effect of experienced value of HMR food using rice on positive image formation and repurchase intention. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2018; 32(5): 189-207. https://doi.org/10.21298/ijthr.2018.05.32.5.189