한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

오픈액세스논문 통합서비스플랫폼의 경제성 평가

An Economic Evaluation of an Integrated Service Platform of Open Access Research Papers

  • 권나현 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 표순희 (숭의여자대학교 문헌정보과) ;
  • 이정연 (중부대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김완종 (한국과학기술정보연구원) ;
  • 문선웅 (명지대학교 국제통상학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.18
  • 심사 : 2022.08.18
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국과학기술정보연구원의 OA논문 통합서비스플랫폼(Discover)에 대한 비용편익분석을 통해 사업의 경제성 평가를 수행하였다. 학술연구자 1,313명, 바이오산업 연구개발자 49명, 일반 산업체 연구개발자 102명 등 서비스 수혜 집단별로 설문조사를 실시하여 편익측정에 필요한 기초자료를 수집하였다. 시스템 구축과 운영에 소요되는 비용, 직접편익과 간접편익을 추정한 후, 이를 토대로 비용편익분석과 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 우선 직접 편익에 한정한 비용편익분석 결과, 총 8년간 사업에 투입된 사업투자비용(약 56.3억)의 약 14배인 820억 원의 편익이 발생할 것으로 추정되었다. 직간접편익을 합산한 비용편익분석 결과 역시 BCR이 최소 98.9, NPV는 5,388억 원 등으로 추정되어 사업의 경제적 타당성이 충분히 확보되었다. 본 분석 결과는 국가 차원의 OA논문 통합서비스플랫폼 개발 및 구축의 타당성 확보에 기여할 수 있으며, 본 연구에서 개발된 편익추정모형은 향후 사업 진행 과정에서 평가도구로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

An economic evaluation was conducted using cost-benefit analysis for an integrated service platform of open access research articles. The data needed for benefit measurement were collected by conducting a series of surveys to service beneficiaries, including 1,313 academic researchers, 49 bio-industry researchers, and 102 researchers in various industries. Cost-benefit analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted after estimating the total costs for system construction and operations, anticipated direct and indirect benefits. With respect to the cost-benefit analysis limited to direct benefits, the estimated benefit was KRW 82 billion, which is about 14 times of the total costs for eight years of the entire business period. With respect to the cost-benefit analysis for both direct and indirect benefits, BCR was estimated to be about 98.9 and NPV to be KRW 538.8 billion, indicating that economic feasibility of the project was sufficiently secured. The results of this analysis may help securing the investment to the integrated service platform for OA research products, and the benefit estimation model developed in this study would be utilized as an assessment tool during the rest of this project.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bank of Korea (2019). 2015 Input-Output Statistics. Available: https://www.bok.or.kr/portal/bbs/P0001588/view.do?nttId=10053355&menuNo=200457
  2. Joung, KyoungHee, Lee, Jae Yun, Chung, EunKyung, & Choi, Sanghee (2020). A study on methods of implementation for the NRF open access policy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(4), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.4.255
  3. Kim, GyuHwan, Lee, Soo-Sang, Lee, Jae Yun, Joung, KyoungHee, Kang, Heekyung, Seo, Sang Won, Jang, Sang-Hyun, Kim, Dongwoo, & Park, Yeonhee (2020). A Study on the Publication and Distribution Model for Revitalizing Open Access to Domestic Academic Journals. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  4. Kim, Kwang-Seok, Oh, Dong-Geun, & Yeo Ji-suk (2012). Cost benefit analysis of foreign research information centers. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(1), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.1.201203.287
  5. Kim, Tae Yoon & Kim, Sang-bong (2004). Theory and Practice of Cost-benefit Analysis: Public Project Evaluation and Regulatory Impact Analysis. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  6. Korea Biotechnology Association (2020). 2019 Report on the Results of a Survey on the Status of the Domestic Bio Industry. Available: https://www.koreabio.org/board/board.php?bo_table=statistics
  7. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2010). Analysis of the Economic Value of the KESLI Consortium Business.
  8. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2022). About AccessON. AccessON National Open Access Platform homepage. Available: https://accesson.kisti.re.kr/guide/koar/intro.do
  9. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Planning and Evaluation (2018). National R&D Project Preliminary Feasibility Study Operation Guidelines. Article 6 (Definition of Total Project Cost). Available: https://www.law.go.kr/행정규칙/국가연구개발사업예비타당성조사운용지침/(3,20190603)
  10. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Planning and Evaluation (2020). 2019 Research and Development Activity Survey. Available: https://www.kistep.re.kr/board.es?mid=a10305080000&bid=0002&act=view&list_no=25249&tag=&nPage=2
  11. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2020), KISTEP Statistical Brief, No. 19. Current Status of R&D Investment in Korea and Major Countries in 2020. Available: https://www.kistep.re.kr/board.es?mid=a10306030000&bid=0031&list_no=42452&act=view
  12. Min, Yoonkyung & Cha, Mikyeong (2017). A study on the open access policy of scholarly journals publishing research papers funded by Korean government. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.155
  13. National Research Foundation of Korea (2015). Analysis of Economic Value and Social Effect of KCI Business.
  14. Noh, Hwa-Joon (2004). Policy Analysis for Planning and Decision-Making (2nd edition). Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  15. Statistics Korea (2020). KOSIS Business Activity Survey (10th revision) Major indicators by industry category. Available: https://kosis.kr/common/meta_onedepth.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&listid=J2_7
  16. Fell, M. J. (2019). The economic impacts of open science: a rapid evidence assessment. Publications, 7(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030046
  17. Gruber, J. (2007). Chapter 8. Cost-benefit analysis. In Public Finance and Public Policy, 201-223.
  18. Houghton, J. W. (2009). Open access: what are the economic benefits? a comparison of the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Denmark. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492578
  19. Houghton, J. W., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M. A., & Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: Exploring the costs and benefits. JISC EI-ASPM Project. A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Economic-implications-of-alternative-scholarly-%3A-A-Houghton-Rasmussen/9a3eae6b1ebc6529518aa77ea034a73a292b6cb8
  20. Hwang, H., Seo, T., Han, Y., & Ko, S. (2019). Estimating the impacts of investment in a national open repository on funded research output in South Korea. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2019.7.1.4
  21. JISC, Open University(2022). CORE Homepage. Available: https://core.ac.uk/
  22. Jubb, M. (2011). Heading for the open road: Costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly communications. Liber Quarterly. 21(1): 102-124. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8010
  23. Look, H. & Marsh, K. (2012). Benefits of open access to scholarly research to the public sector. London: Joint Information Systems Committee. Available: https://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/e/e3/Report-to-oauk-benefits-of-open-access-public-sector.pdf
  24. Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A