DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생활화학제품의 알레르기반응가능 향료성분 함유 현황 및 동시 출현 패턴 조사

Characteristics and Co-Occurrence Patterns of Fragrance Allergens in Consumer Chemical Products

  • 김수민 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과) ;
  • 이기영 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과) ;
  • 임미영 (서울대학교 보건환경연구소)
  • Kim, Soomin (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Miyoung (Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.01
  • 심사 : 2022.08.09
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31

초록

Background: Fragrance substances in consumer products can cause adverse health effects such as contact allergy. In South Korea, consumer chemical products must list 26 known fragrance allergens on product labels when they contain more than 0.01%. Fragrance substances are mostly used in combination, so co-exposure can occur via use of a consumer chemical product. Co-exposure to fragrance allergens may show a synergistic effect on the human body. Objectives: The aims of the study were to analyze the characteristics of fragrance allergens in consumer chemical products available on public websites and to identify the co-occurrence patterns of fragrance allergens. Methods: The chemicals in 1,443 ingredient disclosures for consumer chemical products were collected through the Ecolife database. The 26 labelled fragrance allergens were identified by category of consumer chemical product. The co-occurrence patterns of the 26 labelled fragrance allergens were analyzed by frequent pattern mining. The unlabelled fragrance allergens presented by European Union Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety were also identified. Results: Consumer chemical products contained an average of 5.3±4.2 substances among the 26 labelled fragrance allergens. More than 85% of air fresheners, deodorizing agents, and fabric softeners contained at least one of the 26 labelled fragrance allergens. The most frequently contained fragrance allergens were limonene (50.5%), linalool (49.9%), hexyl cinnamal (34.0%), and citronellol (28.3%). 16.7% of consumer chemical products showed a co-occurrence of limonene, linalool, hexyl cinnamal, and citronellol. Thirty-eight unlabelled fragrance allergens were found in the consumer chemical products, with hexamethylindanopyran (25.2%) being the most frequently contained substance. Conclusions: The characteristics and co-occurrence patterns of 26 labelled fragrance allergens would be useful information for the management of co-exposure to fragrance allergens in consumer chemical products. It is necessary for attention to be paid to unlabelled fragrance allergens.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 생활화학제품 안전관리 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다(과제번호: 2021002970003, NTIS: 1485017937).

참고문헌

  1. Steinemann A. Fragranced consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2016; 9(8): 861-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-016-0442-z
  2. Alrasheed M, Albalawi O, Aljallal M, Alqahtani AS. Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported perfume sensitivity in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(10): 1248.
  3. Millqvist E, Lowhagen O. Placebo-controlled challenges with perfume in patients with asthma-like symptoms. Allergy. 1996; 51(6): 434-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04644.x
  4. Elberling J, Linneberg A, Dirksen A, Johansen JD, Frolund L, Madsen F, et al. Mucosal symptoms elicited by fragrance products in a population-based sample in relation to atopy and bronchial hyperreactivity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005; 35(1): 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02138.x
  5. van Amerongen CCA, Ofenloch RF, Cazzaniga S, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Naldi L, et al. Skin exposure to scented products used in daily life and fragrance contact allergy in the European general population - the EDEN Fragrance Study. Contact Dermatitis. 2021; 84(6): 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13807
  6. Kumar M, Devi A, Sharma M, Kaur P, Mandal UK. Review on perfume and present status of its associated allergens. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021; 20(2): 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13507
  7. Audrain H, Kenward C, Lovell CR, Green C, Ormerod AD, Sansom J, et al. Allergy to oxidized limonene and linalool is frequent in the U.K. Br J Dermatol. 2014; 171(2): 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13037
  8. Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Antelmi A, Bergendorff O, Bjork J, et al. Contact allergy to oxidized linalool and oxidized limonene: Patch testing in consecutive patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2022; 86(1): 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13980
  9. Brared Christensson J, Karlberg AT, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Johansen JD, Garcia-Bravo B, et al. Oxidized limonene and oxidized linalool - concomitant contact allergy to common fragrance terpenes. Contact Dermatitis. 2016; 74(5): 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12545
  10. Corsini E, Galbiati V. Contact allergy to fragrances: in vitro opportunities for safety assessment. Cosmetics. 2019; 6(1): 3.
  11. Lee I, Na M, O'Brien D, Parakhia R, Alepee N, Westerink W, et al. Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of fragrance ingredients using the U-SENSTM assay. Toxicol In Vitro. 2022; 79: 105298.
  12. European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products. Luxembourg: European Union; 2009.
  13. European Union. Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on Detergents. Luxembourg: European Union; 2004.
  14. Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Regulation No. 2022-33 of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety on Labeling of Attention in Using the Cosmetics and Allergic Ingredients. Cheongju: MFDS; 2022.
  15. Korea Ministry of Environment. Regulation No. 2022-19 of the Ministry of Environment on Designation, Safety and Labeling Standards of Consumer Chemical Products Subject to Safety Verification. Sejong: Ministry of Environment; 2022.
  16. European Union, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetic Products. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_073.pdf [accessed 25 May 2022].
  17. Uter W, Johansen JD, Borje A, Karlberg AT, Liden C, Rastogi S, et al. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69(4): 196-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12117
  18. Rey A, Corbi E, Peres C, David N. Determination of suspected fragrance allergens extended list by two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in ready-to-inject samples. J Chromatogr A. 2015; 1404: 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.05.045
  19. European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Impact Assessment study on Fragrance Labelling on Cosmetic Products: Final Report. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/193428 [accessed 25 May 2022].
  20. Basketter DA, Lemoine S, McFadden JP. Skin sensitisation to fragrance ingredients: is there a role for household cleaning/maintenance products? Eur J Dermatol. 2015; 25(1): 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2014.2472
  21. Nijkamp MM, Bokkers BG, Bakker MI, Ezendam J, Delmaar JE. Quantitative risk assessment of the aggregate dermal exposure to the sensitizing fragrance geraniol in personal care products and household cleaning agents. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015; 73(1): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.004
  22. Safford B, Api AM, Barratt C, Comiskey D, Ellis G, McNamara C, et al. Application of the expanded Creme RIFM consumer exposure model to fragrance ingredients in cosmetic, personal care and air care products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017; 86: 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.02.021
  23. Uter W, Yazar K, Kratz EM, Mildau G, Liden C. Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69(6): 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12125
  24. Wieck S, Olsson O, Kummerer K, Klaschka U. Fragrance allergens in household detergents. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018; 97: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.06.015
  25. Johansen JD, Skov L, Volund A, Andersen K, Menne T. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139(2): 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02363.x
  26. Bonefeld CM, Nielsen MM, Rubin IM, Vennegaard MT, Dabelsteen S, Gimenez-Arnau E, et al. Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 65(6): 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01945.x
  27. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Fragrance mix I and II: results of breakdown tests. Flavour Fragr J. 2015; 30(4): 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3247
  28. van Oosten EJ, Schuttelaar ML, Coenraads PJ. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis. 2009; 61(4): 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01605.x
  29. Korea Ministry of Environment. Act No. 18170 on the Consumer Chemical Products and Biocides Safety Control. Sejong: Ministry of Environment; 2021.
  30. Korea Ministry of Environment. Living Environment Safety System. Available: https://ecolife.me.go.kr/ecolife/ [accessed 2 May 2022].
  31. Bergeson LL. The rise of ingredient disclosure: the California and New York experience. Environ Qual Manag. 2019; 28(3): 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21610
  32. Lee I, Lee S, Ji K. A screening method to identify potential endocrine disruptors using chemical toxicity big data and a deep learning model with a focus on cleaning and laundry products. J Environ Health Sci. 2021; 47(5): 462-471. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2021.47.5.462
  33. Lee J, Kim S. Corporate responsibility for consumer chemical products in Korea. J Environ Health Sci. 2019; 45(4): 321-325.
  34. CAS Common Chemistry. Available: https://commonchemistry.cas.org [accessed 2 May 2022].
  35. Hahsler M, Buchta C, Gruen B, Hornik K, Borgelt C, Johnson I, et al. arules: Mining Association Rules and Frequent Itemsets. R Package Version 1.7-3. 2022. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arules [accessed 27 May 2022].
  36. Zaki MJ, Parthasarathy S, Ogihara M, Li W. New Algorithms for Fast Discovery of Association Rules. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-97). 1997:283-286. Available: https://www.aaai.org/Papers/KDD/1997/KDD97-060.pdf [accessed 27 May 2022].
  37. Buckley DA. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157(2): 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08018.x
  38. Magnano M, Silvani S, Vincenzi C, Nino M, Tosti A. Contact allergens and irritants in household washing and cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis. 2009; 61(6): 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01647.x
  39. Yazar K, Johnsson S, Lind ML, Boman A, Liden C. Preservatives and fragrances in selected consumer-available cosmetics and detergents. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 64(5): 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01828.x
  40. Gerster FM, Vernez D, Wild PP, Hopf NB. Hazardous substances in frequently used professional cleaning products. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014; 20(1): 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000052
  41. Lim M, Lee K. Aggregate exposure assessment using cosmetic co-use scenarios: I. Establishment of aggregate exposure scenarios. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020; 142: 111486.
  42. Kim S, Seo M, Na M, Kim J. Investigation on combined inhalation exposure scenarios to biocidal mixtures: biocidal and household chemical products in South Korea. Toxics. 2021; 9(2): 32.