Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제55권6호
  • /
  • Pages.760-766
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms

  • Jae Sun Song (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Byung Sun Kim (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Min A Yang (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Young Jae Lee (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Gum Mo Jung (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Ji Woong Kim (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center) ;
  • Jin Woong Cho (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.03
  • 심사 : 2022.02.09
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting gastric adenomas and adenocarcinomas. A significant discrepancy was observed between endoscopic and pathological sizes in samples obtained from patients undergoing ESD. This study elucidates the factors affecting size discrepancy after formalin fixation. Methods: The records of 64 patients with 69 lesions were analyzed, including 50 adenomas and 19 adenocarcinomas. Data on location, gross shape, histology, and size after fixation in formalin were collected. Results: The mean size of the resected specimen appeared to decrease after formalin fixation (37.5 mm prefixation vs. 35.8 mm postfixation, p<0.05). The mean long axis diameter of the lesions was 20.3±7.9 mm prefixation and 13.4±7.9 mm postfixation. Size differences in lesions smaller than 20 mm were significantly greater than those in lesions larger than 20 mm (7.6±5.6 mm vs. 2.5±5.8 mm, p<0.01). In multivariate analysis, a tumor size of ≥20 mm was found to be an independent factor affecting size postformalin fixation (p<0.05). Conclusions: The endoscopic size of lesions before ESD may be underestimated in tumors larger than 20 mm in size. Therefore, increased attention must be paid during ESD to avoid instances of incomplete resection.

키워드

과제정보

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all the doctors and nurses of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center in the Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.

참고문헌

  1. Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1228-1235. 
  2. Min BH, Kim ER, Kim KM, et al. Surveillance strategy based on the incidence and patterns of recurrence after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2015;47:784-793. 
  3. Siu KF, Cheung HC, Wong J. Shrinkage of the esophagus after resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;203:173-176. 
  4. Goldstein NS, Soman A, Sacksner J. Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements: the effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:349-351. 
  5. Kim EH, Park JC, Song IJ, et al. Prediction model for non-curative resection of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:976-983.
  6. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000;3:219-225. 
  7. Cho JW. The role of endosonography in the staging of gastrointestinal cancers. Clin Endosc 2015;48:297-301. 
  8. Shim CN, Song MK, Kang DR, et al. Size discrepancy between endoscopic size and pathologic size is not negligible in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2199-2207. 
  9. Asada-Hirayama I, Kodashima S, Goto O, et al. Factors predictive of inaccurate determination of horizontal extent of intestinal-type early gastric cancers during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective analysis. Dig Endosc 2013;25:593-600. 
  10. Sohn YJ, Jang JS, Choi SR, et al. Early detection of recurrence after endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:1109-1114. 
  11. Yamamoto Y, Fujisaki J, Hirasawa T, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection of undifferentiated-type intramucosal gastric cancer without ulceration and preoperatively diagnosed as 20 millimetres or less in diameter. Dig Endosc 2010;22:112-118. 
  12. Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:492-496. 
  13. Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS, et al. Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:496-500. 
  14. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U, et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:497-502. 
  15. Yun GW, Kim JH, Lee YC, et al. What are the risk factors for residual tumor cells after endoscopic complete resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia? Surg Endosc 2015;29:487-492. 
  16. Kim SB, Lee SH, Bae SI, et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori status and metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:9794-9802.