Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제55권5호
  • /
  • Pages.655-664
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions

  • Daisuke Ide (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Tomohiko Richard Ohya (Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Mitsuaki Ishioka (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Yuri Enomoto (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Eisuke Nakao (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Yuki Mitsuyoshi (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Junki Tokura (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Keigo Suzuki (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Seiichi Yakabi (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Chihiro Yasue (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Akiko Chino (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Masahiro Igarashi (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Akio Nakashima (Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Masayuki Saruta (Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shoichi Saito (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Junko Fujisaki (Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.26
  • 심사 : 2022.02.04
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions. Methods: We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events. Results: En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm2/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group. Conclusions: PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank all our exceptional colleagues at the Department of Gastroenterology for the clinical management of the patients.

참고문헌

  1. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015;47:829-854. 
  2. Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/local recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2006;38:996-1000. 
  3. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:1217-1225. 
  4. Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012;44:137-150. 
  5. Lee SP, Kim JH, Sung IK, et al. Effect of submucosal fibrosis on endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors: pathologic review of 173 cases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:872-878. 
  6. Sato K, Ito S, Kitagawa T, et al. Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2959-2965. 
  7. Holmes I, Kim HG, Yang DH, et al. Avulsion is superior to argon plasma coagulation for treatment of visible residual neoplasia during EMR of colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84:822-829. 
  8. von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection using a grasp-and-snare technique. Endoscopy 2010;42:475-480. 
  9. de Melo SW Jr, Cleveland P, Raimondo M, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with the grasp-and-snare technique through a double-channel endoscope in humans. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:349-352. 
  10. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010;24:343-352. 
  11. Ide D, Saito S, Chino A, et al. Submucosal pocket creation using a traction device in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Ann Gastroenterol 2018;31:380. 
  12. Ide D, Ohya TR, Saito S, et al. Clinical utility of the pocket-creation method with a traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2021;35:2110-2118. 
  13. Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S, et al. Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010;45:1329-1337. 
  14. Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Tanaka S, et al. Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1275-1284. 
  15. Imai K, Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Preoperative indicators of failure of en bloc resection or perforation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: implications for lesion stratification by technical difficulties during stepwise training. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:954-962. 
  16. Kobayashi R, Hirasawa K, Ikeda R, et al. The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue. Endosc Int Open 2017;5:E1242-E1250. 
  17. Rahmi G, Tanaka S, Ohara Y, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent superficial colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. J Dig Dis 2015;16:14-21. 
  18. Zhou P, Yao L, Qin X, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent colorectal lesions after previous endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:305-310. 
  19. Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Treatment strategy for recurrent or residual colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 2011;25:255-260. 
  20. Faller J, Jacques J, Oung B, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with double clip and rubber band traction for residual or locally recurrent colonic lesions after previous endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2020;52:383-388. 
  21. Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, et al. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:1045-1053. 
  22. Thorlacius H, Ronnow CF, Toth E. European experience of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review of clinical efficacy and safety. Acta Oncol 2019;58:S10-S14. 
  23. Kuroki Y, Hoteya S, Mitani T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/locally recurrent lesions after endoscopic therapy for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:1747-1753. 
  24. Kim HG, Thosani N, Banerjee S, et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:1094-1102. 
  25. von Helden A, Hildenbrand R, Sido B, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device for treatment of recurrent / residual colorectal neoplasia: a single-center case series. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:121. 
  26. Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B, et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 2018;67:1280-1289. 
  27. Fukunaga Y, Tamegai Y, Chino A, et al. New technique of en bloc resection of colorectal tumor using laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperatively (laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery-colorectal). Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:267-271. 
  28. Tamegai Y, Fukunaga Y, Suzuki S, et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) to overcome the limitations of endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors. Endosc Int Open 2018;6:E1477-E1485.