대한치매학회지 (Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders)

대한치매학회 (Korean Dementia Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Between the Performances of Verbal and Nonverbal Fluency Tests in Discriminating Between Mild Cognitive Impairments and Alzheimer's Disease Patients and Their Brain Morphological Correlates

  • Seyul Kwak (Department of Psychology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Seong A Shin (Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hyunwoong Ko (Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Hairin Kim (Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Dae Jong Oh (Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Jung Hae Youn (Department of Art Therapy & Counseling Psychology, CHA University) ;
  • Jun-Young Lee (Department of Psychology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yu Kyeong Kim (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.16
  • 심사 : 2021.12.01
  • 발행 : 2022.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background and Purpose: Verbal and nonverbal fluency tests are the conventional methods for examining executive function in the elderly population. However, differences in impairments result in fluency tests in patients with mild cognitive impairments (MCIs) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in neural correlates underlying the tests still necessitate concrete evidence. Methods: We compared the test performances in 27 normal controls, 28 patients with MCI, and 20 with AD, and investigated morphological changes in association with the test performances using structural magnetic imaging. Results: Patients with AD performed poorly across all the fluency tests, and a receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed that only category fluency test discriminated all the 3 groups. Association, category, and design fluency tests involved temporal and frontal regions, while letter fluency involved the cerebellum and caudate. Conclusions: Category fluency is a reliable measure for screening patients with AD and MCI, and this efficacy might be related to morphological correlates that underlie semantic and executive processing.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MEST; grant No. NRF-2018R1A5A2025964 and NRF-2014M3C7A1046042).

참고문헌

  1. Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Graham N, Dawson K, Hodges JR. Homogeneity and heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of 55 cases. Brain 2003;126:2350-2362.
  2. Royall DR, Lauterbach EC, Kaufer D, Malloy P, Coburn KL, Black KJ, et al. The cognitive correlates of functional status: a review from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2007;19:249-265.
  3. Grober E, Hall C, McGinn M, Nicholls T, Stanford S, Ehrlich A, et al. Neuropsychological strategies for detecting early dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2008;14:130-142.
  4. Elliott R. Executive functions and their disorders. Br Med Bull 2003;65:49-59.
  5. Chan RC, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen EY. Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008;23:201-216.
  6. Faria CA, Alves HV, Charchat-Fichman H. The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging. Dement Neuropsychol 2015;9:149-155.
  7. Nutter-Upham KE, Saykin AJ, Rabin LA, Roth RM, Wishart HA, Pare N, et al. Verbal fluency performance in amnestic MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008;23:229-241.
  8. Peter J, Kaiser J, Landerer V, Kostering L, Kaller CP, Heimbach B, et al. Category and design fluency in mild cognitive impairment: performance, strategy use, and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia 2016;93:21-29.
  9. Tallberg IM, Ivachova E, Jones Tinghag K, Ostberg P. Swedish norms for word fluency tests: FAS, animals and verbs. Scand J Psychol 2008;49:479-485.
  10. Benton AL. Development of a multilingual aphasia battery. Progress and problems. J Neurol Sci 1969;9:39-48.
  11. Ruff RM, Allen CC, Farrow CE, Niemann H, Wylie T. Figural fluency: differential impairment in patients with left versus right frontal lobe lesions. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1994;9:41-55.
  12. Rinehardt E, Eichstaedt K, Schinka JA, Loewenstein DA, Mattingly M, Fils J, et al. Verbal fluency patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2014;38:1-9.
  13. Auriacombe S, Lechevallier N, Amieva H, Harston S, Raoux N, Dartigues JF. A longitudinal study of quantitative and qualitative features of category verbal fluency in incident Alzheimer's disease subjects: results from the PAQUID study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;21:260-266.
  14. Henry JD, Crawford JR, Phillips LH. Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:1212-1222.
  15. Murphy KJ, Rich JB, Troyer AK. Verbal fluency patterns in amnestic mild cognitive impairment are characteristic of Alzheimer's type dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006;12:570-574.
  16. Lonie JA, Herrmann LL, Tierney KM, Donaghey C, O'Carroll R, Lee A, et al. Lexical and semantic fluency discrepancy scores in aMCI and early Alzheimer's disease. J Neuropsychol 2009;3:79-92.
  17. Baldo JV, Shimamura AP. Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology 1998;12:259-267.
  18. Baldo JV, Schwartz S, Wilkins D, Dronkers NF. Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006;12:896-900. 
  19. Mummery CJ, Patterson K, Hodges JR, Wise RJ. Generating 'tiger' as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation. Proc Biol Sci 1996;263:989-995.
  20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group* under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-944.
  21. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E, Tangelos EG. Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9 Suppl 1:65-69.
  22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
  23. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993;43:2412-2414.
  24. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 2007;38:95-113.
  25. Mok EH, Lam LC, Chiu HF. Category verbal fluency test performance in Chinese elderly with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;18:120-124.
  26. Isaacs B, Kennie AT. The Set test as an aid to the detection of dementia in old people. Br J Psychiatry 1973;123:467-470.
  27. Adlam AL, Bozeat S, Arnold R, Watson P, Hodges JR. Semantic knowledge in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease. Cortex 2006;42:675-684.
  28. Joubert S, Felician O, Barbeau EJ, Didic M, Poncet M, Ceccaldi M. Patterns of semantic memory impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Behav Neurol 2008;19:35-40.
  29. Fama R, Sullivan EV, Shear PK, Cahn-Weiner DA, Marsh L, Lim KO, et al. Structural brain correlates of verbal and nonverbal fluency measures in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 2000;14:29-40.
  30. Ting SK, Hameed S, Earnest A, Tan EK. Dissociative semantic breakdown in Alzheimer's disease: evidence from multiple category fluency test. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1049-1051.
  31. Giffard B, Desgranges B, Nore-Mary F, Lalevee C, Beaunieux H, de la Sayette V, et al. The dynamic time course of semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: clues from hyperpriming and hypopriming effects. Brain 2002;125:2044-2057.
  32. Duong A, Whitehead V, Hanratty K, Chertkow H. The nature of lexico-semantic processing deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:1928-1935.
  33. Ready RE, Ott BR, Grace J, Cahn-Weiner DA. Apathy and executive dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003;11:222-228.
  34. Van Der Flier WM, Van Den Heuvel DM, Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Spilt A, Bollen EL, Westendorp RG, et al. Cognitive decline in AD and mild cognitive impairment is associated with global brain damage. Neurology 2002;59:874-879.
  35. Hirshorn EA, Thompson-Schill SL. Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:2547-2557.
  36. Katzev M, Tuscher O, Hennig J, Weiller C, Kaller CP. Revisiting the functional specialization of left inferior frontal gyrus in phonological and semantic fluency: the crucial role of task demands and individual ability. J Neurosci 2013;33:7837-7845.
  37. Fjell AM, McEvoy L, Holland D, Dale AM, Walhovd KB; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer's disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog Neurobiol 2014;117:20-40.
  38. Grogan A, Green DW, Ali N, Crinion JT, Price CJ. Structural correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency ability in first and second languages. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:2690-2698.
  39. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-S219.
  40. Biesbroek JM, van Zandvoort MJE, Kappelle LJ, Velthuis BK, Biessels GJ, Postma A. Shared and distinct anatomical correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency revealed by lesion-symptom mapping in patients with ischemic stroke. Brain Struct Funct 2016;221:2123-2134.
  41. Mion M, Patterson K, Acosta-Cabronero J, Pengas G, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Hong YT, et al. What the left and right anterior fusiform gyri tell us about semantic memory. Brain 2010;133:3256-3268.
  42. Birn RM, Kenworthy L, Case L, Caravella R, Jones TB, Bandettini PA, et al. Neural systems supporting lexical search guided by letter and semantic category cues: a self-paced overt response fMRI study of verbal fluency. Neuroimage 2010;49:1099-1107.
  43. Schmidt CS, Nitschke K, Bormann T, Romer P, Kummerer D, Martin M, et al. Dissociating frontal and temporal correlates of phonological and semantic fluency in a large sample of left hemisphere stroke patients. Neuroimage Clin 2019;23:101840.
  44. Pasquier F, Lebert F, Grymonprez L, Petit H. Verbal fluency in dementia of frontal lobe type and dementia of Alzheimer type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;58:81-84.
  45. Benton AL. Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 1968;6:53-60.
  46. Jones-Gotman M, Milner B. Design fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia 1977;15:653-674.
  47. Miceli G, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, Masullo C, Silveri MC. Neuropsychological correlates of localized cerebral lesions in non-aphasic brain-damaged patients. J Clin Neuropsychol 1981;3:53-63.
  48. Possin KL, Chester SK, Laluz V, Bostrom A, Rosen HJ, Miller BL, et al. The frontal-anatomic specificity of design fluency repetitions and their diagnostic relevance for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012;18:834-44.
  49. Gordon EM, Lynch CJ, Gratton C, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, Greene DJ, et al. Three distinct sets of connector hubs integrate human brain function. Cell Reports 2018;24:1687-1695.e4.