DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Scenedesmus sp. CHK0059 on Strawberry Microbiota Community

  • Cho, Gyeongjun (Research Institute of Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jo, Gyeong Seo (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Yejin (Department of Plant Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kwak, Youn-Sig (Research Institute of Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2022.05.12
  • Accepted : 2022.06.27
  • Published : 2022.07.28

Abstract

Microalgae are photosynthetic cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microorganisms, mainly living in the water. In agriculture, numerous studies have been conducted to utilize microalgae as a biostimulant resource. Scenedesmus has been known to be one such microalga that can promote plant growth by secretion of auxin or cytokinin hormone analogs. However, no research has been performed on the effect of microalgae treatment on plant microbiota communities. This study was conducted to investigate the mode of action of microalgae as biostimulants in a plant microbiota perspective by using Scenedesmus sp. CHK0059 (also known as species Chlorella fusca), which has been well documented as a biostimulant for strawberries. The strawberry cultivar Keumsil was bred with Seolhyang and Maehyang as the parent cultivars. Using these three cultivars, microbiota communities were evaluated for changes in structural composition according to the CHK0059 treatment. CHK0059-treated Seolhyang, and CHK0059-untreated Maehyang were similar in microbial diversity in the endosphere. From a microbiota community perspective, the diversity change showed that CHK0059 was affected by the characteristics of the host. Conversely, when CHK0059 treatment was applied, populations of Streptomyces and Actinospica were observed in the crown endosphere.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Rural Development Administration (PJ014934).

References

  1. Searchinger T, Waite R, Hanson C, Ranganathan J, Dumas P, Matthews, et al. 2019. Creating a sustainable food future: a menu of solutions to feed nearly 10 billion people by 2050. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  2. Renuka N, Guldhe A, Prasanna R, Singh P, Bux F. 2018. Microalgae as multi-functional options in modern agriculture: current trends, prospects and challenges. Biotechnol. Adv. 36: 1255-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.04.004
  3. Dineshkumar R, Subramanian J, Gopalsamy J, Jayasingam P, Arumugam A, Kannadasan S, et al. 2019. The impact of using microalgae as biofertilizer in maize (Zea mays L.). Waste Biomass Valorization 10: 1101-1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0123-7
  4. Martini F, Beghini G, Zanin L, Varanini Z, Zamboni A, Ballottari M. 2021. The potential use of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlorella sorokiniana as biostimulants on maize plants. Algal Res. 60: 102515.
  5. Kessler E, Schafer M, Hummer C, Kloboucek A, Huss VAR. 1997. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characters for the taxonomy of the subgenera of Scenedesmus (Chlorococcales, Chlorophyta). Botanica Acta 110: 244-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1997.tb00636.x
  6. Righini H, Francioso O, Martel Quintana A, Roberti R. 2022. Cyanobacteria: a natural source for controlling agricultural plant diseases caused by fungi and oomycetes and improving plant growth. Horticulturae 8: 58.
  7. Lee SM, Ryu CM. 2021. Algae as new kids in the beneficial plant microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. 12: 599742.
  8. Nedelcu AM, Lee RW, Lemieux C, Gray MW, Burger G. 2000. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of Scenedesmus obliquus reflects an intermediate stage in the evolution of the green algal mitochondrial genome. Genome Res. 10: 819-831. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.6.819
  9. Navarro-Lopez E, Ruiz-Nieto A, Ferreira A, Acien, FG, Gouveia L. 2020. Biostimulant potential of Scenedesmus obliquus grown in brewery wastewater. Molecules 25: 664.
  10. Kim MJ, Shim CK, Ko BG, Kim J. 2020. Effect of the microalga Chlorella fusca CHK0059 on strawberry PGPR and biological control of Fusarium Wilt disease in non-pesticide hydroponic strawberry cultivation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 708-716 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2001.01015
  11. Kim SJ, Ko EJ, Hong JK, Jeun YC. 2018. Ultrastructures of Colletotrichum orbiculare in cucumber leaves expressing systemic acquired resistance mediated by Chlorella fusca. Plant Pathol. J. 34: 133-120.
  12. Lee SM, Kim SK, Lee N, Ahn CY, Ryu CM. 2020. D-lactic acid secreted by Chlorella fusca primes pattern-triggered immunity against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis. Plant Pathol. J. 102: 761-778.
  13. Lee SM, Lee B, Shim CK, Chang YK, Ryu CM. 2020. Plant anti-aging: delayed flower and leaf senescence in Erinus alpinus treated with cell-free Chlorella cultivation medium. Plant Signal Behav. 15: 1763005.
  14. Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. 2016. Microbes drive evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome concept. mBio 7: e01395-15.
  15. Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, et al. 2012. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11336
  16. Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. 2019. A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J. Adv. Res. 19: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
  17. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA. Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13: 581-583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
  18. Murali A, Bhargava A, Wright ES. 2018. IDTAXA: a novel approach for accurate taxonomic classification of microbiome sequences. Microbiome 6: 140.
  19. Lin H, Peddada SD. 2020. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11: 3514.
  20. Kublanovskaya A, Khapchaeva S, Zotov V, Zaytsev P, Lobakova E, Solovchenko A. 2019. The effect of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris Ippas C-1 biomass application on yield, biological activity, and the microbiome of the soil during bean growing. Mosco Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 74: 227-234.
  21. Rana A, Kabi SR, Verma S, Adak A, Pal M, Shivay YS, et al. 2015. Prospecting plant growth promoting bacteria and cyanobacteria as options for enrichment of macro-and micronutrients in grains in rice-wheat cropping sequence. Cogent Food Agric. 1:1037379.
  22. Wu Y, Santos SS, Vestergard M, Gonzalez AMM, Ma L, Feng Y, et al. 2022. A field study reveals links between hyperaccumulating Sedum plants-associated bacterial communities and Cd/Zn uptake and translocation. Sci. Total Environ. 805: 150400.
  23. Cha JY, Han S, Hong HJ, Cho H, Kim D, Kwon Y, et al. 2016. Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. ISME J. 10: 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.95
  24. Suarez-Moreno ZR, Vinchira-Villarraga DM, Vergara-Morales DI, Castellanos L, Ramos FA, Guarnaccia C, et al. 2019. Plant-growth promotion and biocontrol properties of three Streptomyces spp. isolates to control bacterial rice pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 10: 290.
  25. Kim DR, Cho G, Jeon CW, Weller DM, Thomashow LS, Paulitz TC, et al. 2019. A mutualistic interaction between Streptomyces bacteria, strawberry plants and pollinating bee. Nat. Commun. 10: 4802
  26. Kim DR, Kwak YS. 2021. A genome-wide analysis of antibiotic producing genes in Streptomyces globisporus SP6C4. Plant Pathol. J. 73: 389-395.
  27. Kim DR, Jeon CW, Cho G, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Paik MJ, et al. 2021. Glutamic acid reshaphes the plant microbiota to protec plants against pathogens. Microbiome 9: 244.