Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is dentin biomodification with collagen cross-linking agents effective for improving dentin adhesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Received : 2021.02.12
  • Accepted : 2021.04.23
  • Published : 2022.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking agents (CCLAs) used in combination with the adhesive technique in restorative procedures. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, the authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and DOSS, up to October 2020. The gray literature was also researched. Only randomized clinical trials were selected. Results: The selection process yielded 3 studies from the 838 retrieved. The addition of CCLAs in the retention of restorations increased the number of events. The postoperative sensitivity scores and marginal adaptation scores showed no significant difference between the CCLA and control groups, and the marginal pigmentation scores showed a significant increase in the CCLA group. There were no caries events in any group throughout the evaluation period. Conclusions: This systematic review showed that there is no clinical efficacy to justify the use of CCLAs in the protocols performed.

Keywords

References

  1. Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Cadenaro M. Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability--A literature review. Dent Mater 2016;32:e41-e53.
  2. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:447-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10364
  3. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002;81:472-476.
  4. Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater 2013;29:116-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004
  5. Bedran-Russo AK, Pauli GF, Chen SN, McAlpine J, Castellan CS, Phansalkar RS, Aguiar TR, Vidal CM, Napotilano JG, Nam JW, Leme AA. Dentin biomodification: strategies, renewable resources and clinical applications. Dent Mater 2014;30:62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.012
  6. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. a status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 2020;22:7-34.
  7. Singh P, Nagpal R, Singh UP, Manuja N. Effect of carbodiimide on the structural stability of resin/dentin interface. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:501-509. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.194020
  8. Al-Ammar A, Drummond JL, Bedran-Russo AK. The use of collagen cross-linking agents to enhance dentin bond strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:419-424.
  9. Fawzy AS, Nitisusanta LI, Iqbal K, Daood U, Neo J. Riboflavin as a dentin crosslinking agent: ultraviolet A versus blue light. Dent Mater 2012;28:1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.009
  10. Daood U, Swee Heng C, Neo Chiew Lian J, Fawzy AS. In vitro analysis of riboflavin-modified, experimental, two-step etch-and-rinse dentin adhesive: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and micro-Raman studies. Int J Oral Sci 2015;7:110-124. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2014.49
  11. De-Paula DM, Lomonaco D, Ponte AM, Cordeiro KE, Moreira MM, Mazzetto SE, Feitosa VP. Influence of collagen cross-linkers addition in phosphoric acid on dentin biomodification and bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Dent Mater 2020;36:e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.019
  12. de Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA, Feitosa VP, Santiago SL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Matos TP, Saboia VP, Perdigao J. Two-year clinical evaluation of proanthocyanidins added to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent 2019;81:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.012
  13. Costa C, Albuquerque N, Mendonca JS, Loguercio AD, Saboia V, Santiago SL. Catechin-based dentin pretreatment on the clinical performance of a universal adhesive: a two-year randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2020;45:473-483. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-088-C
  14. de Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA, Feitosa VP, Santiago SL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigao J, Saboia VP. Two-year clinical evaluation of a proanthocyanidins-based primer in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2020;96:103325.
  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
  16. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210.
  17. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017.
  18. Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Correa M. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20150310.
  19. Schunemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. [place unknown]: The GRADE Working Group; 2013.
  20. Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:173-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350510019874
  21. Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Oper Dent 2012;37:3-11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-222-C
  22. Aguiar TR, Vidal CM, Phansalkar RS, Todorova I, Napolitano JG, McAlpine JB, Chen SN, Pauli GF, Bedran-Russo AK. Dentin biomodification potential depends on polyphenol source. J Dent Res 2014;93:417-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514523783
  23. Bedran-Russo AK, Pashley DH, Agee K, Drummond JL, Miescke KJ. Changes in stiffness of demineralized dentin following application of collagen crosslinkers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:330-334.
  24. Cova A, Breschi L, Nato F, Ruggeri A Jr, Carrilho M, Tjaderhane L, Prati C, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Mazzoni A. Effect of UVA-activated riboflavin on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2011;90:1439-1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511423397
  25. Cai J, Palamara JE, Burrow MF. Effects of collagen crosslinkers on dentine: a literature review. Calcif Tissue Int 2018;102:265-279.
  26. Yun JH, Pang EK, Kim CS, Yoo YJ, Cho KS, Chai JK, Kim CK, Choi SH. Inhibitory effects of green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and on the formation of osteoclasts. J Periodontal Res 2004;39:300-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00743.x
  27. Jackson JK, Zhao J, Wong W, Burt HM. The inhibition of collagenase induced degradation of collagen by the galloyl-containing polyphenols tannic acid, epigallocatechin gallate and epicatechin gallate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010;21:1435-1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4019-3
  28. Du X, Huang X, Huang C, Wang Y, Zhang Y. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) enhances the therapeutic activity of a dental adhesive. J Dent 2012;40:485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.013
  29. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375
  30. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 2009;25:459-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008
  31. Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2014;39:113-127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-C
  32. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015;43:1229-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009
  33. Moreira MA, Souza NO, Sousa RS, Freitas DQ, Lemos MV, De Paula DM, Maia FJ, Lomonaco D, Mazzetto SE, Feitosa VP. Efficacy of new natural biomodification agents from Anacardiaceae extracts on dentin collagen cross-linking. Dent Mater 2017;33:1103-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.003
  34. Scheffel DL, Hebling J, Scheffel RH, Agee K, Turco G, de Souza Costa CA, Pashley D. Inactivation of matrix-bound matrix metalloproteinases by cross-linking agents in acid-etched dentin. Oper Dent 2014;39:152-158.
  35. Machado AC, Dezan Junior E, Gomes-Filho JE, Cintra LT, Ruviere DB, Zoccal R, Damante CA, Jardim Junior EG. Evaluation of tissue reaction to Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva) extracts: a histologic and edemogenic study. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:414-418. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000400005
  36. Santiago SL, Osorio R, Neri JR, Carvalho RM, Toledano M. Effect of the flavonoid epigallocatechin-3-gallate on resin-dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:535-540.
  37. Neri JR, Yamauti M, Da Silveira F, Mendonca JS, Carvalho RM, Santiago SL. Influence of dentin biomodification with epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the bond strength of self-etch adhesive: twelve-month results. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016;71:81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.08.007
  38. Zheng P, Chen H. Evaluate the effect of different MMPs inhibitors on adhesive physical properties of dental adhesives, bond strength and MMP substarte activity. Sci Rep 2017;7:4975-4980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04340-1
  39. Liu Y, Wang Y. Effect of proanthocyanidins and photo-initiators on photo-polymerization of a dental adhesive. J Dent 2013;41:71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.006
  40. Epasinghe DJ, Yiu CK, Burrow MF, Tay FR, King NM. Effect of proanthocyanidin incorporation into dental adhesive resin on resin-dentine bond strength. J Dent 2012;40:173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.013
  41. Epasinghe DJ, Yiu CK, Burrow MF. Mechanical properties, water sorption characteristics, and compound release of grape seed extract-incorporated resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:412-419. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0448
  42. Pallan S, Furtado Araujo MV, Cilli R, Prakki A. Mechanical properties and characteristics of developmental copolymers incorporating catechin or chlorhexidine. Dent Mater 2012;28:687-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.003
  43. Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjorndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, Van Landuyt K, Banerjee A, Campus G, Domejean S, Fontana M, Leal S, Lo E, Machiulskiene V, Schulte A, Splieth C, Zandona A, Schwendicke F. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Adv Dent Res 2016;28:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639276
  44. Perdigao J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:219-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12016
  45. Horsted-Bindslev P, Knudsen J, Baelum V. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent 1996;9:22-26.
  46. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Winkler MM, Mercante DE, Davidson JM. Two-year clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite using a fourth- and fifth-generation bonding agent. Oper Dent 2005;30:290-296.
  47. Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2019;27:e20180358.
  48. Chermont AB, Carneiro KK, Lobato MF, Machado SM, Silva e Souza Junior MH. Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:349-354. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000300015
  49. Cakir NN, Demirbuga S. The effect of five different universal adhesives on the clinical success of class I restorations: 24-month clinical follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:2767-2776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2708-3