DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimizing Fat Grafting Using a Hydraulic System Technique for Fat Processing: A Time and Cost Analysis

  • Verdura, Vincenzo (Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli") ;
  • Guastafierro, Antonio (Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli") ;
  • Di Pace, Bruno (Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana," PhD School of Translational Medicine of Development and Active Aging, University of Salerno) ;
  • Faenza, Mario (Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli") ;
  • Nicoletti, Giovanni Francesco (Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli") ;
  • Rubino, Corrado (Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari)
  • Published : 2022.03.15

Abstract

Background Many authors have researched ways to optimize fat grafting by looking for a technique that offers safe and long-term fat survival rate. To date, there is no standardized protocol. We designed a "hydraulic system technique" optimizing the relationship among the quantity of injected fat, operative time, and material cost to establish fat volume cutoffs for a single procedure. Methods Thirty-six patients underwent fat grafting surgery and were organized into three groups according to material used: standard, "1-track," and "2-tracks" systems. The amount of harvested and grafted fat as well as material used for each procedure was collected. Operating times were recorded and statistical analysis was performed to establish the relationship with the amount of treated fat. Results In 15 cases the standard system was used (mean treated fat 72 [30-100] mL, mean cost 4.23 ± 0.27 euros), in 11 cases the "1-track" system (mean treated fat 183.3 [120-280] mL, mean cost 7.63 ± 0.6 euros), and in 10 cases the "2-tracks" one (mean treated fat 311[220-550] mL, mean cost 12.47 ± 1 euros). The mean time difference between the standard system and the "1-track" system is statistically significant starting from three fat syringes (90 mL) in 17.66 versus 6.87 minutes. The difference between the "1-track" system and "2-tracks" system becomes statistically significant from 240 mL of fat in 15 minutes ("1-track") versus 9.3 minutes for the "2-tracks" system. Conclusion Data analysis would indicate the use of the standard system, "1-track," and "2-tracks" to treat an amount of fat < 90 mL of fat, 90 ÷ 240 mL of fat, and ≥ 240 mL of fat, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Conde-Green A, Marano AA, Lee ES, et al. Fat grafting and adipose-derived regenerative cells in burn wound healing and scarring: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137(01):302-312 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001918
  2. Guisantes E, Fontdevila J, Rodriguez G. Autologous fat grafting for correction of unaesthetic scars. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69(05):550-554 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821ee386
  3. Fournier PF. Liposculpture: My Technique. Paris: Arnette-Blackwell Editors; 1996
  4. Flynn TC, Coleman WP II, Field LM, Klein JA, Hanke CW. History of liposuction. Dermatol Surg 2000;26(06):515-520 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00066.x
  5. Illouz YG. History and current concepts of lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1996;23(04):721-730 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1298(20)32567-0
  6. Girard AC, Mirbeau S, Gence L, et al. Effect of washes and centrifugation on the efficacy of lipofilling with or without local anesthetic. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3(08):e496 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000465
  7. Botti G, Pascali M, Botti C, Bodog F, Cervelli V. A clinical trial in facial fat grafting: filtered and washed versus centrifuged fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(06):2464-2473 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131d5d
  8. Modarressi A. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) improves fat grafting outcomes. World J Plast Surg 2013;2(01):6-13
  9. Wu LW, Chen WL, Huang SM, Chan JY. Platelet-derived growth factor-AA is a substantial factor in the ability of adipose-derived stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells to enhance wound healing. FASEB J 2019;33(02):2388-2395 https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201800658r
  10. Rigotti G, Charles-de-Sa L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, et al. Expanded stem cells, Stromal-vascular fraction, and platelet-rich plasma enriched fat: comparing results of different facial rejuvenation approaches in a clinical trial. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36(03):261-270 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv231
  11. Maamari RN, Massry GG, Holds JB. Complications associated with fat grafting to the lower eyelid. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019;27(04):435-441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2019.07.001
  12. Seo DH, Shin JY, Roh SG, Chang SC, Lee NH. Non-tuberculous Mycobacterium infection after transfer of autologous fat to the face: a rare case. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;57(02):185-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.12.008
  13. Bianchi F, Maioli M, Leonardi E, et al. A new nonenzymatic method and device to obtain a fat tissue derivative highly enriched in pericyte-like elements by mild mechanical forces from human lipoaspirates. Cell Transplant 2013;22(11):2063-2077 https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X657855
  14. Rubino C, Marongiu F, Manzo MJ, et al. A simple and cheap system to speed up and to control the tumescent technique procedure: the Tedde's system. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014;18(11):1647-1648
  15. Morselli PG, Giorgini FA, Pazzini C, Muscari C. Lull pgm system: a suitable technique to improve the regenerative potential of autologous fat grafting. Wound Repair Regen 2017;25(04):722-729 https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12582
  16. Paolini G, Amoroso M, Longo B, Sorotos M, Karypidis D, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Simplified lipostructure: a technical note. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38(01):78-82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0254-6
  17. De Francesco F, Guastafierro A, Nicoletti G, Razzano S, Riccio M, Ferraro GA. The selective centrifugation ensures a better in vitro isolation of ASCs and restores a soft tissue regeneration in vivo. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(05):E1038
  18. Gupta R, Brace M, Taylor SM, Bezuhly M, Hong P. In search of the optimal processing technique for fat grafting. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(01):94-99 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001259
  19. Morselli PG, Micai A, Giorgini FA. "Lull pgm system" for autologous fat grafting: a simple closed system with minimal equipment and no extra cost. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4(08):e851 https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000807
  20. Zhu M, Cohen SR, Hicok KC, et al. Comparison of three different fat graft preparation methods: gravity separation, centrifugation, and simultaneous washing with filtration in a closed system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131(04):873-880 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828276e9
  21. Nordberg RC, Loboa EG. Our fat future: translating adipose stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Transl Med 2015;4(09):974-979 https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0071
  22. Cucchiani R, Corrales L. The effects of fat harvesting and preparation, air exposure, obesity, and stem cell enrichment on adipocyte viability prior to graft transplantation. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36(10):1164-1173 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw106
  23. Tremolada C, Colombo V, Ventura C. Adipose tissue and mesenchymal stem cells: state of the art and Lipogems® technology development. Curr Stem Cell Rep 2016;2:304-312 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-016-0053-5
  24. Rodriguez J, Pratta AS, Abbassi N, et al. Evaluation of three devices for the isolation of the stromal vascular fraction from adipose tissue and for ASC culture: a comparative study. Stem Cells Int 2017;2017:9289213 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9289213