DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Forgotten Entity following Breast Implant Contracture: Does Baker Need a Change?

  • Pagani, Andrea (Clinic and Policlinic of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar-Technische Universitat Munchen) ;
  • Aitzetmuller, Matthias M. (Section of Plastic Surgery, Department for Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Munster) ;
  • Larcher, Lorenz (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, SABES (South Tyrolean Health Care System))
  • Published : 2022.05.15

Abstract

Although capsular contracture represents one of the most important complications after breast augmentation, local inflammation and fibrosis can lead, to capsular calcification, an often-forgotten radiological sign of capsular contracture. In this article, the authors present a clinical case of breast implant calcification in an 81-year-old patient. Although this complication has been rarely described, the literature was reviewed to clarify the role of the local microenvironment in capsular contracture and calcification. At present, capsular contracture patients are classified using the conventional Baker score and the histological Wilflingseder classification. As it was not possible to consider capsular calcification when classifying our patient using the traditional scores, the authors propose an updated version of the current scale.

Keywords

References

  1. Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstein MJ. The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96(07):1521-1533 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199512000-00003
  2. Barr S, Hill E, Bayat A. Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty 2009;9:e22
  3. Ulrich D, Lichtenegger F, Eblenkamp M, Repper D, Pallua N. Matrix metalloproteinases, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, aminoterminal propeptide of procollagen type III, and hyaluronan in sera and tissue of patients with capsular contracture after augmentation with Trilucent breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(01):229-236 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000129079.19089.6C
  4. Peters W, Pritzker K, Smith D, et al. Capsular calcification associated with silicone breast implants: incidence, determinants, and characterization. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41(04):348-360 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199810000-00002
  5. Tan KT, Wijeratne D, Shih B, Baildam AD, Bayat A. Tumour necrosis factor-α expression is associated with increased severity of periprosthetic breast capsular contracture. Eur Surg Res 2010;45(3-4):327-332 https://doi.org/10.1159/000321009
  6. Prantl L, Angele P, Schreml S, Ulrich D, Poppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M. Determination of serum fibrosis indexes in patients with capsular contracture after augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(01):224-229 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000220462.28928.83
  7. Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42(05):532-543 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
  8. Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Tierney R, et al. The impact of Smad3 loss of function on TGF-β signaling and radiation-induced capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(06):2263-2269 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131bea
  9. Marques M, Brown SA, Cordeiro ND, et al. Effects of fibrin, thrombin, and blood on breast capsule formation in a preclinical model. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31(03):302-309 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11398351
  10. Sitbon E, ed. Fabrication des protheses mammaires: une industrie de haute technologie. Annales de chirurgie plastique esthetique Masson: Elsevier; 2005
  11. Gossner J. Sonography in capsular contracture after breast augmentation: value of established criteria, new techniques and directions for research. J Ultrasound 2016;20(01):87-89 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-016-0225-2
  12. Redfern AB, Ryan JJ, Su TC. Calcification of the fibrous capsule about mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59(02):249-251 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197759020-00012
  13. Cole NM. Consequences of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Directed Moratorium on Silicone Gel Breast Implants: 1992 to 2006. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141(05):1137-1141 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004284
  14. Basu B. Biomaterials Science and Implants: Status, Challenges and Recommendations. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2020
  15. Peters W, Smith D. Calcification of breast implant capsules: incidence, diagnosis, and contributing factors. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34(01):8-11 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199501000-00002
  16. Legrand AP, Marinov G, Pavlov S, et al. Degenerative mineralization in the fibrous capsule of silicone breast implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16(05):477-485
  17. Mendonca Munhoz A, Santanelli di Pompeo F, De Mezerville R. Nanotechnology, nanosurfaces and silicone gel breast implants: current aspects. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;4(01):99-113 https://doi.org/10.1080/23320885.2017.1407658
  18. Ramasamy M, Lee J. Recent nanotechnology approaches for prevention and treatment of biofilm-associated infections on medical devices. BioMed Res Int 2016;2016:1851242 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1851242
  19. Fradinho N, Varanda A, Martins JB, Martins PA. Heterotopic ossification in breast prosthesis. Eplasty 2015;15:ic7
  20. Raso DS, Greene WB, Kalasinsky VF, et al. Elemental analysis and clinical implications of calcification deposits associated with silicone breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42(02):117-123 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199902000-00001
  21. Prantl L. Serologic and Histologic Findings in Capsule Contracture Patients with Silicone Gel Implants. Breast Augmentation Springer; 2009:649-654
  22. Shah Z, Lehman JA Jr, Tan J. Does infection play a role in breast capsular contracture? Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68(01):34-42 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198107000-00007