Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Neutronic simulation of the CEFR experiments with the nodal diffusion code system RAST-F

  • Tran, Tuan Quoc (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Deokjung (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2022.01.23
  • Published : 2022.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

CEFR is a small core-size sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) using high enrichment fuel with stainless-steel reflectors, which brings a significant challenge to the deterministic methodologies due to the strong spectral effect. The neutronic simulation of the start-up experiments conducted at the CEFR have been performed with a deterministic code system RAST-F, which is based on the two-step approach that couples a multi-group cross-section generation Monte-Carlo (MC) code and a multi-group nodal diffusion solver. The RAST-F results were compared against the measurement data. Moreover, the characteristic of neutron spectrum in the fuel rings, and adjacent reflectors was evaluated using different models for generation of accurate nuclear libraries. The numerical solution of RAST-F system was verified against the full core MC solution MCS at all control rods fully inserted and withdrawn states. A good agreement between RAST-F and MCS solutions was observed with less than 120 pcm discrepancies and 1.2% root-mean-square error in terms of keff and power distribution, respectively. Meanwhile, the RAST-F result agreed well with the experimental values within two-sigma of experimental uncertainty. The good agreement of these results indicating that RAST-F can be used to neutronic steady-state simulations for small core-size SFR, which was challenged to deterministic code system.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT). (No.NRF-2017M2A8A2018595). The data and information presented in the paper are part of an ongoing IAEA coordinated research project on "Neutronics Benchmark of CEFR Start-Up Tests - CRP-I31032".

References

  1. X. Tianmin, L. Cunren, China experimental fast reactor, Control (176) (2007) 84-87.
  2. X. Huo, et al., Technical Specifications for Neutronics Benchmark of CEFR Start-Up Tests, IAEA CRP-I31032, CIAE, Beijing, 2019.
  3. Tran Tuan Quoc, Jiwon Choe, Xianan Du, Hyunsuk Lee, Deokjung Lee, Neutronic simulation of China experimental fast reactor start-up test- Part II: MCS Monte Carlo code calculation, Ann. Nucl. Energy 148 (2020).
  4. Xianan Du, Jiwon Choe, Tran Tuan Quoc, Deokjung Lee, Neutronic simulation of China experimental fast reactor start-up test. Part I: SARAX code deterministic calculation, Ann. Nucl. Energy 136 (2020).
  5. Tran Tuan Quoc, Alexey Cherezov, Xianan Du, Deokjung Lee, Verification of a two-step code system MCS/RAST-F to fast reactor core analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.10.038. In press.
  6. Nguyen Tung Dong Cao, Hyunsuk Lee, Deokjung Lee, Use of Monte Carlo code MCS for multigroup cross section generation for fast reactor analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (9) (2021) 2788-2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.03.005
  7. Tuan Tran Quoc, Siarhei Dzianisau, Nguyen Tung Dong Cao, Deokjung Lee, Verification of a Depletion Solver in RAST-K for Fast Reactor Analysis, KNS Winter Meeting, Korea, 2020 (online), Dec 16-18.
  8. R. E MacFarlane, D.W. Muir, R.M. Boicourt, The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, 1982. LA-9303-M (ENDF-324).
  9. J.Y. Cho, C.H. Kim, Higher Order Polynomial Expansion Nodal Method for Hexagonal Core Neutronics Analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 1998.
  10. J.Y. Cho, et al., Hexagonal CMFD Formulation Employing Triangle-Based Polynomial Expansion Nodal Kernel, M&C, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2001, 2001.
  11. Downar, et al., PARCS v3.0 U.S. NRC Core Neutronics Simulator Theory Manual, 2010. Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  12. A. Kavenoky, The SPH homogenization method, in: Proc.: A Specialists' Meeting on Homogenization Methods in Reactor Physics, IAEA-TECDOC-231, Lugano, Switzerland, 1978.
  13. Hyunsuk Lee, et al., MCS - A Monte Carlo Particle Transport Code for Large-Scale Power Reactor Analysis, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020. Article 107276.
  14. Vutheam Dos, Huynsuk Lee, Xianan Du, Deokjung Lee, MCS Analysis of 1000MWth Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor, ICAPP, France, 2019. May 12-15.
  15. Bamidele Ebiwonjumi, Nguyen Tung Dong Cao, Jiwon Choe, Deokjung Lee, MCS Analysis of IAEA Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Core Neutronics Benchmark, PHYSOR, Cancun, Mexico, 2018. April 22-26 (2018).
  16. Tuan Quoc Tran, Jiwon Choe, Xianan Du, Alexey Cherezov, Hyunsuk Lee, Deokjung Lee, Preliminary CEFR Analysis by Monte Carlo Codes, M&C, Oregon USA, 2019. August 25-29 (2019).
  17. Nhan Nguyen Trong Mai, Yunki Jo, Hyunsuk Lee, Alexey Cherezov, Deokjung Lee, Whole-core Monte Carlo Analysis of MOX-3600 Core in NEASFR Benchmark Using MCS Code, KNS Autumn Meeting, Yeosu, Korea, 2018. October 24-26.
  18. Mark B. Chadwick, et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and Technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data, Nucl. Data Sheets 112 (2011) 2887-2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002
  19. J.F. Lebrat, et al., Fast Reactor Core-Reflector Interface Effects Revisited, in: Proc. PHYSOR 2002, Seoul, 2002.
  20. G. Aliberti, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, Spectral Effects at Core-Reflector Interface in Fast Neutron Systems", ANS Summer Meeting, San Diego (CA), June 2002.
  21. E. Fridman, E. Shwageraus, Modeling of SFR Cores with Serpent-Dyn3d Codes Sequence, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 2013.
  22. X. Yang, et al., The First Criticality Test of CEFR, International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE21, Chengdu, China, 2013.