DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Emergence and Structure of Complex Mutualistic Networks

  • Lee, KyoungEun (Team of Vulnerable Ecological Research, Division of Climate and Ecology, Bureau of Conservation and Assessment Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Jung, Nam (Team of Vulnerable Ecological Research, Division of Climate and Ecology, Bureau of Conservation and Assessment Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Min (Team of Vulnerable Ecological Research, Division of Climate and Ecology, Bureau of Conservation and Assessment Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Maeng, Seung Eun (Bizdata R&D Center) ;
  • Lee, Jae Woo (Department of Physics, Inha University)
  • Received : 2021.11.12
  • Accepted : 2022.01.17
  • Published : 2022.08.01

Abstract

The degree distribution of the plant-pollinator network was identified by analyzing the data in the ecosystem and reproduced by a model of the growing bipartite mutualistic networks. The degree distribution of pollinator shows power law or stretched exponential distribution, while plant usually shows stretched exponential distribution. In the growth model, the plant and the pollinator are selected with probability Pp and PA=1-Pp, respectively. The number of incoming links for the plant and the pollinator is lp and lA, respectively. The probability that the link of the plant selects the pollinator of the existing network given as $A_{k_i}=k^{{\lambda}_A}_i/{\sum}_i\;k^{{\lambda}_A}_i$, and the probability that the pollinator selects the plant is $P_{k_i}=k^{{\lambda}_p}_i/{\sum}_i\;k^{{\lambda}_p}_i$. When the nonlinear growth index is 𝛌X=1 (X=A or P), the degree distribution follows a power law, and if 0≤𝛌X<1, the degree distribution follows a stretched exponential distribution. The cumulative degree distributions of plants and pollinators of 14 empirical plant-pollinators included in Interaction Web Database were calculated. A set of parameters (PA,PP,lA,lP) that reproduces these cumulative degree distributions and a growth index 𝛌X (X=A or P) were obtained. We found that animal takes very heterogenous connections, whereas plant takes a more flexible connection network.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Grant No. NRF-2020R1A2C1005334).

References

  1. Arroyo, M.T.K., Primack, R., and Armesto, J. (1982). Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile. I. pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. American Journal of Botany, 69, 82-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2442833
  2. Barabasi, A.L., and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (New York, N.Y.), 286, 509-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  3. Barrett, S.C.H., and Helenurm, K. (1987). The reproductive biology of boreal forest herbs. I. Breeding systems and pollination. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65, 2036-2046. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-278
  4. Bascompte, J. (2009). Mutualistic networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1890/080026
  5. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melian, C.J., and Olesen, J.M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 9383-9387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633576100
  6. Boucher, D.H. (1985). The Biology of Mutualism: Ecology and Evolution. London: Oxford University Press.
  7. Clements, F.E., and Long, F.L. (1923). Experimental Pollination an Outline of the Ecology of Flowers and Insects. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
  8. Cohen, J.E. (2020). Species-abundance distributions and Taylor's power law of fluctuation scaling. Theoretical Ecology, 13, 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-020-00470-x
  9. de Lima Filho, J.A., Vieira, R.J.A.G., de Souza, C.A.M., Ferreira, F.F., and de Oliveira, V.M. (2021). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity patterns of ecosystems with resource competition. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 564, 125497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125497
  10. Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J., and Martinez, N.D. (2002). Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 12917-12922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192407699
  11. Elberling, H., and Olesen, J.M. (1999). The structure of a high latitude plant-flower visitor system: the dominance of flies. Ecography, 22, 314-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00507.x
  12. Hocking, B. (1968). Insect-flower associations in the high arctic with special reference to nectar. Oikos, 19, 359-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565022
  13. Hwang, J.K., Lee, K.E., Maeng, S.E., and Lee, J.W. (2008). Scaling behaviors of plant-pollinator mutualistic networks. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 53, 3151-3155. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.53.3151
  14. Inouye, D.W., and Pyke, G.H. (1988). Pollination biology in the Snowy Mountains of Australia: comparisons with montane Colorado, USA. Australian Journal of Ecology, 13, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1988.tb00968.x
  15. Kato, M., Kakutani, T., Inoue, T., and Itino, T. (1990). Insect-flower relationship in the primary beech forest of Ashu, Kyoto: an overview of the flowering phenology and the seasonal pattern of insect visits. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University, 27, 309-376.
  16. Kevan, P.G. (1970). High arctic insect-flower visitor relations: the inter-relationships of arthropods and flowers at Lake Hazen, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton.
  17. Krapivsky, P.L., and Redner, S. (2001). Organization of growing random networks. Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear and Soft Matter Physics, 63(6 Pt 2), 066123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.066123
  18. Lee, D.S., Maeng, S.E., and Lee, J.W. (2012). Scaling of nested-ness in complex networks. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 60, 648-656. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.648
  19. Luz, F.A., Goetz, A.P.M., and Mendonca, M.d.S. (2021). What drives gallers and parasitoids interacting on a host plant? A network approach revealing morphological coupling as the main factor. Ecological Entomology, 46, 334-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12967
  20. Maeng, S.E., and Lee, J.W. (2011). Asymmetric network properties of bipartite ecological networks. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 58, 851-854. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.58.851
  21. Maeng, S.E., Lee, J.W., and Lee, D.S. (2012). Interspecific competition underlying mutualistic networks. Physical Review Letters, 108, 108701. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.108701
  22. Maeng, S.E., Lee, J.W., and Lee, D.S. (2013). Impact of compatibility on the organization of mutualistic networks. Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear and Soft Matter Physics, 88, 022804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.022804
  23. Maeng, S.E., Lee, J.W., and Lee, D.S. (2019). Competition-induced increase of species abundance in mutualistic networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2019, 033502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab0549
  24. McLeod, A.M., and Leroux, S.J. (2021). Incongruent drivers of network, species and interaction persistence in food webs. Oikos, 130, 1726-1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08512
  25. McMullen, C.K. (1993). Flower-visiting insects of the Galapagos Islands. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 69, 95-106.
  26. Medan, D., Montaldo, N.H., Devoto, M., Maniese, A., Vasellati, V., Roitman, G.G., et al. (2002). Plant-pollinator relationships at two altitudes in the Andes of Mendoza, Argentina. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, 34, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1552480
  27. Memmott, J. (1999). The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. Ecology Letters, 2, 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00087.x
  28. Montoya, J.M., Pimm, S.L., and Sole, R.V. (2006). Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature, 442, 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04927
  29. Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y.L., and Jordano, P. (2007). The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19891-19896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104
  30. Ramirez, N., and Brito, Y. (1992). Pollination biology in a palm swamp community in the Venezuelan Central Plains. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 110, 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1992.tb00294.x
  31. Robertson, C. (1928). Flowers and Insects: Lists of Visitors of Four Hundred and Fifty-Three Flowers. Carlinville: Science Press Printing Company.
  32. Strydom, T., Catchen, M.D., Banville, F., Caron, D., Dansereau, G., Desjardins-Proulx, P., et al. (2021). A roadmap towards predicting species interaction networks (across space and time). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 376, 20210063. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0063