DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Delimitation of Jurisdiction of Commercial, Civil and Administrative Courts: IT Challenges

  • Received : 2022.07.05
  • Published : 2022.07.30

Abstract

In modern conditions of the development of public relations, there is a continuous development of technologies. This not only reflects the convenience of service users, and new technology but also contributes to the emergence of new disputes to protect the rights of stakeholders. Therefore, it is urgent to study the distinctions between the jurisdiction of commercial, civil and administrative courts in resolving IT disputes. The work aims to study the peculiarities of delimitation of the jurisdiction of commercial, civil, and administrative courts through the prism of IT measurement. The research methodology consists of such methods as a historical, comparative-legal, formal-logical, empirical, method of analogy, method of synthesis, method of analysis, and systematic method. Examining the specifics of delimiting the jurisdiction of commercial, civil, and administrative courts through the IT dimension, it was concluded that there is a problem in determining the jurisdiction of the court. In addition, the judicial practice on this issue is quite variable, which negatively affects the predictability of technology in resolving potential disputes. In this regard, the criterion models for distinguishing between commercial, administrative, and civil proceedings according to the legal classification of the parties, as well as the nature of the claim are identified. This separation will contribute to a more accurate application of legal norms and methods of application of administrative norms and reduce the number of cases of improper proceedings.

Keywords

References

  1. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (as amended by the Protocols of 11 May 1994 № 11, 13 May 2004 № 14, 2 October 2013 No. 16), ratified by Law of 17 July 1997 № 475/97-VR. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 1998. № 13. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 (1994)
  2. Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine of November 6, 1991 981798-XII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text
  3. Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine dated 06.07.2005 №2747-IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text
  4. Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine of March 18, 2004 № 1618-IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text (2004)
  5. Bakonina O.: Determining the jurisdiction of cases: whether the only practice of the courts. Yurliga's website. https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/195495_viznachennyapdsudnost-sprav-chi-dina-praktika-sudv(2020)
  6. Verbitska, M.: Theoretical and methodological justification of the essence of corporate dispute and the peculiarities of its subject jurisdiction. Vip. 2. pp. 111-116. http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/handle/316497/35327(2019)
  7. Gorban O.: Jurisdiction of courts in considering Internet disputes. Vip. 36. Legal newspaper website. https://yurgazeta.com/publications/practice/sudovapraktika/yurisdikciya-sudiv-pri-rozglyadiinternetsporiv.html(2016)
  8. Dyachenko, S.V., Gontsovska, L.V.: Delimitation of court jurisdictions in resolving disputes arising from the emphyteusis agreement: case law. Prykarpattya Legal Bulletin. Vip. 1 (36). C. 21-26. http://pyuv.onua.edu.ua/index.php/pyuv/article/view/725/1061(2021)
  9. Zaitseva A.: Problems of determining the jurisdiction of courts in the field of protection of intellectual property rights to marks for goods and services. Theory and practice of intellectual property. Vip. 3. C.28-35. http://www.ndiiv.org.ua/Files2/2015_3/6.pdf(2015)
  10. Kovaliv, M.V., Gavriltsiv, M.T., Starukha, I.B.: Administrative Justice. Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. 596 s. http://dcmaup.com.ua/assets/files/administrativne-sudochinstvo.pdf(2014)
  11. Kucheryavenko, M.: Reforming jurisdictions: "pro" or "contra"? Site lexinform. https://lexinform.com.ua/dumka-eksperta/reformuvannya-yurysdyktsij-pro-chy-contra/(2020)
  12. Mamai, V.A.: Problems of determining the jurisdiction of the court when considering a labor dispute: an analysis of case law. State and regions. Vip. 2 (68). C. 59-63. http://www.law.stateandregions.zp.ua/archive/2_2020/12.pdf(2020)
  13. Mysnyk, M.: The practice of dispute resolution in the IT field. Lawyer & Law. Vip. 19. https://www.asterslaw.com/ua/press_center/publications/dispute_resolution_in_it_industry_in_ukraine/(2021)
  14. Mudrytska, K.O.: Features of resolving disputes over infringement of intellectual property rights on Internet sites. National University "Odesa Law Academy". Odesa. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/15754(2021)
  15. Romashchenko, D., Tomarov, I.: Top 5 litigation in the field of technology. Website "Vasyl Kisil and Partners". https://vkp.ua/publication/top5_sudovikh_sporiv_u_sferi_tekhnologiy(2018)
  16. Sidorenko, K.: The legislator has established rules for dispute resolution, but the Supreme Court has to clarify them. Law and Business website. https://zib.com.ua/ua/137995.html(2019)
  17. Starodub, I.: The practice of resolving IT disputes. Website Legal.hub.online. https://legalhub.online/blogy/praktyka-vyrishenni-it-sporiv(2021)
  18. Hodosh, A.V.: Domain disputes arising from trademark infringement: possible solutions. Legal scientific electronic journal. Vip. 10. C. 182-186. http://www.lsej.org.ua/10_2021/47.pdf(2021)
  19. Shumilo M.: Jurisdiction of labor disputes and its impact on the theory of labor law. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. C. 70-75. http://visnyk.law.knu.ua/images/articles/14.--114.pdf(2020)
  20. Internet Trends 2022. Stats & Facts in the U.S. and Worldwide. https://www.vpnmentor.com/blog/vital-internet-trends/ (2022)
  21. Pavlova, M.: Delimitation and Correlation of Civil and Administrative Legal Proceedings: Qualification Problems and Criteria. Local Law. Vol 18. No 2. http://pub.lex-localis.info/index.php/LexLocalis/article/view/1293(2020)