DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Updated Evidence-based Practice Review on Teaching Mathematics to Students with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Alhwaiti, Mohammed M. (Faculty of Education, Umm Al-Qura University)
  • Received : 2022.05.05
  • Published : 2022.05.30

Abstract

Educational programs for students with intellectual disabilities have undergone drastic changes in pursuit of the general curriculum. Accordingly, teachers in various fields, including mathematics, strive to find effective methods that enhance learning. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the field of teaching mathematics to students with intellectual disabilities to investigate relevant effective teaching strategies and required teaching skills. To achieve this goal, studies published during the period 2018-2021 were reviewed. Findings indicate the inclusion of nine studies that met the inclusion criteria out of 55 studies. The included studies found that the system of least prompts (SLP) in conjunction with feedback and error correction, and schema-based instruction are generally the most effective strategies in teaching mathematical skills to students with intellectual disabilities. Addition is the most targeted skill, followed by subtraction and algebra problem solving. The least targeted skills are multiplication, recognition of geometric shapes, calculating price after discount, rapid recognition of numbers, and rapid problem solving. The paper provides recommendations and suggests venues of future research.

Keywords

References

  1. Abedi, A. (2010). The effect of neurological interventions on improving the educational performance of children with mental disability in math. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4):13-24
  2. Baroody, A. J., Li, X., & Lai, M. L. (2008). Toddlers' spontaneous attention to number. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(3), 240-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802216151
  3. Bouck, E. C., & Long, H. (2020). Teaching students with intellectual and developmental disabilities to calculate cost after discounts via schematic diagrams. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 102(4), 112-131. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103656 .
  4. Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2018). Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 237-248 https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755696
  5. Bowman, J. A., McDonnell, J., Ryan, J. H., & Fudge-Coleman, O. (2019). Effective mathematics instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619827932
  6. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74,(3), 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401.
  7. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Lo, Y., Saunders, A. F., Root, J. R., Ley Davis, L., & Brosh, C. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222-235 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
  8. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Lee, K., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to-moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39, 20-31 https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2001)039<0020:tmtswm>2.0.co;2
  9. Chapman, S. M., Ault, M. J., Spriggs, A. D., Bottge, B. A., & Shepley, S. B. (2019). Teaching algebra with a functional application to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(2), 161-174.
  10. Ehsan, H., Rispoli, M., Lory, C., & Gregori, E. (2018). A systematic review of steminstruction with students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,13(3) 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0142-8.
  11. Gast, D. L., Lloyd,B. P., Jennifer R. Ledford, J. R. (2018). Single case research methodology. Taylor & Francis Group.
  12. Geary, D. C. (2014). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201
  13. Hord, C. & Xin, Y.P. (2015). Teaching area and volume to students with mild intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 49(2) 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914527826
  14. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
  15. Hudson, M. E., Rivera, C. J., & Grady, M. M. (2018). Research on mathematics instruction with students with significant cognitive disabilities: Has anything changed? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918756601
  16. Jimenez, B., & Saunders, A. (2019). Increasing efficiency in mathematics: Teaching subitizing to students with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 31(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9624-y
  17. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental psychology, 45(3), 850-862 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
  18. Karabulut, A., & Ozmen, E. R. (2018). Effect of "Understand and solve!" strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of students with mild intellectual disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 77-90 https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018245314
  19. Kearns, J. F., Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H. L., Kleinert, J. O., & Kleine-Kracht Thomas, M. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. The Journal of Special Education, 45, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909344223.
  20. King, S. A., Lemons, C. J., & Davidson, K. A. (2016). Math interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder: A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82, 443-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625066.
  21. Kumatongo, B.(2019). Study on learning of Mathematical concepts by learners with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research,5(1)- 4-43.
  22. McKenzie, K., Milton, M., Smith, G., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2016). Systematic review of the prevalence and incidence of intellectual disabilities: Current trends and issues. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 3(2), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7
  23. McKenzie, J. A., Jelsma, J. M., Pillay, S. G., Duvenhage, C.-M., & Du Plessis, E. (2017). Implementation of educational provision for children with severe to profound intellectual disability in the western cape: From rights to reality. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(6), 596-611. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/1034912X.2017.1313394
  24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. Plos Med, 6(7), 264-269 .
  25. Orihuela, S. M., Collins, B. C., Spriggs, A. D., & Kleinert, H. (2019). An instructional package for teaching geometric shapes to elementary students with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-09314-5
  26. Ozsoy, G., Kuruyer, H. G., & Cakiroglu, A. (2015). Evaluation of students' mathematical problem solving skills in relation to their reading levels. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 581- 600.
  27. Park, J., Bouck, E. C., & Josol, C. K. (2020). Maintenance in mathematics for individuals with intellectual disability: A systematic review of literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 105, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103751
  28. Purpura, D. J., Hume, L. E., Sims, D. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2011). Early literacy and early numeracy: The value of including early literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004
  29. Root, J. R., & Browder, D. M. (2019). Algebraic problem solving for middle school students with autism and intellectual disability. Exceptionality, 27(2), 118-132. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1394304
  30. Root, J. R., Cox, S. K., & Gonzalez, S. (2019). Using modified schema-based instruction with technology-based supports to teach data analysis. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 53-68. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1540796919833915
  31. Saunders, A. F., Spooner, F., & Ley Davis, L. (2018). Using video prompting to teach mathematical problem solving of real-world video-simulation problems. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517717042
  32. Spooner, F., Root, J. R., Saunders, A. F., & Browder, D. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150-165 https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751055
  33. Vashist, M., Yadav, R., & Sharma, S. (2013). Study of prevalence, sex ratio and different level of intellectual disability in Haryana. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 4(2), 211-214. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.5958/j.0976-5506.4.2.045