Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas (한국가스학회지)

The Korean Institute of GAS (한국가스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Management Method for Preventing Workers' unsafe Behavior in Chemical Plant

화학공장의 근로자 불안전상태 예방을 위한 관리방법에 관한 연구

  • Baek, Ju Hong (Dept. of chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Lim, Dong-Hui (Dept. of chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Seop (Dept. of chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Seol, Ji Woo (Dept. of chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Yoo, Byung Tae (Dept. of Safety Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Ko, Jae Wook (Dept. of chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
  • 백주홍 (광운대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 임동휘 (광운대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 김민섭 (광운대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 설지우 (광운대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 유병태 (한국교통대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • 고재욱 (광운대학교 화학공학과)
  • Received : 2022.04.11
  • Accepted : 2022.04.28
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The causes of accidents occurring in chemical plants vary, but 96% of industrial accidents occurring worldwide are caused by workers' unsafe behavior. The International Labour Organization (ILO) has announced 20 elements of workers' anxiety-warning behaviors that occur on multiple occasions at industrial sites in order to warn them of the risk of accidents caused by workers' anxiety-driven behavior, and to prevent industrial accidents, workers' anxiety-driven behavior should be controlled under stress In this study, major types of unsafe behavior were analyzed on the basis of information on the accident investigation history of domestic workspaces in order to find out how workers can manage their unsafe behavior. Based on the results of the analysis of the major anxiety war behavior, the root cause of causing anxiety war behavior was analyzed using the Swiss Cheese Model, and each root cause management method was proposed.

화학공장에서 발생하는 사고의 발생원인은 다양하지만, 전 세계적으로 발생되는 산업재해의 96%는 근로자의 불안전행동에 의해 발생된다. 국제노동기구(International Labour Organization, ILO)에서는 근로자의 불안전행동에 의한 사고의 위험성을 경고하기 위하여 산업현장에서 다발적으로 발생하는 근로자의 불안전 행동을 20개의 요소로 구분하여 발표한 바 있으며, 산업재해 예방을 위해서는 근로자의 불안전행동을 제어하여야 한다고 강조하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 근로자의 불안전행동을 관리할 수 있는 방법을 알아보기 위하여 국내사업장의 사고조사 이력 정보를 토대로 현장에서 다발적으로 발생하는 주요 불안전행동 유형을 분석 하였다. 주요 불안전행동 분석 결과를 기반으로 Swiss Cheese Model을 이용하여 불안전 행동을 유발하는 근본원인을 분석하였으며, 각 근본원인별 관리방법을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부 / 국토교통과학기술 진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었음. (과제번호 21ATOG-C162087-01).

References

  1. Dupont, Annual Safety Culture Report-The values-based safety process, (2011)
  2. ILO, The Unsafe acts and the decision-to-err factors, (2005)
  3. Heinrich. H. W., Peterson, D. Roos, N. Industrial Accident Prevention, (1980)
  4. Anemones. S., Safety Culture Assessment : A Mission Impossible?, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, (2009)
  5. Bandura, A., Socialfoundations of Thoughtand Action. Englewood Cliffs, Nj:Prentics-Hal., (1986)
  6. Guldenmund. F. W., Understanding and exploring safety culture. Delft University, (2010)
  7. Barndoor, A., Social foundations of Thoughted action, Englewood Cliffs, Nj;Perntics-Hal., (1986)
  8. Dow Chemical, Responsible Care Campaign, Annual Report US, (2008)
  9. Hyuck-myun Kwon, "The effectiveness of process safety management(PSM) regulation for chemical industry in Korea", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(1), 13~16, (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.009
  10. "Layer of Protection Analysis", Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, (2001)
  11. Crowl, D. A., J. F. Louvar, "Chemical Process Safety : Fundamentals with Applications", Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, (2002)
  12. "Workplace Safety and Health Guidelines : Process Safety Performance Indicators", WSH Council & the Ministry of Manpower in Singapore, (2012)
  13. J.Roberto Gonzalea, R.M. Drabra, Josep Arnaldos, "Using Fuzzy Logic to Introduce the Human Factor in the Failure Frequency Estimation of Storage Vessesl in Chemical Plants", Chemical Engineering Transactionsl, 32, 193-198, (2013)
  14. Rafiq M. Choudhry, Dongping Fang, "Why operatives engage in unsafe work behaviour:Investigating factors on constructions site", safety science, 46(4), 566-584, (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
  15. Behoush Darabnia, Micaela Demichela, "Analysis and classification of Occupational Data: a Practical Comparison", Chemical Engineering Transactionsl, 43, 1267-1271, (2015)
  16. Baysari M.T., McIntosh A.S., Wilson J.R., "Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia". Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(5), 1750-1757, (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.013
  17. "Process Safety – Recommended Practice on key Performance Indicators", International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, Report No. 456, (2011)
  18. Petersen, D., "Human Error – Reduction and Safety Management". STPM Press, New York, (1982)
  19. Reason, J.T., "Human Error. Cambridge University Press", New York, (1990)
  20. Brown, I.D., "Accident reporting and analysis. In: Wilson, J.R., Corlett, E.N. (Eds.)", Evaluation of Human Work. Taylor & Francis, London. (1995)
  21. Mark Tweeddale, "Managing risk and Reliability of process plant", Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, (2003)
  22. Chuanjing Ju, Steve Rowlinson, Yan Ning, "Contractors' strategic responses to voluntary OHS programmes : An institutional perspective", safety science, 105, 22-31, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.011
  23. Donald A. Shafer, "Hazardous materials characterization: Evaluation method, procedures, and considerations", Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, (2006)
  24. DNVGL, "Improving Refinery Safety using Quantitative Risk Assessment and the Role of Software", www.dnvgl.com/Images/Improving Refinery Safety using Quantitative Risk Assessment and the role of software Cavanagh 2001 tcm8-12453. pdf
  25. Health and Safety Excutive, "Reducing risk protecting people HSE's decision-making process", Norwich, (2001)
  26. Clarke, Sharon, "Process Safety Culture:underspecified and overrated". International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 65-90, (2000) https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00031
  27. Carrillo, R.A.S., Expanding Managers' leadership role in safety. ProfessionalSafety, 43(6), 38-41, (1998)
  28. 이종은, "화학공장의 안전문화 향상을 위한 실증적 연구", 명지대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문, (2013)
  29. Kang,M.J., Lee,Y.S., Kwon.H.M., "A Study on the Development of Safety Performance Index in Chemical Industry", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 23(6), 57~61, (2008)
  30. 박계형, "안전문화에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 관한 연구", 서울과학기술대학교 산업대학원 석사학위논문, (2011)
  31. 이경훈, "사업장 관리자의 안전리더십이 작업장 안전문화에 미치는 영향 연구", 서울과학기술대학교 산업안전공학과 박사학위 논문, (2012)
  32. 하정호, "국내 안전보건시스템 도입실태 및 개선에 관한 연구", 명지대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, (2004)
  33. "안전문화 규제감독 기반 구축 및 시스템 개발보고서", 한국원자력안전기술원, (2015)
  34. 안전보건공단, KOSHA Guide(G-83-2016), "산업재해 기록.분류에 관한 지침", (2016)
  35. Health and Safety Executive, The role of managerial leadership in determining workplace safety outcomes, (2005)
  36. Julian.B., E.Kevin.K., Catherine.L, "Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 488-496, (2002) https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
  37. IAEA, Safety Culture. Safety Series No.75-INSAG-4), IAEA, Vienna., (1991)
  38. ACSNI, Human Factors Study Group. 3rd Report: Organising for Safety, Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Health and Safety Commission, (1993)
  39. Hannaford, E., "Supervisors Guide to Human Relations". National Safety Council Chicago. (1976)
  40. IAEA.Summary report on the post-accident review meeting on the Chernobyl accident (Safety Series75-INSAG-4).Vienna : InternationalSafety Advisory Group, (1986)