Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제83권1호
  • /
  • Pages.93-108
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adaptive compensation method for real-time hybrid simulation of train-bridge coupling system

  • Zhou, Hui M. (Engineering Seismic Research Center of Guangzhou University) ;
  • Zhang, Bo (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration) ;
  • Shao, Xiao Y. (Western Michigan University) ;
  • Tian, Ying P. (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration) ;
  • Guo, Wei (Central South University) ;
  • Gu, Quan (Xiamen University) ;
  • Wang, Tao (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.04
  • 심사 : 2022.04.28
  • 발행 : 2022.07.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) was applied to investigate the train-bridge interaction of a high-speed railway system, where the railway bridge was selected as the numerical substructure, and the train was physically tested. The interaction between the two substructures was reproduced by a servo-hydraulic shaking table. To accurately reproduce the high-frequency interaction responses ranging from 10-25Hz using the hydraulic shaking table with an inherent delay of 6-50ms, an adaptive time series (ATS) compensation algorithm combined with the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) was proposed and implemented in the RTHS. Testing cases considering different train speeds, track irregularities, bridge girder cross-sections, and track settlements featuring a wide range of frequency contents were conducted. The performance of the proposed ATS+LQG delay compensation method was compared to the ATS method and RTHS without any compensation in terms of residual time delays and root mean square errors between commands and responses. The effectiveness of the ATS+LQG method to compensate time delay in RTHS with high-frequency responses was demonstrated and the proposed ATS+LQG method outperformed the ATS method in yielding more accurate responses with less residual time delays.

키워드

과제정보

The authors are grateful to Cheng Zeng and Yang Wang of Central South University and Jiliang Wu and Yuan Bin of Xiamen University for their help with the test. The authors are also grateful to Weixu Song and Qinming Feng of BBK Test Systems Co. Ltd for their work with the pulsar control system. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878630, 51678538), the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Fund for Fine Youth Scholars (YQ2020E004), the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (JC2018018), Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

참고문헌

  1. Alejandro, P. and Mariantonieta, G.S. (2019), "Adaptive tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation of structures subjected to seismic loading", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 134(12), 106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106345.
  2. Chae, Y., Kazemibidokhti, K. and Ricles, J.M. (2013), "Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo-hydraulic actuator systems for real-time hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(11), 1697-1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2294.
  3. Chae, Y., Rabiee, R., Dursun, A. and Kim, C.Y. (2018), "Real-time force control for servo-hydraulic actuator systems using adaptive time series compensator and compliance springs", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47, 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2994.
  4. Chen, C., Ricles, J.M. and Guo, T. (2012), "Improved adaptive inverse compensation technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation", J. Eng. Mech., 138(12), 1432-1446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000450.
  5. Fedorova, M. and Sivaselvan, M. (2017), "An algorithm for dynamic vehicle-track-structure interaction analysis for high-speed trains", Eng. Struct., 148, 857-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.065.
  6. Fermandois-Cornejo, G. and Spencer, B.F. (2017), "Model-based framework for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation testing", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 16(4), 671-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0407-8.
  7. Gao, X., Castaneda, N.E. and Dyke, S.J. (2013), "Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(6), 815-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2246.
  8. Guo, W., Gao, X., Hu, P., Hu, Y., Bu, D. and Jiang, L. (2020), "Seismic damage features of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under near-fault earthquake", Adv. Struct. Eng., 23, 1573-1586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219896166.
  9. Guo, W., Wang, Y., Zeng, C., Wang, T., Gu, Q., Zhou, H., Zhou, L. and Hou, W. (2022), "Moving safety evaluation of high-speed train on post-earthquake bridge utilizing real-time hybrid simulation", J. Earthq. Eng., 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1999869.
  10. Guo, W., Zeng, C., Gou, H., Gu, Q., Wang, T., Zhou, H., Zhang, B. and Wu, J. (2021), "Real-time hybrid simulation of high-speed train-track-bridge interactions using the moving load convolution integral method", Eng. Struct., 228, 111537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111537.
  11. Guo, W., Zeng, C., Gou, H., Hu, Y., Xu, H. and Guo, L. (2019), "Rotational friction damper's performance for controlling seismic response of high speed railway bridge-track system", Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 120, 491-515. https://doi.org/10.32604/2019.06162.
  12. Hayati, S. and Song, W. (2017), "An optimal discrete-time feedforward compensator for real-time hybrid simulation", Smart Struct. Syst., 20(4), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.4.483.
  13. Horiuchi, T., Inoue, M., Konno, T. and Namita, Y. (1999), "Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 1121-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::AID-EQE858>3.0.
  14. Iwnicki, S. (2006), Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  15. Kobayashi, S., Stoten, D.P., Yamashita, Y. and Usuda, T. (2019), "Dynamically substructured testing of railway pantograph/catenary systems", Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Trans., 233, 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718799900.
  16. Kobayashi, S., Yamashita, Y. and Usuda, T. and Stoten, D.P. (2020), "Hybrid simulation testing of a pantograph-catenary system using a dynamically substructured system framework and a MDOF catenary model", Quart. Report of RTRI, 61(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.61.2_127.
  17. Luo, P. and Zeng, Q. (2005), "Formulation of equations of motion of finite element form for vehicle-track-bridge interaction system with two types of vehicle model", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 62, 435-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1207.
  18. Mathworks (2003), Simulink and xPC Target.
  19. Nakashima, M., Kato, H. and Takaoka, E. (1992), "Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 779-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210106.
  20. National Railway Administration of People's Republic of China (2014), PSD of Ballastless Track Irregularities of High Speed Railway, China Railway Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
  21. Ou, G., Ozdagli, A.I., Dyke, S.J. and Wu, B. (2015), "Robust integrated actuator control: Experimental verification and real-time hybrid-simulation implementation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(3), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2479.
  22. Philips, B.M. and Spencer, B.F. (2011), "Model-based feedforward-feedback tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation", NSEL Report Series, Report No. 028, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana.
  23. Sarebanha, A., Schellenberg, A.H., Schoettler, M.J., Mosqueda, G. and Mahin, S.A. (2019), "Real-time hybrid simulation of seismically isolated structures with full-scale bearings and large computational models", Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 120(3), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2019.04846.
  24. Schellenberg, A.H., Mahin, S.A. and Fenves, G.L. (2009), "Advanced implementation of hybrid simulation", Tech. Rep. 2009/104, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  25. Servotest systems Inc. (2020), https://www.servotestsystems.com/images/PDFs/ST_brochures/Servotest_Pulsar_concept_brochure.pdf.
  26. Silva, C.E., Gomez, D., Maghareh, A., Dyke, S.J. and Spencer, Jr. B.F. (2020), "Benchmark control problem for real-time hybrid simulation", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 135(1), 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106381.
  27. Stoten, D.P., Yamaguchi, T. and Yamashita, Y. (2016), "Dynamically substructured system testing for railway vehicle pantographs", J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 744(1), 012204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/744/1/012204.
  28. The MathWorks Inc. (2014), MATLAB, Version 8.3 Natick, Massachusetts.
  29. The MathWorks Inc. (2014), Simulink and xPC Target Natick, Massachusetts.
  30. Tian, Y., Zhou, H. and Wang, T. (2020), "Reproduction of the wind and earthquake coupled effect on a wind turbine tower in a shaking-table substructure test", Int. J. Lifecyc. Perform. Eng., 4(1-3), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLCPE.2020.10031039.
  31. Wagg, D.J. and Stoten, D.P. (2001), "Substructuring of dynamical systems via the adaptive minimal control synthesis algorithm", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(6), 865-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.44.
  32. Wallace, M.I., Wagg, D.J. and Neild, S.A. (2005), "An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring", Proc. R. Soc. A, 461(2064), 3807-3826. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2005.1532.
  33. Wang, Z., Xu, G., Li, Q. and Wu, B. (2020), "An adaptive delay compensation based on a discrete system model for real-time hybrid simulation", Smart Struct. Syst., 25(5), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.5.569.
  34. Watanabe, N. and Sasaki, K. (2012), "Fundamental tests on a rapid prototype bogie", Quart. Report RTRI, 53(4), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.53.199.
  35. Watanabe, N. and Stoten, D.P. (2016), "Actuator control for a rapid prototyping railway bogie, using a dynamically substructured systems approach", Quart. Report RTRI (Railw. Techn. Res. Inst.), 57, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.57.2_90.
  36. Williams, D.M., Williams, M.S. and Blakeborough, A. (2001), "Numerical modelling of a servo-hydraulic testing system for structures", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 127(8), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:8(816).
  37. Wu, B., Wang, Z. and Bursi, O.S. (2013), "Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real-time hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng Struct. Dyn., 42(12), 1749-1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2296.
  38. Zhou, H., Wagg, D.J. and Li, M. (2017), "Equivalent force control combined with adaptive polynomial-based forward prediction for real-time hybrid simulation", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 24(11), e2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2018.
  39. Zhou, H., Xu, D., Shao, X., Ning, X. and Wang, T. (2019), "A robust linear-quadratic-gaussian controller for the real-time hybrid simulation on a benchmark problem", Mech. Eng. Signal Pr., 133(1), 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106260.