Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

  • 제47권2호
  • /
  • Pages.93-98
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2508-1888(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-2461(eISSN)
대한방사선방어학회 (The Korean Association for Radiation Protection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Derivation of External Exposure Characteristics of Industrial Radiography Based on Empirical Evidence

  • Cho, Junik (Department of Nuclear Engineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Euidam (Department of Nuclear Engineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Eun (National Radiation Emergency Center, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Chung, Yoonsun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.20
  • 심사 : 2021.12.31
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: This study aims to derive the characteristics of each work type for industrial radiography based on empirical evidence through expert advice and a survey of radiation workers of various types of industrial radiography. Materials and Methods: According to a Korean report, work types of industrial radiography are classified into indoor tests, underground pipe tests, tests in a shielded room (radiographic testing [RT] room test), outdoor field tests, and outdoor large structure tests. For each work type, exposure geometry and radiation sources were mainly identified through the expert advice and workers' survey as reliable empirical evidence. Results and Discussion: The expert advice and survey results were consistent as the proportion of the work types were high in the order of RT room test, outdoor large structure test, underground pipe test, outdoor field test, and indoor test. The outdoor large structure test is the highest exposure risk work type in the industrial radiography. In most types of industrial radiography, radiation workers generally used 192Ir as the main source. In the results of the survey, the portion of sources was high in the order of 192Ir, X-ray generator, 60Co, and 75Se. As the exposure geometry, the antero-posterior geometry is dominant, and the rotational and isotropic geometry should be also considered with the work type. Conclusion: In this study, through expert advice and a survey, the external exposure characteristics for each work type of industrial radiography workers were derived. This information will be used in the reconstruction of organ dose for health effects assessment of Korean radiation workers.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), funded by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No. 50091-2021).

참고문헌

  1. Ryu S. Status and prospect of NDT technology. J Korean Soc Mech Eng. 2016;56(4):37-40.
  2. Willcox M, Downes G. A brief description of NDT techniques. Herefordshire, UK: Insight Equipment Ltd.; 2003.
  3. Menaria T, Kumar M. Review on radiographic imaging modalities for non-destructive testing and evaluation (NDT & E). Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Computing in Science, Technology and Management (SUSCOM); 2019 Feb 26-28; Jaipur, India. 2019. p. 1298-1304.
  4. Currivan L, Duffy JT, Spain D, Pollard, D. A study of dose distribution and radiation protection in industrial radiography in Ireland. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association; 2004 May 23-28; Madrid, Spain. p. 24-28.
  5. Ju KT, Lee DS, Ju SH, Kim SY, Yu BJ. Studies and proposition for reducing the work radiation exposure in non-destructive testing industries. Ulsan, Korea: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute; 2012.
  6. Korea Industrial Testing Co. Ltd. Evaluation of exposure radiation by work of non-destructive testing workers (No. KINS/HR-977). Daejeon, Korea: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2009.
  7. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. 2018 Report in occupational radiation exposure in Korea (No KoFONS/RR-006). Seongnam, Korea: Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety; 2020.
  8. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission. 2020 Nuclear safety yearbook. Seoul, Korea; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; 2021.
  9. Kwon TE, Jeong A, Kim E, Cho J, Chung Y, Lee DN, et al. Organ dose reconstruction for Korean radiation workers study. Proceedings of the Spring Conference of the Korean Association for Radiation Protection; 2021 Apr 30; Gangneung, Korea. p. 110-112.
  10. Laurier D, Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, Gillies M, O'Hagan J, et al. The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS): a collaborative epidemiological study to improve knowledge about health effects of protracted low-dose exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;173(1-3):21-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw314
  11. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, et al. The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167(4):396-416. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr0553.1
  12. Simon SL. Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel. Health Phys. 2011;101(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e318204a60a
  13. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Deriving Organ doses and their uncertainty for epidemiologic studies (with a focus on the one million US Workers and Veterans Study of low-dose radiation health effects) (No. 178). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2018.
  14. Cho J, Kim E, Kwon TE, Jeong A, Chung Y. Occupational external exposure scenario of non-destructive testing radiation worker in Korea. Proceedings of the Spring Conference of the Korean Association for Radiation Protection; 2021 Apr 30; Gangneung, Korea. p. 176-178.
  15. Park SK, Ahn YS, Gil DS. Application of computed radiography for nondestructive testing of boiler tube weldments. J Power Syst Eng. 2009;13(5):95-102.
  16. Lee Y. Method of radiographic testing and industrial application. J Weld Join. 1994;12(4):35-40.
  17. Cho YI, Shin SH, Kim JH. Dose assessment and shielding analysis of the working environments for non-destructive testing. J Instrum. 2020;15:P06012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/p06012
  18. Petoussi-Henss N, Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Endo A, Hertel N, Hunt J, et al. ICRP publication 116: conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Ann ICRP. 2010;40(2-5):1-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2011.10.001
  19. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. Regulations on technical standards for radiation safety control, etc. [Internet]. Daejeon, Korea: Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety; 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 1]. Available from: http://preview.kins.re.kr/v/p8nTzUJFQhV.
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency. Manual on gamma radiography. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1996.