Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Lesson Plans for Math Underachievers with Hypothetical Learning Trajectories and Universal Design for Learning

느리게 배우는 학습자를 위한 초등예비교사의 수학수업 설계

  • Received : 2022.05.26
  • Accepted : 2022.06.27
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was related to the cases in which pre-service elementary teachers designed math lessons tailored to math underachievers with learning trajectories and universal design for learning. Learning trajectories can be a basis to identify students' current state of understanding and development, and make a lesson plan responsively tailored to underachievers' state. And universal design for learning is a framework that removes potential barriers that may exist in math lessons from the time the lessons are planned, and guides the rich learning environment accessible to all learners. In order to provide an experience of designing math lessons considering the characteristics of math underachievers, this study required pre-service elementary teachers to create learning trajectories and make lesson plans with the principles of universal design for learning. The characteristics of the learning trajectories shown in the lesson plans and the results of applying the principles of universal design for learning were analyzed. By discussing the results, implications were derived regarding the necessity of lesson planning for math underachievers and the development of lesson planning competency of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers in teacher education.

본 연구는 가설학습경로와 보편적 학습설계(UDL)를 기반으로 초등예비교사가 느리게 배우는 학습자에게 맞춘 수학 수업을 설계한 사례를 활용한 연구이다. 가설학습경로는 계열성을 특징으로 하는 수학 교과에서 느리게 배우는 학습자에게 맞추어 도움을 제공해야 할 때 그들의 현재 이해 및 발달의 상태를 파악하고 그것에 반응적으로 수업을 설계할 때 의사결정의 근거로 삼을 수 있다. 또한, 보편적 학습설계는 수업을 설계할 때 수업에 존재할 수도 있는 잠재적 장벽을 제거하여 모든 학생이 접근할 수 있는 풍부한 학습 환경을 안내하는 프레임워크이다. 본 연구는 초등예비교사에게 느리게 배우는 학습자의 특성에 맞춘 수업을 설계하는 경험을 제공하여 가설학습경로를 생성하게 하고, 보편적 학습설계의 원리를 적용한 수업안을 작성하도록 하였다. 그리고 수업안에 나타난 가설학습경로의 특징 및 보편적 학습설계의 적용 결과를 분석하였다. 이러한 분석결과에 따른 논의를 통해 예비교사교육과정에서 느리게 배우는 학습자를 위한 수학수업 설계 경험의 필요성과 느리게 배우는 학습자를 위한 수업설계에서 가설학습경로 및 UDL의 적용 가능성에 관한 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2021S1A5B5A17057179)

References

  1. Kang, W., & Kang, T. S. (2003). An analysis of the order relation of fractions in elementary school mathematics textbooks. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 14(1), 35-64.
  2. Ministry of Education (2019a). Korean national elementary mathematics 3-1 teachers' guide. Visang Education.
  3. Ministry of Education (2019, March 29). Being responsible for basic education without missing a child. Retrieved from https://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=77172&lev=0&searchType=C&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  4. Ministry of Education (2020, May 26). A comprehensive plan for mathematics education that grows together and lead the future with thinking power. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=0204&opType=N&boardSeq=80718
  5. Ministry of Education (2020, October 5). Top 10 policy challenges for future education transition after COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=0204&opType=N&boardSeq=82145
  6. Ministry of Education (2021, November 24). Education for the better future and for all: 2022 revised curriculum overview key points. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  7. Kwon, H. J. (2012). The effects of science class applied universal design for learning on science achievement and academic engagement of students with and without disabilities and on teachers'-students' performance in a general middle school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
  8. Enforcement Decree of the Basic Education Guarantee Act (2022, March 25). Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr/법령/기초학력보장법시행령.
  9. Kucu (2021, May 10). http://www.basics.re.kr.
  10. Kim, N. J. (2019). Understanding of universal design for learning. YSW publishing.
  11. Kim, N. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2018). A study on the development of Korean UDL based instructional design model(K-PAL). The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 45-86. https://doi.org/10.19049/jsped.2018.19.3.03
  12. Kim, M. K. (2009). A study of the sixth graders' knowledge of concepts and operations about fraction. The Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 12(2), 151-170.
  13. Kim, B. R. (2016). Examine the features of evidence based instruction in elementary mathematics teacher's guidebook for student with math learning disabilities and students with underachievement: Only about number and operations. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(2), 353-370.
  14. Kim, B. R. (2019). The effects of the direct instruction on mathematics achievement of elementary 3rd grade normal-achieving students, underachieving students and students with math disabilities. The Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 23(3), 91-120. https://doi.org/10.34262/kadd.2019.23.3.120
  15. Kim, S. M. (2010). Composing principles of mathematics exercise books for low achievers in mathematics induced by an analysis of 'Suhak-ikhimchaek', Korean Elementary Mathematics Workbook. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 615-631.
  16. Kim, Y., & Hwang, H. (2016). An analysis of elementary school students' strategy in comparing the size of fractions. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(4), 663-682.
  17. Kim, E., Park, M. (2015). The effects of udl reading classes on inclusive elementary students: Academic achievement, class participation. The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(4), 33-60.
  18. Kim, J. H., & Oh, Y. (2010). An analysis of the effects of teaching mathematics underachievers by the principles of cognitively guided instruction. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 789-806.
  19. Kim, T. E., Kwon, S. K., Park, J., Lee, M., Jo, Y. D., & Lee, K. H. (2020). The process of elementary and middle school underachievers' growth in learning: a longitudinal case study (IV). KICE.
  20. Kim, T. E., Park, J., Lee, J., Kwon, S. K., & Ko, J. H. (2019). The process of elementary and middle school underachievers' growth in learning: a longitudinal case study (III). KICE.
  21. Kim, T. E., Yang, J. S., Noh, W. K., Lee, S. M., Oh, T. G., & Lee, H. J. (2019). A study on the establishment of the concept of basic academic ability in the age of the fourth industrial revolution. KICE.
  22. Kim, T. E., Oh, S., Park, T., Woo, Y. K., Kwon, S. K., Kim, Y., & Seo, D. (2017). Investigating the process of underachiever's growth in elementary and secondary school settings: a longitudinal case study. KICE.
  23. Kim, H. K. (2020). Meta analysis on the improvement of academic performance by the teaching method for underachievers of learning mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 59(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.1.31
  24. Kim, H. K., & Ko, H. K. (2018). A Case Study on Math Clinical Counseling based on Connection with Class. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2018.32.2.113
  25. Kim, H. J., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Cho, J. W., Cho, H. M., Choi, J. S., Han, C. L., Hwang, J. H., Kim, S. B., & Lee, G. H. (2020). A study on the development of evaluation items for the diagnosis of mathematical learning difficulties. KOFAC.
  26. Park, N. S. (2013). Principles and application method of UDL for participation of students with disabilities on social studies classes in inclusive class. Research in Social Studies Education, 20(2), 45-59.
  27. Park, J. G., & Oh, Y. (2013). A trend analysis on mathematics underachievers in the elementary school. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 17(2), 265-283.
  28. Pang, J. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2009). An analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in elementary mathematics instructional materials. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 13(2), 285-304.
  29. Son, S. H. (2008). Individualized Instruction for Underachieving Students. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 20(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2008.20.1.93
  30. Son, T. K., Ahn, D. Y., Yoo, S. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2021). An analysis of research trends of domestic mathematics struggling learners using topic modeling. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(1), 1-13.
  31. Ahn, J. S., & Kim, M. K. (2015). The effects of the fraction comprehension and mathematical attitude in fraction learning centered on various representation activities. Communications of Mathematical Education, 29(2), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2015.29.2.215
  32. Oh, S., Kim, T. E., Noh, W. K., Woo, Y. K., Lee, Y. T., Lee, J. J., Park, S. H., & Lee, D. W. (2017). A study on the one-to-one customized education plan to not miss one child. KICE.
  33. Yoo, H. (2018). Effects of evidence-based instruction applied to after-school tier 2 intervention on math achievement of students with math learning disabilities and students with math learning difficulties. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(3), 177-202.
  34. Yoo, H., & Kim, A. (2021). Effects of CSA strategic teaching utilizing visual model on academic accomplishments in multiplication of elementary school students who have low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(10), 399-415.
  35. Yoo, H., Cho, Y. M., Na, G. S., Ko, E. S., Ko, J. H., & Lee, D. H. (2019). Research and Teaching Guidance on Curricular Materials in Elementary mathematics education. Dong Myeong Publishers.
  36. Lee, A., Kim, S., Lee, D., Lee. H., & Shin, J. (2021). Development and implementation of online learning module based on UDL for elementary pre-service teachers. The Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.26592/KSIE.2021.16.2.131
  37. Lee, S. M., Kim, T. E., Kwon, S. K., Park, J. H., Lee, M., & Woo, Y. K. (2020). The classroom that we didn't know: What 44 students taught us. KICE.
  38. Lee, J. A., & Lee, S. H. (2019). The effects of universal design for learning in elementary social studies classes on interest of learning social studies, acceptance of students with disabilities, and social status of students in inclusive classrooms. The Journal of Elementary Education, 32(3), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.29096/jee.32.3.13
  39. Lee, J. Y. (2015). Development of fraction division learning trajectory based on quantitative reasoning with unit of elementary school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  40. Lee, J. M., Lee, S. M., & Nam, S. K. (2008). The factors that related to the academic underachievement of elementary school upper-level students in math education. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 5(3), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2008.5.3.305
  41. Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2020). Misunderstanding and understanding of universal design for learning. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.19049/jsped.2020.21.1.02
  42. Jo, Y., & Byun, Y. (2021). A qualitative study on the practice cases of classes applying universal design for learning: Focusing on elementary school math subjects. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(20), 325-346.
  43. Jo, Y., Byun, Y., Oh, J. G., & Lee, S. H. (2019). A study on the development of teaching practice framework and strategy of universal design for learning. GIE.
  44. Choi, S. H., Cho, S. M., & Ryu, H. A. (2012). : A study on development of personalized learning materials for underachievers in elementary mathematics. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 15(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEC.2012.15.2.135
  45. Ha, E. Y., & Chang, H. W. (2009). Case study on change in the geometrical thinking levels of the under achievers by using mathematical journal writing. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 147-164.
  46. Hyeon, J., Yoo, J. Y., & Jeon, S. Y. (2010). Universal design for learning with policy challenges and recommendations for all students. KEDI.
  47. Hong, S., Joung, Y., Ahn, Y. Lee, Y., Lee, D., Ahn, T., Choi, Y., Lee, M., & Moon, S. (2018). The development of a teacher training program for the enhancement of teacher competence in an intelligent information society: Focusing on classroom teaching skills. KICE.
  48. Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843-908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
  49. Barrett, J. E., Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Cullen, C., McCool, J., Witkowski-Rumsey, C., & Klanderman, D. (2012). Evaluating and improving a learning trajectory for linear measurement in elementary grades 2 and 3: A longitudinal study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.625075
  50. Behr, M., Post, T. R., & Wachsmuth, I. (1986). Estimation and children's concept of rational number size. In H. Schoen, & M. Zweng (Eds.), Estimation and mental computation: 1986 yearbook (pp. 103-111). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  51. Buchheister, K., Jackson, C., & Taylor, C. E. (2017). Maths games: A universal design approach to mathematical reasoning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 22(4), 7-12.
  52. Carnine, D., Jones, E. D., & Dixon, R. (1994). Mathematics: Educational tools for diverse learners. Schol Psychological Review, 23, 402-423.
  53. CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
  54. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
  55. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 461-555). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  56. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2021). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  57. Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., & Corley, A. K. (2014). Learning trajectories: A framework for connecting standards with curriculum. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 46(5), 719-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0598-7
  58. Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., Nguyen, K. H., Mojica, G., & Myers, M. (2009). Equipartitioning/splitting as a foundation of rational number reasoning using learning trajectories. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. & akonidis, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 345-352). Thessaloniki, Greece.
  59. Corcoran, Thomas B.; Mosher, Frederic A.; and Rogat, Aaron. (2009). Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform. CPRE Research Reports. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/53
  60. Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412446178
  61. Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646
  62. Daro, P., Mosher, F., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/learning%20trajectories%20in%20math_ccii%20report.pdf
  63. Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2019). Extending Children's Mathematics-Fractions and Decimals. 김진호, 여승현, 이대현, 성창근, 최창우, 박성선 역. 분수와 소수 지도를 위한 새로운 접근법: CGI. 교육과학사. (원저 출판 2011년)
  64. Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic Reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375
  65. Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). An introduction to universal design for learning: Questions and answers. In T. E. Hall, A. Meyer, & D. H., Rose (Eds), Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  66. Hunt, J. H., MacDonald, B., Lambert, R., Sugita, T., & Silva, J. (2018). Think-pair-show-share to increase classroom discourse. Teaching Children Mathematics, 25(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.25.2.0078
  67. Lambert, R., & Stylianou, D. A. (2013). Posing cognitively demanding tasks to all students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(8), 500-506. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.8.0500
  68. Lamon, S. J. (2017). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding : essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers(3rd ed.). 이광호, 김형원 역. 분수 지도법 : 교사를 위한 필수 지식과 학습 전략. 경문사. (원저 출판 2012년)
  69. Lee, A., & Griffin C. (2021). Exploring online learning modules for teaching universal design for learning (UDL): Preservice teachers' lesson plan development and implementation. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 47(3), 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1884494
  70. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. G. (2014). Universal design for learning: theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  71. Nelson, L. L. (2019) Design and Deliver: Planning and teaching using universal design for learning. 김남진, 이학준, 김용성 역. 보편적 학습설계: 설계에서 수업까지. 학지사. (원저 출판 2014년)
  72. Post, T. R., Wachsmuth, I., Lesh, R., & Behr, M. J. (1985). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A cognitive analysis. J ournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/748970
  73. Root, J. R., Cox, S. K., Saunders, A., & Gilley, D. (2020). Applying the universal design for learning framework to mathematics instruction for learners with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519887235
  74. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
  75. Scott, L., Bruno, L., Gokita, T., & Thoma, C. A. (2022). Teacher candidates' abilities to develop universal design for learning and universal design for transition lesson plans. International J ournal of Inclusive Education, 26(4), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1651910
  76. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
  77. Simon, M. A., Placa, N., Kara, M., & Avitzur, A. (2018). Empirically-based hypothetical learning trajectories for fraction concepts: Products of the learning through activity research program. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.003
  78. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_2
  79. Smith, J. P. (1995). Competent reasoning with rational numbers, Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 3-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1301_1
  80. Spooner, F., Baker, J. N., Harris, A. A., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Browder, D. M. (2007). Effects of training in universal design for learning on lesson plan development. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280020101
  81. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Kuhne, C., & Lombard, A. P. (2019). Learning pathway for number in the early primary grades. 정영옥 역. (유치원과 초등학교 저학년을 위한) 수의 학습 경로, 교우사. (원저 출판 2012년)
  82. Wilson, P. H., Mojica, G. F., & Confrey, J. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: Supporting teachers' understanding of students' mathematical thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.003
  83. Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edigington, C., & Confrey, J. (2014). Teachers' use of their mathematical knowledge for teaching in learning a mathematics learning trajectory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9256-1