말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.67-76
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-8063(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-5854(eISSN)
한국음성학회 (Korean Society of Speech Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어 평마찰음 /s/ 연장음에 대한 비유창성 양상 연구

Korean listeners' mode of perceiving the durational variations of /s/ as prolongations

  • 박진 (가톨릭관동대학교 언어재활학과) ;
  • 고복순 (국민대학교 교육심리.상담특수교육) ;
  • 박소현 (충남대학교 언어병리학협동과정)
  • Park, Jin (Department of Speech-Language Rehabilitation, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Go, Boksun (Graduate Program of Educational Psychology, School Counseling & Special Education, Kookmin University) ;
  • Park, Sohyun (Department of Interdisciplinary Program of Communication Disorders, Chungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.12
  • 심사 : 2022.06.07
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국어 화자의 말소리 연장에 대한 비유창성 양상(즉, 단속적 vs. 연속적)을 알아보기 위해 진행되었다. 총 35명의 성인(남자 17명, 여자 18명)이 한국어 평마찰음 /s/를 원래 길이에서 20 ms씩 980 ms까지 연장 변조한 총 50개의 자극이 들어 있는 문장을 듣고, 비유창성 정도에 대해 1에서 100점(100에 가까울수록 매우 비유창함) 척도로 평가하였다. 연장음 길이에 따른 비유창함 정도의 지각 양상을 알아보기 위해 곡선추정회귀분석을 실시하였으며, 수정된 R 제곱값(adjusted R2)이 가장 높은 수치의 모형을 선정하였다. 각 연장음에서의 비유창함 정도에 대해 남녀 간 차이를 알아보기 위해 일변량분석[one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)]을 실시하였다. 또한 혼합분산분석(mixed ANOVA)을 통해 전체 연장음 구간을 10분위(decile)로 나누어 각 분위와 남녀 간의 효과, 그리고 두 변수 간 상호작용 유무를 알아보았다. 연구 결과, 연장음의 길이와 비유창함 정도 점수 간의 관계는 S자형 모형의 연속적인 지각 특성을 보였다. 비유창함 정도 지각에 있어 각 연장음에서 유의한 남녀 간 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 분위 분석결과, 연장음 길이가 짧아 상대적으로 유창하게 들리는 구간(1분위)에서는 남녀 간 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 하지만 연장음 길이가 길어 상대적으로 비유창하게 들리는 구간(10분위)에서는 남자가 여자보다 더 비유창하게 지각하였다. 본 연구결과를 바탕으로 이전 연구들과 비교를 통한 논의와 함께 말더듬 평가와 관련해 임상적 제언도 기술하였다.

This study aimed to examine Korean listeners' mode of perceiving sound duration as prolongation, whether dichotomous or continuous. Thirty-five Korean participants (17 men and 18 women) listened to the Korean segment /s/, which was lengthened by 0-980ms in 20-ms increments. Then, the participants were asked to rate each version of the sound based on a rating of one to 100 (the closer to 100, the more disfluent). To examine whether listeners perceived durational variations for the fricative segment dichotomously or continuously, a curve was estimated using the best-fitting regression model for the observed data with the highest adjusted R-squared value. The mode of perceiving durational variations for the segment was continuous (or gradient) rather than discontinuous (or dichotomous). No gender difference was found in the mode of perceiving prolongation. However, there was a significant gender difference in that men rated the most disfluent sounds higher than women. The findings of this study were further discussed in relation to the existing literature, and clinical implications for the assessment of stuttering were presented.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구에 참여해 준 모든 대상자, 그리고 연구 진행에 도움을 준 강민지 선생에게 감사를 드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Adams, M. R., & Runyan, C. M. (1981). Stuttering and fluency: Exclusive events or points on a continuum? Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6(3), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(81)90002-4
  2. Bebout, L., & Arthur, B. (1992). Cross-cultural attitudes toward speech disorders. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 35(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3501.45
  3. Burley, P. M., & Rinaldi, W. (1986). Effects of sex of listener and of stutterer on ratings of stuttering speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11(4), 329-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(86)90020-3
  4. Chon, H. (2014). Comparisons of stuttering severity as measured by Paradise-Fluency Assessment (P-FA-II) and Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4) and correlations among factors in each instrument. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Disorders, 23(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2014.23.2.010
  5. Dietrich, S., Jensen, K. H., & Williams, D. E. (2001). Effects of the label 'stutterer' on student perceptions. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(00)00030-9
  6. Ferguson, J. M. (1999). High school students' attitudes toward inclusion of handicapped students in the regular education classroom. Educational Forum, 63, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729908984409
  7. Guitar, B. (1998). Stuttering: An integrated approach to the nature and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  8. Ha, S. (2009). A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation in the perceptual judgment of hypernasality. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 14(4), 563-573.
  9. Horne, M. D. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer, and parent reactions. (London, UK: Routledge).
  10. Hulit, L. M., & Wirtz, L. (1994). The association of attitudes toward stuttering with selected variables. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 19, 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(94)90003-5
  11. Jones, K., Logan, K. J., & Shrivastav, R. (2005, November). Duration, rate, and phoneme-type effects on listeners' judgments of prolongations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. San Diego, CA.
  12. Kawai, N., & Healey, E. C. (2012, November). Listeners' perception of digitally manipulated moments of audible hesitations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Atlanta, GA: Georgia World Congress Center.
  13. Kawai, N., Healey, E. C., & Carrell, T. D. (2005, November). Identification and discrimination of phoneme prolongation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. San Diego, CA: San Diego Convention Center.
  14. Kawai, N., Healey, E. C., & Carrell, T. D. (2007). Listeners' identification and discrimination of digitally manipulated sounds as prolongations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(2), 1102-1110. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2750158
  15. Kent, R. D. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 5(3), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0503.07
  16. Kim, H. H. (1996, February). Perceptual, acoustical, and physiological tools in ataxic dysarthria management: A case report. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference in the Korean Society of Phonetic Sciences and Speech Technology (pp. 9-22). Seoul, Korea.
  17. Lai, C., Gorman, K., Yuan, J., & Liberman, M. (2007, August). Perception of disfluency: Language differences and listener bias. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2007 (pp.2345-2348). Antwerp, Belgium.
  18. Lee, K. H. (2001). A study of Korean fricatives (Doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Koera.
  19. Lee, S. W. (2006). Fluency disorders. Seoul, Korea: Sigma Press.
  20. Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., & Cooper, F. S. (1958). Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech, 1(3), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100301
  21. Lingwall, J. B., & Bergstrand, G. G. (1979, November). Perceptual boundaries for judgements of "normal," "abnormal," and "stuttered" prolongations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech- Language-Hearing Association. Atlanta, GA: Georgia World Congress Center.
  22. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096701000101
  23. Metz, D. E., Schiavetti, N., & Sacco, P. R. (1990). Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(3), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5503.516
  24. Park, J., Jun, J. P., & Chung, I. K. (2016). College students' perception of prolonged /s/ in Korean. Language & Information Society, 27, 149-169. https://doi.org/10.29211/SOLI.2016.27..006
  25. Park, J., Jun, J. P., & Chung, I. K. (2018). Comparison of perception of the prolonged /s/ in Korean by average adult listeners and speech-language pathologists. Audiology and Speech Research, 14(3), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.2018.14.3.184
  26. Patterson, J., & Pring, T. (1991). Listeners attitudes to stuttering speakers: No evidence for a gender difference. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 16(4), 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(91)90002-T
  27. Pisoni, D. B., Lively, S. E., & Logan, J. S. (1994). Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In J. C. Goodman, & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 121-166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  28. Rami, M. K., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., Holbert, D., & Allen, M. (2005). Choral reading with filtered speech: Effect on stuttering. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(2), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.2.421-431
  29. Riley, G. (2009). Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
  30. Schiavetti, N., Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., & Metz, D. E. (1994). Psychophysical analysis of audiovisual judgments of speech naturalness of nonstutterers and stutterers. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 37(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3701.46
  31. Schroder, M., Melnick, K., Koul, R., & Keller, M. (2002, November). Attitudes towards stuttering: Divergence in gender. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Atlanta, GA.
  32. Sim, H. S. (2000). A study on stereotypes of the Korean male adults who stutter. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 5(1), 1-17.
  33. Susca, M., & Healey, E. C. (2001). Perceptions of simulated stuttering and fluency. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/006)
  34. Tichenor, S. E., Constantino, C., & Yaruss, J. S. (2022). A point of view about fluency. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 65(2), 645-652. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00342
  35. Ustun-Yavuz, M. S., Warmington, M., Gerlach, H., & St. Louis, K. O. (2021). Cultural difference in attitudes towards stuttering among British, Arab and Chinese students: Considering home and host cultures. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(3), 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12617
  36. Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.