DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Inhalation Exposure to Benzene by Activity Stage Using a Caltox Model at the Daesan Petrochemical Complex in South Korea

CalTOX 모델을 이용한 대산 석유화학단지의 활동단계에 따른 벤젠 흡입 노출평가

  • Lee, Jinheon (Department of Environmental Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Minwoo (Department of Environmental Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Park, Changyong (Department of Environmental Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Park, Sanghyun (Chungnam Institute) ;
  • Song, Youngho (Environmental Safety Management Division, The Province of Chungcheongnam-do) ;
  • Kim, Ok (Department of Environmental Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Shin, Jihun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University)
  • Received : 2022.05.24
  • Accepted : 2022.06.20
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

Background: Chemical emissions in the environment have rapidly increased with the accelerated industrialization taking place in recent decades. Residents of industrial complexes are concerned about the health risks posed by chemical exposure. Objectives: This study was performed to suggest modeling methods that take into account multimedia and multi-pathways in human exposure and risk assessment. Methods: The concentration of benzene emitted at industrial complexes in Daesan, South Korea and the exposure of local residents was estimated using the Caltox model. The amount of human exposure based on inhalation rate was stochastically predicted for various activity stages such as resting, normal walking, and fast walking. Results: The coefficient of determination (R2) for the CalTOX model efficiency was 0.9676 and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 0.0035, indicating good agreement between predictions and measurements. However, the efficiency index (EI) appeared to be a negative value at -1094.4997. This can be explained as the atmospheric concentration being calculated only from the emissions from industrial facilities in the study area. In the human exposure assessment, the higher the inhalation rate percentile value, the higher the inhalation rate and lifetime average daily dose (LADD) at each activity step. Conclusions: Prediction using the Caltox model might be appropriate for comparing with actual measurements. The LADD of females was higher ratio with an increase in inhalation rate than those of males. This finding would imply that females may be more susceptible to benzene as their inhalation rate increases.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant of the Kongju National University in 2019 (Award number: 2019-0233-01).

References

  1. Fryer M, Collins C, Ferrier H, Colvile R, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Human exposure modelling for chemical risk assessment: a review of current approaches and research and policy implications. Environ Sci Policy. 2006; 9(3): 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.011
  2. Maddalena R, Mckone T, Layton D, Hsieh D. Comparison of multi-media transport and transformation models: regional fugacity model vs. CalTOX. Chemosphere. 1995; 30(5): 869-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(94)00447-3
  3. Fischhoff B. Understanding long-term environmental risks. J Risk Uncertain. 1990; 3(4): 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353344
  4. Yang JY. Estimation of human exposure to dioxins in Korean urban residents by mulitimedia/multiroute model [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Yonsei University; 2001.
  5. Hoang H, Chiang CF, Lin C, Wu CY, Lee CW, Cheruiyot NK, et al. Human health risk simulation and assessment of heavy metal contamination in a river affected by industrial activities. Environ Pollut. 2021; 285: 117414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117414
  6. David G. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Lond). 2005; 55(3): 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi082
  7. Mckone T, Macleod M. Tracking multiple pathways of human exposure to persistent multimedia pollutants: regional, continental, and global-scale models. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2003; 28: 463-492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105623
  8. Liu C, Bennett DH, Kastenberg WE, Mckone TE, Browne D. A multimedia, multiple pathway exposure assessment of atrazine: fate, transport and uncertainty analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1999; 63(2): 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00045-3
  9. National Research Council. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2007.
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Environmental Models. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2009.
  11. Schlesinger S. Terminology for model credibility. Simulation. 1979; 32(3): 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754977903200304
  12. World Health Organization. Human Exposure Assessment. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42181 [accessed 25 May 2022].
  13. National Research Council. Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants: Advances and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 1991.
  14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. IRIS Assessments of Benzene. Available: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicallanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=276 [accessed 13 June 2022].
  15. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Benzene. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31769947/ [accessed 13 June 2022].
  16. Sekar A, Varghese GK, Ravi Varma MK. Analysis of benzene air quality standards, monitoring methods and concentrations in indoor and outdoor environment. Heliyon. 2019; 5(11): e02918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02918
  17. Teras LR, Diver WR, Deubler EL, Krewski D, Flowers CR, Switchenko JM, et al. Residential ambient benzene exposure in the United States and subsequent risk of hematologic malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2019; 145(10): 2647-2660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32202
  18. Myung H, Baek S. Mid-to Long-term Research on Health Impact Surveys for Residents in Areas Vulnerable to Environmental Pollution in Chungnam Province. Gongju: ChungNam Institute; 2017.
  19. Kim H, Im J, Yun J, Lee J, Jeon J, Lee C. A study on the characteristics of chemicals in major industrial complexes. J Environ Health Sci. 2018; 44(6): 515-523.
  20. Moon J, Yang J, Lim Y, Park S, Shin D. Estimating human exposure to Benzo(a)pyrene through multimedia/multiroute exposure scenario. J Environ Toxicol. 2003; 18(4): 255-269.
  21. Luo Y, Zhang M. Multimedia transport and risk assessment of organophosphate pesticides and a case study in the northern San Joaquin Valley of California. Chemosphere. 2009; 75(7): 969-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.005
  22. Tuncel G, Alpan G. Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: a case study. Comput Ind. 2010; 61(3): 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.09.008
  23. National Institute of Chemical Safety. Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers. Available: https://icis.me.go.kr/prtr/main.do [accessed 25 May 2022].
  24. Korea Meteorological Administration. Wether Information. Available: https://www.weather.go.kr/ [accessed 25 May 2022].
  25. Statistics Korea. Population Statistics Based on Resident Registration. Available: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1007 [accessed 25 May 2022].
  26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment (1992). Available: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=15263 [accessed 25 May 2022].
  27. National Institute of Environmental Research. Korean Exposure Factors Handbook. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.
  28. McKone TE. CalTOX: A Multimedia Total-exposure Model for Hazardous-wastes Sites. Part 3, The Multiple-pathway Exposure Model. Sacramento: California State Government; 1992.
  29. Kuss D, Laurain V, Garnier H, Zug M, Vazquez J. Data-based mechanistic rainfall-runoff continuous-time modelling in urban context. IFAC Proceed Vol. 2009; 42(10): 1780-1785. https://doi.org/10.3182/20090706-3-fr-2004.00296
  30. Nash J, Sutcliffe J. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J Hydrol. 1970; 10(3): 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  31. Yu S, Bae H. Trends in toxic chemical releases in Korea: comparison between total releases and human health risk levels in the period 2004 to 2012. J Environ Policy Adm. 2015; 23(1): 21-41.
  32. Beck MB, Mulkey LA, Barnwell TO. Model Validation for Predictive Exposure Assessments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1994.
  33. United States. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Benzene. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2007.
  34. Bruine de Bruin W, Saw HW, Goldman DP. Political polarization in US residents' COVID-19 risk perceptions, policy preferences, and protective behaviors. J Risk Uncertain. 2020; 61(2): 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-020-09336-3
  35. Haas C. Importance of distributional form in characterizing inputs to Monte Carlo risk assessments. Risk Anal. 1997; 17(1): 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00849.x
  36. Nam BH, Yoon MJ, Lee JH, Choi JS, Baek SO. Goodness-of-fit test of distribution of airborne concentration for probabilistic risk assessment. Proceed Korea Air Pollut Res Assoc Conf. 1998; 2: 134-135.
  37. Jo AR, Kim TS, Seo JK, Yoon HJ, Kim PJ, Choi KH. Uncertainty analysis and application to risk assessment. J Environ Health Sci. 2015; 41(6): 425-437. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2015.41.6.425
  38. Korea Environment Institute. Analysis System for Regional Environmental Status to Support Environmental Assessment: The Status and Potential of i) Onshore Wind Power Generation and ii) Floating Photovoltaic Power Generation. Sejong: Korea Environment Institute; 2017.
  39. National Institute of Environmental Research. Korean Exposure Factors Handbook for Children. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.