Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing (중환자간호학회지)

Korean Society of Critical Care Nursing (한국중환자간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Advance Directives Attitude Scale for Nurses

한국어판 사전연명의료의향에 대한 간호사 태도 도구의 타당도와 신뢰도

  • Received : 2022.05.30
  • Accepted : 2022.06.21
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the nurses' attitude scale toward advance directives of patients. Methods : We translated and back-translated the original tool consisting of 20 questions and tested and verified its content validity. Questions for which its content validity has been verified, a preliminary investigation was conducted among 20 nurses working in ICU, followed by the actual investigation. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0 for Windows and Mac and AMOS version 24.0. To verify the validity, an item analysis was conducted for all 398 samples, and then an exploratory factor analysis for 200 samples that were randomly selected, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis for the remaining 198 samples. Results : Korean version of advance directives attitude scale (K-ADAS) consisting of 14 questions - 7 questions on 'patient rights,' 4 questions on 'role of a nurse,' and 3 questions on 'ethical judgment' - was verified its validity and reliability. Conclusion : In this study, the validity and reliability of the K-ADAS have been verified. We expect the verified tool to be useful in various fields that measuring the nurses' attitude toward advance directives of patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YJ, Lee MN. Attitude on nursing ethical values and on brain death organ donation of hospital nurse. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2011;11(10):312-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.10312
  2. Byun EK, Choi HR, Choi AL, Kim NM, Hong KH, Kim HS. An investigative research on the attitudes of intensive care unit nurses and families on terminating life support. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2003;9(1):112-124.
  3. Vanderspank-Wright B, Efstathiou N, Vandyk AD. Critical care nurses' experiences of withdrawal of treatment: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018;77:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.012
  4. Kim SM, Hong YS, Kim HS. History of Advance Directives. The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. 2010;13(3):193-204. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2010.13.3.193
  5. Woo MK, Kim M. Nurses' experiences of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) by the narrative inquiry. 2013;25(3):322-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.3.322
  6. Um JK, Suh GH, Park S. Life-sustaining treatment attitude, stress and advanced directives awareness in ICU nurse. Journal of Korean Bioethics Association. 2018;19(1):37-50. https://doi.org/10.37305/JKBA.2018.06.19.1.37
  7. Kim JH. Court decisions on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment and related problems associated with legalization. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2012;55(12):1178-1187. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1178
  8. Ko CK. Advance directives and the roles of advanced practice nurses. Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing. 2010;3(2):91-99.
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Enforcement decree of the medical care decision act for the hospice relief medical and disease patients [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare Korea; 2017[cited 2019 March 28]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=194941&efYd=20170804#0000
  10. Scherer Y, Jezewski MA, Graves B, Wu YWB, Bu X. Advance directives and end of-Life decision making: Survey of critical care nurses' knowledge, attitude, and experience. Critical Care Nurse. 2006;26(4):30-34. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2006.26.4.30
  11. van Asselt D. Advance directives; prerequisites and usefulness. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2006;39(5):371-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-006-0373-7
  12. Park HW. Implications of the hospice, palliative care, and life-sustaining treatment decision-making act. Justice. 2017;158(3):670-701.
  13. Hong YS. Moral reflextion in hospice - centring on advance medical directive. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 2008;11(2):73-77.
  14. Kim SH. Awareness and attitudes toward advance directives among Korean adults. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental of Nursing. 2010;17(4):450-459.
  15. Lee SM. Patient and family determination in medical decision-making. The Korean Society for Medical Ethic. 2009;12(4):323-334. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2009.12.4.323
  16. Yang SJ. Recognition on advance directives and well-dying in intensive care unit nurses [Matere's thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University; 2014. p. 7-9.
  17. Haras MS, Astroth KS, Woith WL, Kossman SP. Exploring advance care planning from the nephrology nurse perspective: A literature review. Nephrology Nursing Journal. 2015;23-35.
  18. Jezewski MA, Brown JK, Yow-Wu BW, Meeker MA, Jui-Ying F, Xiaoyan B. Oncology nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding advance directives. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2005;32(2):319-327. https://doi.org/10.1188/04.ONF.319-327
  19. Jezewski MA, Jui-Ying, F. Emergency nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and experiential survey on advance directives. Applied Nursing Research, 2007;20(3):132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2006.05.003
  20. Nolan MT, Bruder M. Patients' attitudes toward advance directives and end-of-life treatment decisions. Nursing Outlook, 1997;45:204-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(97)90066-X
  21. Akabayashi A, Slingsby BT, Kai I. Perspectives on advance directives in Japanese society: A population-based questionnaire survey. Bio Med Central Medical Ethics. 2003;4(5):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-4-5
  22. Cheon H, Kim E. Reliability and validity of an instrument assessing advance directives for nurse. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 2019;22(3):134-143. https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2019.22.3.134
  23. Lee SJ, Kim HY. Experience of life-sustaining treatment in patient care among intensive care unit nurses: Phenomenological approach. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental of Nursing. 2016;23(2):172-183. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2016.23.2.172
  24. Hoffman AJ, Scott LD. Role stress and career satisfaction among registered nurses by work shift patterns. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2003;33(6):337-342. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200306000-00006
  25. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education; 2010. p. 111-113.
  26. Yeo WS. Multivariate behavioral research for social sciences and marketing. 2nd ed. Seoul: Minyoungsa;2006. p. 120-143.
  27. Tak JK. Psychological testing: An understanding of development and evaluation method. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2007. p. 163-194.
  28. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1998;1(1):104-121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
  29. World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of insturments. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2016 September 20]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en
  30. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 1986;35(6):382-385.
  31. Lee EO, Lim NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae J, et al. Nursing research and statistics. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2009. p. 1-789.
  32. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2007;30(4):459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  33. Woo JP. Understanding of structural equation model concept. Seoul: Hannarae; 2012. p. 250-318.
  34. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 30-34, 83-84, 149-156.
  35. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103(3):411-423. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411