DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Economic Analysis of RE100 Implementation Methods in South Korea

국내 RE100 이행방안의 경제성 비교분석 연구

  • An, Sang Hyo (Energy Environment Policy and Technology, Graduate School of Energy and Environment (KU-KIST Green School), Korea University) ;
  • Woo, JongRoul (Energy Environment Policy and Technology, Graduate School of Energy and Environment (KU-KIST Green School), Korea University)
  • 안상효 (에너지환경정책기술학과, 에너지환경대학원(그린스쿨), 고려대학교) ;
  • 우종률 (에너지환경정책기술학과, 에너지환경대학원(그린스쿨), 고려대학교)
  • Received : 2022.05.27
  • Accepted : 2022.06.08
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

The Global RE100 campaign is a one of the voluntary campaign, but it has a lot of influence on domestic companies that have not yet joined the Global RE100. Accordingly, the Korean government introduced the Korean RE100 (K-RE100) system to prepare an institutional mechanism for domestic companies to respond to RE100. However, in Korea, due to the high LCOE of renewable energy and institutional limitations of the power transaction system, there is a limit for companies to implement RE100 in various ways. Therefore, in this study, the implementation cost of RE100 for green tariff, REC purchase, third-party PPA, direct(or corporate) PPA, and self-generation was compared and analyzed to derive the order of implementation with the net present value (NPV) of costs incurred over 20 years. As a result, self-construction was analyzed as the most economical method, but the implementation through the green tariff seemed to be the most realistic implementation method so far. However, considering the gradually falling LCOE, third-party PPA and direct PPA could be secured competitiveness against green tariff in 2025 and 2026. Then it could allow the companies to have various portfolios for implementation of RE100.

Keywords

References

  1. 2050 Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth Commission, "2050 Carbon Neutrality Scenarios," https://www.2050cnc.go.kr/base/board/read?boardManagementNo=4&boardNo=101&searchCategory=&page=1&searchType=&searchWor d=&menuLevel=2&menuNo=15 (2021).
  2. RE100, "RE100 members," https://www.there100.org/re100-members (2022).
  3. RE100, "RE100 annual disclosure report 2021(Stepping up : RE100 gathers speed in challenging markets)," RE100 Climate Group & CDP (2022).
  4. Korea Energy Agency, "K-RE100 Implementation method Guide," https://www.knrec.or.kr/biz/introduce/new_policy/intro_kre100.do?gubun=A (2022).
  5. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Notification on direct PPA of renewable energy electricity suppliers (Proposal for enactment)," Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy Notification No. 2021-874 (2021).
  6. RE100, "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): Technical," RE100 Climate Group and CDP (2022).
  7. Enterdata, "World Energy and Climate Statistics," https://yearbook.enerdata.co.kr/electricity/electricity-domestic-consumption-data.html (2022).
  8. Cho, Y. T., "POSRI Issue Report : Achievements and implications of implementation of the K-RE100 for a year," Posco Research Institute (2022).
  9. Byun, S. G., "Kepco signed Third-party PPA with Hyundai Elevator for the firs time," Etnews, https://m.etnews.com/20220411000016?obj=Tzo4OiJzdGRDbGFzcyI6Mjp7czo3OiJyZWZlcmVyIjtOO3M6NzoiZm9yd2FyZCI7czoxMzoid2ViIHRvIG1vYmlsZSI7fQ%3D%3D (2022).
  10. Yun, B. H., "SK E&S and Amore Pacific signed the first renewable energy PPA in Korea," Electimes, https://www.electimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=302308 (2022).
  11. Lee, Y. J., Cho, M. S., Chae, H. J., Kim, J. C., Lee, S. C., "The status of RE100 and its implications in Korea," The Korean Society of Climate Change Research, 14(1), 43-52 (2019).
  12. Shin, H. Y., Park, J. B., "Analysis of RE100 status in Korean and international and plan of activation for RE100 in Korea," KIEE, 70(11), 2021.11, 1645-1654 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5370/KIEE.2021.70.11.1645
  13. Park, D. G., Kim, J. Y., "A study on comparison and improvement of RE100 system," KIEE, 2021.05, 264-265 (2021).
  14. Lee, W. N., Cho, K. S., "A study on the global status and improvement of the effectiveness of RE100 implementation in Korea," KIEE (2021).
  15. Lee, J. H., Park, J. Y., "Reorganization of Legal System to Accelerate Distributed Generation - RE100 Campaign and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)," Korea Environmental Law Association 43(3): 207-241 (2021).
  16. Oh, J. H., "Comparison of renewable energy price and proposal policy implications for expending RE100 in Korea," Seoul National University of Science and Technology (2021).
  17. Kwon, Y. O., Lee, S. E., Kim, T. H., "Analysis of the effect of green premium tariff on renewable investments," KIEE 2021.7 666-667 (2021).
  18. Oh, W. T., "Market-oriented approach to expand small-scale renewable energy : Focusing on RE100," Soongsil university (2018).
  19. Lee, J. W., Kim, S. W., "Cost analysis of various corporate sourcing scenarios for achieving RE100," KIEE 2020(7): 163-164 (2020).
  20. Ministry of Environment, "Guideline for the management of greenhouse gas target in the public sector" (2022).
  21. Publicdata Portal, "Power generation by PV generation time : KOEN Samcheonpo #5), https://www.data.go.kr/data/15050344/fileData.do (2021).
  22. Lee, K. D., Kim, K. H., "Establishment and operation of midium- and long-term LCOE forecast system for expansion of renewable energy supply(1/5)," KEEI (2020).
  23. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center, "2020 Korean emissions trading system report," No. 11-1480906-000001-10 (2022).
  24. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Results of Green Tariff bidding (7th, Feb ~ 21st, Feb) for the first half," MOTIE Press news, (2022).
  25. Kwon, K. R., Kim, Y. J., Yang, Y. B., Cho, E. B., "Stranded K-RE100, focusing on grid fees and unreasonable third-party PPA guideline," Solutions for Our Climate (2021).
  26. Lim, J. H., "Increase carbon emission allocation by 10% + α," Seoul Newspaper, https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20210518003006 (2021).
  27. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Strategies for promotion of distributed energy" (2021).