한국환경과학회지 (Journal of Environmental Science International)

  • 제31권6호
  • /
  • Pages.461-470
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-4517(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3503(eISSN)
한국환경과학회 (The Korean Environmental Sciences Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

저수지 댐 붕괴 지점에 따른 침수 양상 비교

Comparison of Flooding Patterns according to the Location of the Collapse of Dam body

  • 류단쉰 (대구대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이길하 (대구대학교 토목공학과)
  • Danxun, Liu (Department of Civil Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Gil-Ha (Department of Civil Engineering, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.29
  • 심사 : 2022.05.23
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

When an agricultural soil dam collapses, the extent of inundation and the rate of diffusion vary depending on where the collapse occurs in the dam body. In this study, a dam collapse scenario was established and a two-dimensional numerical model FLO-2D was used to closely examine the inundation pattern of the downstream residential area according to the dam collapse point. The results were presented as a flood risk map showing the changes and patterns of the extent of inundation spread. The flood level and the time to reach the maximum water level vary depending on the point of collapse, and the inundation of the downstream area proceeds rapidly in the order of the midpoint, left point, and right point collapse. In the left collapse point, the submergence appeared about 0.5 hour slower than the middle point, and the right collapse point appeared about 1 hour slower than the middle point. Since the relative damage pattern is different depending on the dam collapse point, insurance and disaster countermeasures will have to be established differently.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alvarez, M., Puertas, J., Pena, E., Bermudez, M., 2018, Two-Dimensional Dam-Break Flood Analysis in Data-Scarce Regions: The Case Study of Chipembe Dam, Mozambique, Water, 9(6), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060432
  2. Costa, J. E., 1985, Floods from dam failures, Open-File Rep, USGS, Denver, 85-560.
  3. FLO-2D software Inc., 2005, FLO-2D PRO Reference manual, Nutrioso, AZ.
  4. Fread, D. L., 1977, The development and testing of a dam-break flood forecasting model, Proc., Dam-Break Flood Routing Model Workshop, US Water Research Council, Washington, D. C., 164-197.
  5. Fread, D. L., 1988a, BREACH, An Erosion model for earthen dam failures, U.S.:National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Silver Spring, MD.
  6. Fread, D. L., 1988b, The NWS DAMBRK MODEL: Theoretical background/User documentation, NWS.
  7. French, R. H., 1986, Open-channel Hydraulics, MCGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore.
  8. Froehlich, D. C., 2016, Predicting Peak Discharge from Gradually Breached Embankment Dam, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21(11), 0401-6041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001424
  9. Gallegos, H. A., Schubert, J. E., Sander, B. F., 2012, Structural damage prediction in a high-velocity urban dam-break flood: A field-scale assessment of predictive skill, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 138, 1249-1262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000427
  10. ICOLD, 1998, World register of dams: 4th updating, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris.
  11. Joo, Y. H., 2010, The Experimental study of the reinforcement technique for the breach damage mitigation on the small scale reservoir, Master's thesis, Hongik university, 95p (in Korean with English abstract).
  12. Lee, K. H., Kim, S. W., Yu, S., Kim, S. H., Cho, J., Kim, J. M., 2013, Building a hydrograph triggered by earth dam-break for flood hazard map, The Journal of Engineering Geology, 23(4), 381-387 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.9720/KSEG.2013.4.381
  13. Lee, K. H., Son, M. H., W., Kim, S. W., Yu, S., Cho, J., Kim, J. M., Jung, K. J., 2014, Sensitivity analysis of model parameters of dam-break/FLO-2D coupled model to flood inundation, The Journal of Engineering Geology, 24(1), 53-67 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.9720/KSEG.2014.1.53
  14. Macchione, F., 2008, Model for Predicting Floods due to Earthen Dam Breaching. I: Formulation and Evaluation, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(12), 1688-1696. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1688)
  15. Morris, M. W., 2009, Modelling Breach Initiation and Growth, FLOOD site Report, T06-08-02.
  16. Morris, M. W., 2011, Breaching of Earth Embankments and Dams, PhD Thesis, The Open University, England.
  17. Morris, M. W., Mohamed, M. A. A. M., Vaskinn, K. A., 2007, Breach formation: Field test and laboratory experiments, Journal of Hydraulic Research 45(Extra Issue), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521828
  18. Neelz, S., Pender, G., 2013, Bench marking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages, Report No. SC120002., Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
  19. Peng, M., Zhang, L. M., 2012a, Analysis of human risk due to dam break floods - part2: Application to Tangjiashan Landslide Dam Failure, Nat Harzard, 64, 903-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0275-5
  20. Peng, M., Zhang, L. M., 2012b, Breaching parameters of landslide dams, Landslides, 9(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0271-y
  21. Pierce, M. W., Thornton, C. I., Abt, S. R., 2010, Predicting Peak Outflow from Breached Embankment Dams, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(5), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000197
  22. Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., Miller, N., 1983, Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 109(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:1(62)
  23. Singh, V. P., 1996, Dam breach modeling technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic, 242.
  24. Singh, V. P., Scarlator, P. D., 1985, Breach erosion of earthfill dams and flied routing: BEED model, New york : Research Rep. Prepared for Army Research Office, Battelle, Research Triangel Park, North Carolina, 131.
  25. Soares-Frazao, S., Canelas, R., Cao, Z., Cea, L., Chaudhry, H. M., Die Moran, A., Kadi, K. E., Ferreira, R., Cadorniga, I. F., Gonzalez-Ramirez, N., 2012, Dam-break flows over mobile beds: Experiment sand bench mark tests for numerical models, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50, 364-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.689682
  26. Son, M., 2014, Analysis on the Sensitivity of the Dam-Break Model Parameters to Inundation Area using FLO-2D, Daegu University, Korea.
  27. Spada, E., Sinagra, M., Tucciarelli, T., Biondi, D., 2017, Unsteady State Water Level Analysis for Discharge Hydrograph Estimation in Rivers with Torrential Regime: The Case Study of the February 2016 Flood Event in the Crati River, South Italy, after(https://www.mdpi.com/2073-444/9/4/288/htm).
  28. Wahl, T. L., 1998, Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: A literature review and needs assessment, Dam Safety Research Report, No.DSo-98-004, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, 60.
  29. Walder, J., O'connor, J. E., 1997, Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earthen dams, Water Resources Research, 33(10), 2337-2348. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01616
  30. West, M., Morris, M. W., 2018, Hassan A guide to breach prediction, HR Wallingford, UK.
  31. Wu, W., 2013, Simplified Physically Based Model of Earthen Embankment Breaching, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE, 139(8), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741
  32. Wu, W., 2016, Inputs and Outputs of DL Breach A Simplified Physically Based Dam/Levee Breach Model, Clarkson University, NY.