DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Public Diplomacy and Social Capital: Bridging Theory and Activities

  • 투고 : 2021.07.31
  • 심사 : 2022.04.25
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30

초록

Public diplomacy activities can benefit from social capital theory, when its social dynamics is elucidated in the investment of complex social networks and in the establishment and management of relationships with foreign publics. Social capital theory explains that actors can produce purposive actions to mobilize resources in social structures, which thus explains the dynamics of social interactions. In response to the lack of conceptual frameworks for understanding public diplomacy activities within social capital theory, we conducted a narrative literature review that intends to identify the means through which international actors, such as governments, engage with foreign publics through the dynamics of social networks and the resources embedded in them. In addition, we explored the multidimensional characteristics of social capital to enhance the comprehension of the manner in which actors access, share, and maintain resources in target communities, institutions, or organizations through public diplomacy activities. In summary, we highlight the importance of new theoretical explorations on the application of social capital theory to public diplomacy and the need for a research agenda in the field.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Altunisik, M. B. (2008). The possibilities and limits of Turkey's soft power in the Middle East. Insight Turkey, 41-54.
  3. Arceneaux, P. and Powers, S. International Broadcasting: Public Diplomacy as a Game in a Marketplace of Loyalties. In: Snow, N. and Cull, N.J. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 50-63). Routledge
  4. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2019). Diasporas and public diplomacy: Distinctions and future prospects. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 51-64. Available at https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14101015
  5. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and applied social psychology, 10(1), 3-12. Available at https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2
  6. Cvetkovich, G. (2013). Social trust and the management of risk. Routledge.
  7. Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Influence (Vol. 3). A. Michel.
  8. Claypool, H. M., Mackie, D. M., Garcia-Marques, T., McIntosh, A., & Udall, A. (2004). The effects of personal relevance and repetition on persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 22(3), 310-335. Available at https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.3.310.35970
  9. Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 616(1), 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311863
  10. Cull, N.J. (2009a). Public Diplomacy before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. In: Snow, N. and Taylor, P.M. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 19-23). Routledge
  11. Cull, N.J. (2009b). Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. (No. 12). Figueroa Press
  12. Cull, N.J. (2019). Public Diplomacy: Foundations for Global Engagement in the Digital Age. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Di Martino, L. (2020). The Spectrum of Listening. In: Snow, N. and Cull, N.J. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 21-29). Routledge
  14. Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann
  15. Dinnie, K. and Sevin, E. (2020). The Changing Nature of Nation Branding: Implications for Public Diplomacy. In: Snow, N. and Cull, N.J. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 137-144). Routledge.
  16. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2017). The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Psychology Press.
  17. Edwards, L. (2011). Public Relations and Society: A Bourdieuvian Perspective. In: Public Relations, Society & Culture. (pp. 73-86). Routledge.
  18. Farquhar, P. H. (1994). Strategic Challenges for Branding. Marketing Management, 3(2), 8.
  19. Farr, J. (2004). Social Capital: A Conceptual History. Political Theory, 32(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703254978
  20. Fisher, A. (2010). Mapping the Great Beyond: Identifying Meaningful Networks in Public Diplomacy. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy. Available at: https://uscpublicdi plomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u35361/2010%20Paper%202_0.pdf. Accessed on: July 10, 2021
  21. Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2011). US public diplomacy in a post-9/11 world: From messaging to mutuality. Figueroa Press.
  22. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2012). Defining Strategic Publics in a Networked World - Public Diplomacy Challenge at Home and Abroad. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341236
  23. Fitzpatrick, K.R. (2013). Public Diplomacy and Ethics: From Soft Power to Social Conscience. In: Zaharna, R.S., Arsenault, A., and Fisher, A. (Eds.). Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 43-57). Routledge.
  24. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
  25. Goldin, C. (2016). "Human Capital." In: Handbook of Cliometrics, ed. Claude Diebolt and Michael Haupert, 55-86. Springer Verlag.
  26. Gregory, B. (2008). Public Diplomacy and National Security: Lessons from the US Experience. Small Wars Journal (August 2008). Available at: https://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/82-gregory.pdf. Accessed on: July 30, 2021
  27. Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., & Joinson, A. N. (2020). "It wouldn't happen to me": Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 143, 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102498
  28. Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the 'New' Public Diplomacy. In: Melissen, J. (Ed.). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 28-43). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_2
  29. Hocking, B. (2008). Reconfiguring Public Diplomacy: From Competition To Collaboration. In: Welsh, J. and Fearn, D. (Eds.). Engagement: Public Diplomacy in a Globalised World. (pp. 62-75). Foreign & Commonwealth Office
  30. Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1086/208544
  31. Ihlen, O. (2005). The power of social capital: Adapting Bourdieu to the study of public relations. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 492-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.007
  32. Iwasaki, K., Sawada, Y., & Aldrich, D. P. (2017). Social capital as a shield against anxiety among displaced residents from Fukushima. Natural Hazards, 89(1), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2971-7
  33. Kyne, D., & Aldrich, D. P. (2020). Capturing bonding, bridging, and linking social capital through publicly available data. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12183
  34. Krebs, V., & Holley, J. (2002). Building sustainable communities through network building. Available at: http://www.orgnet.com/BuildingNetworks.pdf. Accessed on: July 31, 2021
  35. Lee, G., & Ayhan, K. (2015). Why do we need non-state actors in public diplomacy?: Theoretical discussion of relational, networked and collaborative public diplomacy. Journal of International and Area Studies, 57-77.
  36. Lin, N. (2008). A network theory of social capital. The Handbook of Social Capital, 50(1), 69.
  37. Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19). Cambridge University Press.
  38. Lochner, K., Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health & place, 5(4), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(99)00016-7
  39. Macdonald, E. K., & Sharp, B. M. (2000). Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00070-8
  40. Maoz, Z., Terris, L. G., Kuperman, R. D., & Talmud, I. (2007). What is the enemy of my enemy? Causes and consequences of imbalanced international relations, 1816-2001. The Journal of Politics, 69(1), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00497.x
  41. Mark, S. (2009). A greater role for cultural diplomacy. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
  42. Matz, S. C., Appel, R. E., & Kosinski, M. (2020). Privacy in the age of psychological targeting. Current opinion in psychology, 31, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.010
  43. Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. (2018). Reply to Sharp et al.: Psychological targeting produces robust effects. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811106115
  44. Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as a practical approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114(48), 12714-12719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710966114
  45. Marx, Karl. [1867] 1977. Capital. Vol. 1. Translated by B. Fowkes. Vintage Books.
  46. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  47. Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In: Melissen, J. (Ed.). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 3-27). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_1
  48. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2021, July 31). Japan House. https://www.mofa.go.jp/p_pd/pds/page25e_000145.html
  49. Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
  50. Nye, J.S. (2010). The New Public Diplomacy. Project Syndicate (February 10). Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-new-public-diplomacy-2010-02. Accessed on: July 30, 2021
  51. Olins, W. (2005). Making a National Brand. In: Melissen, J. (Ed.). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. (pp. 169-179). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_9
  52. Patulny, R. V., & Svendsen, G. L. H. (2007). Exploring the social capital grid: bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710722742
  53. Portes, A. (1996). The Downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 18, 94.
  54. Putnam, R. D. (1994). Social capital and public affairs. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824796
  55. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
  56. Rana, K. S. (2013). Diaspora diplomacy and public diplomacy. In: Zaharna, R.S., Arsenault, A., and Fisher, A. (Eds.). Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 84-99). Routledge.
  57. Riordan, S. (2005). Dialogue-based Public Diplomacy: A New Foreign Policy Paradigm? In: Melissen, J. (Ed.). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 180-195). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_1
  58. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
  59. Sevin, E. (2017). Public Diplomacy: The New Foreign Policy "Tool." In Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of Foreign Policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey (pp. 19-49). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49334-3_2
  60. Sharp, B., Danenberg, N., & Bellman, S. (2018). Psychological targeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), E7890-E7890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810436115
  61. Sherif, M. (1988). The robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. [Orig. pub. as Intergroup conflict and group relations]. Wesleyan University Press.
  62. Singh, J. P., & MacDonald, S. (2017). Soft power today: measuring the influences and effects. Edinburgh: The Institute for International Cultural Relations, The University of Edinburgh.
  63. Slaughter, A. M. (2009). America's Edge: Power in the Networked Century. Foreign Affairs, 94-113.
  64. Snow, N. (2020). Rethinking Public Diplomacy in the 2020s. In: Snow, N. and Cull, N.J. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 3-12). Routledge
  65. Steg, L., Keizer, K., Buunk, A. P., & Rothengatter, T. (Eds.). (2017). Applied social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
  66. Surowiec, P. (2012). Towards corpo-nationalism: a Bourdieusian study exploring the relationship between national branding and the reproduction of Polishness (1999-2010). (Doctoral dissertation, Bournemouth University).
  67. Surowiec, P. and Manor, I. (2021). Public Diplomacy and the Politics of Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54552-9
  68. Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650-667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013
  69. Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Building and measuring sustainable networks of organizations and social capital: Postwar public diplomacy in Croatia. In: Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 117-130). Routledge.
  70. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
  71. Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.12.001
  72. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135
  73. Van Ham, P. (2013). Social power in public diplomacy. In: Zaharna, R.S., Arsenault, A., and Fisher, A. (Eds.). Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 31-42). Routledge.
  74. Zaharna, R.S. (2009). Mapping out a Spectrum of Public Diplomacy Initiatives: Information and Relational Communication Frameworks. In: Snow, N. and Taylor, P.M. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. (pp. 86-100). Routledge
  75. Zaharna, R. S. (2010). Battles to Bridges: US Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11. Springer.
  76. Zaharna, R. S., Arsenault, A., and Fisher, A. (Eds.). (2014). Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
  77. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154