Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Revitalization of Modern Architecture as a Collective Space - Proposal Design for Boerentoren Remodeling -

집합적 공간으로서의 근현대건축물 재활성화 설계 - 뵈렌토렌 리모델링 설계안을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2022.02.24
  • Accepted : 2022.06.08
  • Published : 2022.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study calls the existing regeneration strategies in the revitalization of modern architecture into question and emphasizes the importance of giving new values such as spatial utilization and improvement of collectivity according to the demands of consumers. The existing ways of preserving and utilizing historical space aimed at stimulating curiosity use form and architectural style that differ from modern space. The modern space has been made into a viewing spectacle rather than for utilization purposes. However, various spaces with modern values are now recognized as historical heritages, which has led to various discussions about its use, and expanded various spatial experiments that recycle a space by presenting it with new values. At present, the discussion on space regeneration has developed considerably; the use of modern and present age buildings is being dominated by the conversion of industrial heritage over artistic and cultural spaces. Attempts at complex spatialization are relatively insufficient including daily functions such as residential and work related. The Boerentoren revitalization is an experiment on how buildings with historical value can contribute to urban collectivity and community formation; rather than being occupied by specific subjects, its purpose is to make buildings work in urban functions within the urban context. Utilization of these resources is an effective way to strengthen the city's community, and can be seen as the realization of sustainability that regenerates the city's idle and symbolic space.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년도 남서울대학교 학술연구비 지원에 의해 연구되었음

References

  1. Albannaa, A.(2019). The Other Museum: the Experience of the Interior Space at the Adaptive Reuse Museum, The Institution and Its Historically Preserved Building. 4.
  2. Brooker, G. & Stone, S. (2004). Re-readings. Interior Architecture and the Design Principles of Remodeling Existing Buildings. London, RIBA Enterprises.
  3. Brooker, G. & Stone, S. (2008). Context + Environment. Lausanne. 22.
  4. De Sola-Morales, M. (1992). Public and collective space: the urbanization of the private domain as a new challenge, Oase. 33. 3-8.
  5. EEA(2020). Construction and Demolition Waste: Challenges and Opportunities in a Circular Economy. Retrieved May 17, 2022 from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/construction-and-demolition-waste-challenges/construction-and-demolition-waste-challenges
  6. Gewirtzman, D.(2016). Adaptive reuse architecture documentation and analysis. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology. 5(3). 172
  7. Gultekin, E.(2019). Heritage and Preservation of Modern Architecture.
  8. Hertzberger, H. (2001). Space and the Architect: Lessons in Architecture 2. Rotterdam. 010 Publishers.
  9. Kim, D.(2018). Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Buildings for Sustainability; Analysis of Sustainability and Social Values of industrial Facades.
  10. Macdonald, S. (2013). Breaking the barriers to conserving modern heritage. The GCI Newsletter. 28.
  11. Plevoets, B. & Van Cleempoel, K.(2011). Adaptive Reuse as a Strategy towards Conservation of Cultural Heritage: a Literature Review, 155-164
  12. Prudon, T. (2008). Preservation of Modern Architecture. N.J. Wiley 5.
  13. Scheerlinck, K. (2013). Collective Spaces Streetscape Territories Notebook. 2013. 7-8, 44-66.
  14. UN WCED(1987). Our Common Future.
  15. UNDP(2015). Sustainable Development Goals.
  16. Velthuis, K. & Spennemann, D. (2007). The Future of Defunct Religious Buildings: Dutch Approaches to Their Adaptive Re-use.
  17. Wong, L. (2017). Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. Basel: Birkhauser