참고문헌
- Newman TB, Browner WS, Cummings SR, Hulley SB. Designing studies of medical tests. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB, eds. Designing clinical research, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013:171-187
- Rodger M, Ramsay T, Fergusson D. Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier. Trials 2012;13:137
- Liu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRITAI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension. BMJ 2020;370:m3164
- Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRITAI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ 2020;370:m3210
- Park SH, Han K. Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiology 2018;286:800-809 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171920
- Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ. AI in health and medicine. Nat Med 2022;28:31-38 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0
- Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med 2019;17:195
- NEJM Group. What is value-based healthcare? NEJM Catalyst Web site. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0558. Published January 1, 2017. Accessed October 30, 2022
- Plana D, Shung DL, Grimshaw AA, Saraf A, Sung JJY, Kann BH. Randomized clinical trials of machine learning interventions in health care: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2233946
- Zhou Q, Chen ZH, Cao YH, Peng S. Clinical impact and quality of randomized controlled trials involving interventions evaluating artificial intelligence prediction tools: a systematic review. NPJ Digit Med 2021;4:154
- Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Badalamenti M, Desai M, Chandrasekar VT, et al. Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:793-802
- Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu Q, Gu C, Wang Z. Artificial intelligenceaided colonoscopy for polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021;31:1143-1149 https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0777
- Deliwala SS, Hamid K, Barbarawi M, Lakshman H, Zayed Y, Kandel P, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a metaanalysis and trial sequential analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021;36:2291-2303 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03929-3
- Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Jovani M, Chandrasekar VT, et al. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;93:77-85. e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059
- Park SH, Choi J, Byeon JS. Key principles of clinical validation, device approval, and insurance coverage decisions of artificial intelligence. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:442-453 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0048
- Paez A, Rovers M, Hutchison K, Rogers W, Vasey B, McCulloch P; IDEAL Collaboration. Beyond the RCT: when are randomized trials unnecessary for new therapeutic devices, and what should we do instead? Ann Surg 2022;275:324-331 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005053
- Frieden TR. Evidence for health decision making - beyond randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2017;377:465-475 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1614394
- Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet 2005;365:82-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8
- Park SH, Han K, Jang HY, Park JE, Lee JG, Kim DW, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithms for medical diagnosis. Radiology 2022 Nov 8. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220182
- Vagal A, Saba L. Artificial intelligence in "code stroke"-a paradigm shift: do radiologists need to change their practice? Radiol Artif Intell 2022;4:e210204
- Morey JR, Zhang X, Yaeger KA, Fiano E, Marayati NF, Kellner CP, et al. Real-world experience with artificial intelligence-based triage in transferred large vessel occlusion stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;50:450-455 https://doi.org/10.1159/000515320
- Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, Lemmers N, Mulder MP, Berge P, et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;323:1052-1060 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0592
- Park SY, Park JE, Kim H, Park SH. Review of statistical methods for evaluating the performance of survival or other time-to-event prediction models (from conventional to deep learning approaches). Korean J Radiol 2021;22:1697-1707 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0223
- Nagendran M, Chen Y, Lovejoy CA, Gordon AC, Komorowski M, Harvey H, et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ 2020;368:m689
- Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton DA, Collins GS, Denaxas S, et al. Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ 2022;377:e070904
- Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021;374:n2061
- Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, Campbell B, Campbell M, Feinberg J, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 2019;269:211-220 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794