Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제23권11호
  • /
  • Pages.1044-1054
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement in Image Quality and Visibility of Coronary Arteries, Stents, and Valve Structures on CT Angiography by Deep Learning Reconstruction

  • Chuluunbaatar Otgonbaatar (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jae-Kyun Ryu (Medical Imaging AI Research Center, Canon Medical Systems Korea) ;
  • Jaemin Shin (Department of Radiology, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital) ;
  • Ji Young Woo (Department of Radiology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung Wook Seo (Department of Radiology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Hackjoon Shim (Medical Imaging AI Research Center, Canon Medical Systems Korea) ;
  • Dae Hyun Hwang (Department of Radiology, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.10
  • 심사 : 2022.08.26
  • 발행 : 2022.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) method improves the image quality, stent evaluation, and visibility of the valve apparatus in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) when compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) methods. Materials and Methods: CCTA images of 51 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 63.9 ± 9.8 years, 36 male) who underwent examination at a single institution were reconstructed using DLR, FBP, and hybrid IR methods and reviewed. CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and stent evaluation, including 10%-90% edge rise slope (ERS) and 10%-90% edge rise distance (ERD), were measured. Quantitative data are summarized as the mean ± SD. The subjective visual scores (1 for worst -5 for best) of the images were obtained for the following: overall image quality, image noise, and appearance of stent, vessel, and aortic and tricuspid valve apparatus (annulus, leaflets, papillary muscles, and chordae tendineae). These parameters were compared between the DLR, FBP, and hybrid IR methods. Results: DLR provided higher Hounsfield unit (HU) values in the aorta and similar attenuation in the fat and muscle compared with FBP and hybrid IR. The image noise in HU was significantly lower in DLR (12.6 ± 2.2) than in hybrid IR (24.2 ± 3.0) and FBP (54.2 ± 9.5) (p < 0.001). The SNR and CNR were significantly higher in the DLR group than in the FBP and hybrid IR groups (p < 0.001). In the coronary stent, the mean value of ERS was significantly higher in DLR (1260.4 ± 242.5 HU/mm) than that of FBP (801.9 ± 170.7 HU/mm) and hybrid IR (641.9 ± 112.0 HU/mm). The mean value of ERD was measured as 0.8 ± 0.1 mm for DLR while it was 1.1 ± 0.2 mm for FBP and 1.1 ± 0.2 mm for hybrid IR. The subjective visual scores were higher in the DLR than in the images reconstructed with FBP and hybrid IR. Conclusion: DLR reconstruction provided better images than FBP and hybrid IR reconstruction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Halliburton SS, Tanabe Y, Partovi S, Rajiah P. The role of advanced reconstruction algorithms in cardiac CT. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017;7:527-538 https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.08.12
  2. Blanke P, Naoum C, Webb J, Dvir D, Hahn RT, Grayburn P, et al. Multimodality imaging in the context of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: establishing consensus among modalities and disciplines. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1191-1208 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.004
  3. Naoum C, Blanke P, Cavalcante JL, Leipsic J. Cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of mitral and tricuspid valve disease: implications for transcatheter interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e005331
  4. Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM, Achenbach S, Moss R, Wheeler M, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1287-1294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.015
  5. Choe J, Koo HJ, Kang JW, Kim JB, Kang HJ, Yang DH. Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement. Sci Rep 2021;11:21005
  6. Lenfant M, Chevallier O, Comby PO, Secco G, Haioun K, Ricolfi F, et al. Deep learning versus iterative reconstruction for CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency setting: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10:558
  7. Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Narita K, Honda Y, Zhou J, et al. Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 2019;29:6163-6171 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06170-3
  8. Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, Nemoto T, Tatsugami F, et al. Deep learning reconstruction at CT: phantom study of the image characteristics. Acad Radiol 2020;27:82-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008
  9. Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, et al. Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2019;29:5322-5329 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06183-y
  10. Hamamura T, Hayashida Y, Takeshita Y, Sugimoto K, Ueda I, Futatsuya K, et al. The usefulness of full-iterative reconstruction algorithm for the visualization of cystic artery on CT angiography. Jpn J Radiol 2019;37:526-533 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-019-00839-x
  11. Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, Fukumoto W, Kaichi Y, Iida M, et al. Coronary artery stent evaluation with model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol 2017;24:975-981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.020
  12. Karlo C, Leschka S, Goetti RP, Feuchtner G, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, et al. High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization. Eur Radiol 2011;21:205-212 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1907-3
  13. Yan C, Zhou G, Yang X, Lu X, Zeng M, Ji M. Image quality of automatic coronary CT angiography reconstruction for patients with HR ≥ 75 bpm using an AI-assisted 16-cm z-coverage CT scanner. BMC Med Imaging 2021;21:24
  14. Weininger M, Barraza JM, Kemper CA, Kalafut JF, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Cardiothoracic CT angiography: current contrast medium delivery strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W260-W272 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5814
  15. Fleischmann D. Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district. Eur J Radiol 2003;45 Suppl 1:S88-S93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00365-0
  16. Ryan R, Abbara S, Colen RR, Arnous S, Quinn M, Cury RC, et al. Cardiac valve disease: spectrum of findings on cardiac 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W294-W303 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2936