Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Guides for the Successful Conduct and Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

  • Seong Ho Park (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2021.12.22
  • Accepted : 2021.12.22
  • Published : 2022.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Ko MJ, Park DA, Kim SH, Ko ES, Shin KH, Lim W, et al. Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:1240-1252  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227
  2. Park SH, Cho SH, Choi SH, Jang JK, Kim MJ, Kim SH, et al. MRI assessment of complete response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer: 2020 guide for practice from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:812-828  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0483
  3. Kim TH, Woo S, Han S, Suh CH, Ghafoor S, Hricak H, et al. The diagnostic performance of the length of tumor capsular contact on MRI for detecting prostate cancer extraprostatic extension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:684-694  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0842
  4. Chung SR, Choi YJ, Suh CH, Lee JH, Baek JH. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting response to chemoradiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:649-661  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0446
  5. Liao XL, Wei JB, Li YQ, Zhong JH, Liao CC, Wei CY. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of locally recurrent prostate cancer: are all pulse sequences helpful? Korean J Radiol 2018;19:1110-1118  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1110
  6. Park HY, Suh CH, Woo S, Kim PH, Kim KW. Quality reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines: results from recently published papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2022;23:355-369  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0808
  7. Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:1175-1187  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1175
  8. Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:1188-1196  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188
  9. Suh CH, Park SH. Successful publication of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:5-6  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.1.5
  10. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529-536  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  11. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14:749-762  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
  12. Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, Ma J, Hooft L, Reitsma JB, et al. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open 2021;11:e048008 
  13. Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Rose S, Shah NH, Ghassemi M, Golub R, et al. A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI. Nat Med 2021;27:1663-1665  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01517-0
  14. Won SY, Park YW, Park M, Ahn SS, Kim J, Lee SK. Quality reporting of radiomics analysis in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a roadmap for moving forward. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:1345-1354  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0715
  15. Park CJ, Park YW, Ahn SS, Kim D, Kim EH, Kang SG, et al. Quality of radiomics research on brain metastasis: a roadmap to promote clinical translation. Korean J Radiol 2022;23:77-88  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0421
  16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71 
  17. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n160 
  18. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 2018;319:388-396  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
  19. Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, Thombs BD, Hyde CJ, Macaskill P, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ 2020;370:m2632 
  20. Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Hooft L, Salameh JP, Korevaar DA, Gatsonis C, et al. Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration. BMJ 2021;372:n265