Acknowledgement
We thank other FDS Team members, and authors and contributors of references cited. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71671179, 51805511, 72001201).
References
- IAEA, Specific Safety Guide, No. SSG-30, Safety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants, 2014.
- NRC, 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors, 2004.
- J. Zhao, J. Tong, X. He, Risk-informed SSC categorization method in nuclear power plant, J. Tsinghua Univ. (Sci. Technol.) 3 (2007).
- V. Patel, P. O'Regan, E. Sweat, In 2012 20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering and the ASME 2012 Power Conference, ICONE 2012-POWER 2012, July 30, 2012 - August 3, 2012.1 Edn 195-205, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)), 2012.
- S. Vasavada, M. Reisi-Fard, 16th International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2019, April 28, 2019 - May 4, 2019. 419-425, American Nuclear Society), 2019.
- D.E. Holcomb, In 9th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC and HMIT 2015, February 22, 2015 - February 26, 2015. 1089-1098, American Nuclear Society), 2015.
- T.R. Kim, Safety classification of systems, structures, and components for pool-type research reactors, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 48 (4) (2016) 1015-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.02.009
- J. Wang, et al., in 14th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2018, September 16, 2018 - September 21, 2018, in: Center for Risk and Reliability; Electric Power Research Institute; et al.; International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (IAPSAM); Lloyd's Register; The B.John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, UCLA Engineering, (International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (IAPSAM)), 2018.
- J. Redd, K. Fleming, A. Afzali, In 14th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2018, September 16, 2018 - September 21, 2018, in: Center for Risk and Reliability; Electric Power Research Institute; et al.; International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (IAPSAM); Lloyd's Register; The B.John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, UCLA Engineering, (International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (IAPSAM)), 2018.
- J.S. Ha, P.H. Seong, A method for risk-informed safety significance categorization using the analytic hierarchy process and Bayesian belief networks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83 (2004) 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2003.08.002
- K. Kim, D.I. Kang, J.E. Yang, On the use of the Balancing Method for calculating component RAW involving CCFs in SSC categorization, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87 (2005) 233-242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.017.
- J. Wang, et al., A new importance assessment method for risk-informed SSC categorization, Int. J. Energy Res. 42 (2018) 1779-1786, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3985.
- S. Lyons, S. Vasavada, ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2018, November 9, 2018 - November 15, 2018, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)), 2018.
- M. Sun, et al., A new integrated SSCs safety classification method and a case study on CN HCCB TES, Ann. Nucl. Energy 145 (2020), 107594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107594
- K.U. Rahman, K. Jin, G. Heo, Risk-informed design of hybrid I&C architectures for research reactors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63 (2016) 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2015.2499779
- J.E. Mateer, R.W. Jones, 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2018, May 31, 2018 - June 2, 2018. 2752-2757, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018.
- S. Martorell, et al., The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 65 (1999) 85-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(98)00088-x.
- S.M. Hoseyni, F. Di Maio, E. Zio, Condition-based probabilistic safety assessment for maintenance decision making regarding a nuclear power plant steam generator undergoing multiple degradation mechanisms, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 191 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106583.
- OECD NEA, NEA/CSNI/R(2004)20, Risk Monitors - the State of the Art in Their Development and Use at Nuclear Power Plants, 2004.
- IAEA, Specific Safety Guide, No. SSG-4, Development and Application of Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, 2010.
- K. Jankala, M. Heliseva, in 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012, June 25, 2012 - June 29, 2012. 3623-3631, International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (IAPSAM)), 2012.
- NEI, NEI 00-04, 10 CFR 50.69 SSC Categorization Guideline, 2003.