Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191510301290).
References
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Power Plant Reactors in the World, Reference Data Series No.2, IAEA, Vienna, 2020.
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Release of Sites from Regulatory Control on Termination of Practices, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. WS-G-5.1, IAEA, Vienna, 2006.
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Criteria for Reuse of Site and Remaining Buildings after Completion of Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, NSSC Notice No.2021-11, 2021. South Korea.
- United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). NUREG-1575, Rev.1, USNRC, Washington, DC, 2000.
- Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Haddam Neck Plant License Termination Plan, Rev.7, 2007. Washington, DC.
- Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee License Termination Plan, Rev.5, 2009. Washington, DC.
- S.B. Hong, D.S. Hwang, B.K. Seo, J.K. Moon, Practical application of the MARSSIM process to the site release of a uranium conversion plant following decommissioning, Ann. Nucl. Energy 65 (2014) 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.018
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Monitoring for Compliance with Decommissioning Termination Survey Criteria, NUREG/CR-2082, 1981.
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination, NUREG/CR-5849, 1992.
- W.R. Ott, A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 40 (1990) 1378-1383, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466789.
- Environmental Protection Agency, The Lognormal Distribution in Environmental Applications. EPA/600/R-97/006, EPA, Washington, DC, 1997.
- W. Sohn, H.-W. Seo, K. Jeong, An approach for determining reasonable sample sizes of MARSSIM final status surveys in decommissioning of nuclear facilities, Ann. Nucl. Energy 131 (2019) 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.04.009
- W. Sohn, M. Jeong, K. Jeong, Theoretical comparative study of t tests and nonparametric tests for final status surveys of MARSSIM at decommissioning sites, Ann. Nucl. Energy 135 (2020) 106945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106945
- W. Sohn, E.-h. Hong, Monte Carlo simulation for verification of nonparametric tests used in final status surveys of MARSSIM at decommissioning of nuclear facilities, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 53 (2021) 1664-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.014
- Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report, IOSB outside Area Class 2 Survey Unit F8300142, 2017.
- Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Haddam Neck Plant Final Status Survey Final Report, Phase VII, 2007.
- Oracle And/or its Affiliate, Oracle Crystal Ball Software User Manual, Version 11.2.4.
- Environmental Protection Agency, Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewer's Guide, EPA QA/G-9R, EPA, Washington, DC, 2006.
- United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual (MARLAP), Part II: Chapter 18-20, Appendix G (Volume III), NUREG-1576, USNRC, Washington, DC, 2004.
- H. Pham, Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics, Springer, 2006.
- C. Lataniotis, E. Torre, S. Marelli, B. Sudret, UQLab user manual - The INPUT module, Report # UQLab-V1.4-102, Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2021.