Acknowledgement
Special thanks to Jihwan Kim, Kun Hee Kim and Woo seok Choi for assistance in data curation.
References
- Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Radiology. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007;120:677-682 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1910
- Ehman EC, Yu L, Manduca A, Hara AK, Shiung MM, Jondal D, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. Radiographics 2014;34:849-862 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.344135128
- Geyer LL, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Nance JW Jr, Bastarrika G, Leipsic JA, et al. State of the art: iterative CT reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2015;276:339-357 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015132766
- Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257:373-383 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092212
- Smith EA, Dillman JR, Goodsitt MM, Christodoulou EG, Keshavarzi N, Strouse PJ. Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. Radiology 2014;270:526-534 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130362
- Willemink MJ, Noel PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol 2019;29:2185-2195 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7
- Solomon J, Samei E. Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. Med Phys 2014;41:091908
- Hong JH, Park EA, Lee W, Ahn C, Kim JH. Incremental image noise reduction in coronary CT angiography using a deep learning-based technique with iterative reconstruction. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:1165-1177 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0020
- Kim JH, Yoon HJ, Lee E, Kim I, Cha YK, Bak SH. Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for low-dose chest computed tomography scan: emphasis on image quality and noise. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:131-138 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0116
- Brady SL, Trout AT, Somasundaram E, Anton CG, Li Y, Dillman JR. Improving image quality and reducing radiation dose for pediatric CT by using deep learning reconstruction. Radiology 2021;298:180-188 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020202317
- Park C, Choo KS, Jung Y, Jeong HS, Hwang JY, Yun MS. CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness. Eur Radiol 2021;31:3156-3164 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07358-8
- Shin YJ, Chang W, Ye JC, Kang E, Oh DY, Lee YJ, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT using a deep learning-based denoising algorithm: a comparison with CT reconstructed with filtered back projection or iterative reconstruction algorithm. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:356-364 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0413
- Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, et al. Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2019;29:5322-5329 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06183-y
- Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. Automated calculation of water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM Task Group 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17:320-333 https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171
- Smith SW. The scientist and engineer's guide to digital signal processing. San Diego: California Technical Pub, 1997
- Nam JG, Hong JH, Kim DS, Oh J, Goo JM. Deep learning reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT of the upper abdomen: similar image quality with lower radiation dose in direct comparison with iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5533-5543 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07712-4
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing, 4th ed. London: Pearson, 2018:272-295
- Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, Fukumoto W, Kaichi Y, Iida M, et al. Coronary artery stent evaluation with model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol 2017;24:975-981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.020
- Suzuki S, Machida H, Tanaka I, Ueno E. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:652-657 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8689
- Jensen CT, Liu X, Tamm EP, Chandler AG, Sun J, Morani AC, et al. Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215:50-57 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22332
- Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 2020;47:3961-3971 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14319
- Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, Barrau C, Pasquier H, Beregi JP, et al. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3951-3959 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w
- Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, Nemoto T, Tatsugami F, et al. Deep learning reconstruction at CT: phantom study of the image characteristics. Acad Radiol 2020;27:82-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008
- Yu L, Vrieze TJ, Leng S, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Technical note: measuring contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution of an iterative reconstruction method in CT using ensemble averaging. Med Phys 2015;42:2261-2267 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4916802