Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea

  • Chang Youl Ko (Department of Accounting, Jeju National University) ;
  • Hoon Jung (Department of Accounting, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2022.04.07
  • Accepted : 2022.05.06
  • Published : 2022.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear. Design/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020. This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model. Findings - The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve. When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms' resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases. Originality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms' R&D stickiness suggest that export firms' managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure long-term competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms' R&D activities.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by the 2022 scientific promotion program by Jeju National University.

References

  1. Aboody, D. and B. Lev (1998), "The Value Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization", Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 161-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491312
  2. An, T., S. Lee and H. Jung (2004), "Asymmetrical Behavior of Manufacturing Costs", Korea Business Review, 33(3), 789-807.
  3. Anderson, M., R. Banker, and S. Janakiraman (2003), "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs Sticky?", Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X. 00095
  4. Anderson, M., R. Banker, R. Huang and S. Janakiraman (2007), "Cost Behavior and Fundamental Analysis of SG&A Cost s", Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 22(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0702200103
  5. Balakrishnan, R., M. J. Petersen and N. S. Soderstrom (2004), "Does Capacity Utilization Affect the "Stickiness" of Cost?", Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 19(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900303
  6. Banker, R., D. Byzalov and L. Chen (2013), "Employment Protection Legislation, Adjustment Costs and Cross-country Differences in Cost Behavior", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003
  7. Bublitz, B. and M. Ettredge (1989), "The Information in Discretionary Outlays; Advertising, Research and Development", The Accounting Review, 64, 108-124.
  8. Bugeja, M., M. Lu, and Y. Shan (2015), "Cost Stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and Determinants", Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12066
  9. Calleja, K., M. Steliaros and D. C. Thomas (2006), "A Note on Cost Stickiness: Some International Comparisons", Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001
  10. Chamber, D., R. Jennings and R. Thompson (1999), Evidence on the Usefulness of "No-discretion" Capitalization and Amortization Rules for Research and Development Cost, Working paper, University of Texas, Austin.
  11. Chen, C., H. Lu and T. Sougiannis (2012), "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs", Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
  12. Cho, S. and S. Park (2013), "Research and Development Expenditures in Accounting: Review and Future Direction", Korean Accounting Review, 38(1), 427-469.
  13. Ciftci, M. and W. M. Cready(2011), "Scale Effects of R&D as Reflected in Earnings and Returns", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.003
  14. Ciftci, M., R. Mashruwala, and D. Weiss (2016), "Implications of Cost Behavior for Analysts' Earnings Forecasts", Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51073
  15. Cooper, R. and R. Kaplan (1998), The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases, and Readings (2nd ed), Prentice Hall.
  16. Govindarajan, V., S. Rajgopal, A. Srivastava and L Enache (2019), "It's Time to Stop Treating R&D as a Discretionary Expenditure", Harvard Business Review 1.
  17. Han, S., Z. Rezaee and L. Tuo (2019), "Is Cost Stickiness Associated with Management Earnings Forecasts?", Asian Review of Accounting, 28(2), 173-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-04-2018-0096
  18. Hirschey, M. (1982), "Intangible Capital Aspects of Advertising and R&D Expenditures", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 30(4), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.2307/2097924
  19. Hong, Y., S. Kim and J. Park (2020), "Does the Cost Stickiness Affect the Stock Price Crash?", Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research, 20(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.31507/KJMAR.2020.8.20.2.1
  20. Jang, S. and T. Baek (2009), "The Effect of Corporate Business Conditions on the Asymmetric Cost Behavior: Roles of Cost Management and Earnings Management", Korean Accounting Review, 34(4), 71-107.
  21. Ji, S., I. S. Kwon and S. B. An (2021), "The Effects of Managerial Attributes on Cost Stickiness: An Empirical Analysis of Korean Exporters and Implications for Start-ups", Journal of Korea Trade, 25(2), 196-219.
  22. Kim, B. (2019), "R&D Cost Stickiness in IT Industry", Global Business Administration Review, 16(4), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2019.16.4.97
  23. Kwon, S., S. Choi, B. Kim and M. Lee (2018), "Asymmetry in R&D Investments of Chaebol Firms", Journal of Taxation and Accounting, 19(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.35850/KJTA.19.2.08
  24. Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis (1996), "The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-Relevance of R&D", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
  25. Li, W., R. Natarajan, Y. Zhao and K. Zheng (2020). "The Effect of Management Control Mechanisms through Risk-taking Incentives on Asymmetric Cost Behavior", Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1-25.
  26. Lin, F. and H. C. Tang (2013). "Exporting and Innovation: Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China (No. 111)", ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration.
  27. Maican, F., M. Orth, M. J. Roberts and V. A. Vuong (2020). "The Dynamic Impact of Exporting on Firm R&D Investment", SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3718898
  28. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2022). 2022 Trade Outlook and Promotion Measures. Available from http://www.motie.go.kr/motie/ne/presse/press2/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_cd_n=81&cate_n=1&bbs_seq_n=165159 (accessed March 31, 2022)
  29. Moon, H. W., C. Ko and H. Jung (2020), "R&D Cost Stickiness: Focused on Digital Firms", Accounting Information Review, 38(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.29189/KAIAAIR.38.1.02
  30. Mun, H. and C. K. Hong (2010), "A Comprehensive Analysis of Asymmetric Cost Behavior and its Inter-Industry Differences", Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 1-38.
  31. Noreen, E. and N. Soderstrom (1994), "Are Overhead Costs Strictly Proportional to Activity? Evidence from Hospital Departments", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90012-4
  32. Oh, H. and S. Choi (2021), "The Role of CEO Ability in Determining R&D Investment Behavior among High Technology Firms in Korea", International Telecommunications Policy Review, 28(1), 79-110. https://doi.org/10.37793/ITPR.28.1.4
  33. Prabowo, R., R. Hooghiemstra and P. Van Veen-Dirks (2018), "State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness", European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659
  34. Scherer, F. (1984). "Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Inter Industry Technology Flows". In Zvi Griliches (Eds.), R&D, patents, and productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 417-464.
  35. Sougiannis, T. (1994), "The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D", The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-69.
  36. Sougiannis, T. (1994), "The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D", The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-69.
  37. Subramaniam, C. and M. L. Weidenmier (2003), Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Costs, TCU Working paper, Available from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.369941
  38. Subramaniam, C. and M. Watson (2016), "Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs", Advances in Management Accounting, 26, 275-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006
  39. Sun, R., K. C. Ho, Y. Gu, and C. C. Chen (2019), "Asymmetric Cost Behavior and Investment in R&D: Evidence from China's Manufacturing Listed Companies", Sustainability, 11. 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061785
  40. Tang, L., Y. Huang, J. Liu, and X. Wan (2020), "Cost Stickiness and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China", Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1787148
  41. Weiss, D. (2010), "Cost Behavior and Analysts' Earnings Forecasts", The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441
  42. Yim, J. (2019). "Exports and Firm Innovation", Korea Trade review, 44(3), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.22659/KTRA.2019.44.3.227
  43. Yoon, Sora (2021), "A Study on Research and Development Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Technology Companies", Korean Management Review 50(3), 861-884 https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2021.50.3.861
  44. Zhang, L., J. Li, and H. Wang (2019), "IPO Over-funding and Cost Stickiness", Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1-16.