Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회지)

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Unusual Presentation of Extensive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Accompanying Invasive Ductal Carcinoma on MRI: A Case Report

침윤성 유방암에 동반된 광범위한 관상피내암의 비전형적 자기공명영상 소견: 증례 보고

  • Yeon Jung Kim (Department of Radiology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital) ;
  • Hyun Kyung Jung (Department of Radiology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital) ;
  • Woogyeong Kim (Department of Pathology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital)
  • 김연정 (인제대학교 해운대백병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 정현경 (인제대학교 해운대백병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김우경 (인제대학교 해운대백병원 병리과)
  • Received : 2021.05.18
  • Accepted : 2021.09.23
  • Published : 2022.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ has increased with the rise in screening mammography; currently, ductal carcinoma in situ constitutes 20%-25% of all breast cancers, and up to half of them may become invasive. Its early detection is critical in improving the cure rate. Moreover, MRI has higher sensitivity for its detection than mammography. Herein, we report an unusual case of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a continuous, serpentine, linear enhancement with regional distribution on MRI.

선별 유방촬영술이 널리 사용됨에 따라 관상피내암의 빈도는 증가해왔다. 뿐만 아니라, 이의 발견에 있어서는 자기공명영상이 유방촬영술보다 더 높은 민감도를 가진다. 이에 저자들은 침윤성 유방암에 동반된 광범위한 범위의 관상피내암의 비정형적인 자기공명영상 소견을 소개하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, Kimijima I, Okumoto T, Seiji K, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 2010;30:1183-1198 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.305095073
  2. Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2005;11:382-390 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00121.x
  3. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X
  4. Recht A, Rutgers EJ, Fentiman IS, Kurtz JM, Mansel RE, Sloane JP. The fourth EORTC DCIS Consensus meeting (Chateau Marquette, Heemskerk, The Netherlands, 23-24 January 1998)--conference report. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1664-1669 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00220-2
  5. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, Bottcher J, Gajda M, Camara O, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2007;31:394-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.04.030
  6. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007;245:684-691 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453062061
  7. Chadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V, Mehta TS, Venkataraman S, Dialani V, et al. Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015:204:219-227 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12656
  8. Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, Ali S, Pantelic MV. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics 2010;30:1673-1687 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.306105510
  9. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA 2000;11:129-137 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678476
  10. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Weyler J, Verslegers I, et al. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast. JBR-BTR 2005;88:225-232