Ocean Systems Engineering

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of nominal wake of a semi-displacement high-speed vessel at full scale

  • Can, Ugur (Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Yildiz Technical University) ;
  • Bal, Sakir (Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Istanbul Technical University)
  • Received : 2021.10.20
  • Accepted : 2022.03.15
  • Published : 2022.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the nominal wake field of a semi-displacement type high-speed vessel was computed at full scale by using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) and GEOSIM-based approaches. A scale effect investigation on nominal wake field of benchmark Athena vessel was performed with two models which have different model lengths. The members of the model family have the same Fr number but different Re numbers. The spatial components of nominal wake field have been analyzed by considering the axial, radial and tangential velocities for models at different scales. A linear feature has been found for radial and tangential components while a nonlinear change has been obtained for axial velocity. Taylor wake fraction formulation was also computed by using the axial wake velocities and an extrapolation technique was carried out to get the nonlinear fit of nominal wake fraction. This provides not only to observe the change of nominal wake fraction versus scale ratios but also to estimate accurately the wake fraction at full-scale. Extrapolated full-scale nominal wake fractions by GEOSIM-based approach were compared with the full-scale CFD result, and a very good agreement was achieved. It can be noted that the GEOSIM-based extrapolation method can be applied for estimation of the nominal wake fraction of semi-displacement type high-speed vessels.

Keywords

References

  1. Beigi, S.M., Shateri, A. and Manshadi, M.D. (2020), "Numerical investigation of the effect of the location of stern planes on submarine wake flow", Ocean Syst. Eng., 10(3), 289-316. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2020.10.3.289.
  2. Bertram, V. (2012), "Resistance and Propulsion", Practical Ship Hydrodynamics, 73-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097150-6.10003-x.
  3. Bhushan, S. et al. (2009), "Model-and full-scale URANS simulations of athena resistance, powering, seakeeping, and 5415 maneuvering", J. Ship Res., 53(4), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2009.53.4.179.
  4. Can, U. and Bal, S. (2022), "Prediction of drag and lift forces of a high-speed vessel at full scale by CFD-based GEOSIM method", Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902211070743.
  5. Can, U., Delen, C. and Bal, S. (2020), "Effective wake estimation of KCS hull at full-scale by GEOSIM method based on CFD", Ocean Eng., 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108052.
  6. Celik, I.B. et al. (2008), "Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications", J. Fluid. Eng. T. ASME, 130(7), 0780011-0780014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953.
  7. Day Jr, W.G., Reed, A.M. and Hurwitz, R.B. (1980), Full-Scale Propeller Disk Wake Survey and Boundary Layer Velocity Profile Measurements on the 154-Foot Ship R/V Athena. DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD SHIP ....
  8. Delen, C. and Bal, S. (2019), "Telfer"s GEOSIM method revisited by CFD", Int. J. Maritime Eng., 161(4), 467-478. https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijme.2019.a4.563.
  9. Delen, C., Can, U. and Bal, S. (2020) "Prediction of resistance and self-propulsion characteristics of a full-scale naval ship by CFD-based GEOSIM method", J. Ship Res., 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.03200022.
  10. Dogrul, A., Song, S. and Demirel, Y.K. (2020), "Scale effect on ship resistance components and form factor", Ocean Eng., 209, 107428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107428.
  11. Duman, S., Sener, B. and Bal, S. (2018), "LCG effects on resistance, lift and trim characteristics of R/V Athena hull", Int. J. Small Craft Technol., 160, 43-56.
  12. Gray-Stephens, A., Tezdogan, T. and Day, S. (2020a), "Experimental measurement of the nearfield longitudinal wake profiles of a high-speed prismatic planing hull", Ship Technol. Res., 68(2), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2020.1836552.
  13. Gray-Stephens, A., Tezdogan, T. and Day, S. (2020b), "Numerical modelling of the nearfield longitudinal wake profiles of a high-speed prismatic planing hull", J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8(7), 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8070516.
  14. Hirt, C.W. and Nichols, B.D. (1981), "Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries", J. Comput. Phys., 39(1), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.
  15. Hurwitz, R.B. and Crook, L.B. (1980), Analysis of Wake Survey Experimental Data for Model 5365 Representing the R/V ATHENA in the DTNSRDC Towing Tank. DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD SHIP ....
  16. ITTC (2011), "Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications", ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines ITTC, 1-8.
  17. Jenkins, D.S. (1984), Resistance Characteristcs of the High Speed Transom Stern Ship R/V Athena in the Bare Hull Condition. Report, David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Bethesda Md, USA.
  18. Kumar, Y.H. and Vijayakumar, R. (2020), "Effect of flap angle on t ransom stern flow of a High speed displacement Surface combatant", Ocean Syst. Eng., 10(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2020.10.1.001.
  19. Ozdemir, Y.H. et al. (2016), "A numerical application to predict the resistance and wave pattern of Kriso container ship", Brodogradnja, 67(2), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.21278/brd67204.
  20. Querard, A., Temarel, P. and Turnock, S.R. (2008), "Omae2008-57 330", Proceedings of the ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.
  21. Ratcliffe, T. et al. (2008), "An Integrated Experimental and Computational Investigation into the Dynamic Loads and Free-surface Wave-Field Perturbations Induced by Head-Sea Regular Waves on a 1/8.25 Scale-Model of the R/V ATHENA", (October), 5-10. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1935.
  22. Roache, P.J. (1998), "Verification of codes and calculations", AIAA J., 36(5).
  23. Savistky, D. and Morabito, M. (2010), "Surface wave contours associated with the forebody wake of stepped planing hulls", Marine Technology and SNAME News, 47(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5957/mtsn.2010.47.1.1.
  24. Stern, F. et al. (2013), "Computational ship hydrodynamics: Nowadays and way forward", Int. Shipbuild. Progress, 60(1-4), 3-105. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-130090.
  25. Sukas, O.F. et al. (2017), "Hydrodynamic assessment of planing hulls using overset grids", Appl. Ocean Res., 65, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.03.015.
  26. Telfer, E.V. (1927), "Ship resistance similarity", T. Roy. Inst. Naval Archit., 93, 174-190.
  27. Wilcox, D.C. (1993), Turbulence modeling for CFD. La Canada, Calif.: DCW Industries.
  28. Yucel Odabasi, A. and Fitzsimmons, P.A. (1978), "Alternative methods for wake quality assessment", Int. Shipbuild.Progress, 25(282), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.3233/isp-1978-2528202.