DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Coal pyrolysis behaviors at supercritical CO2 conditions

  • Hakduck Kim (Graduate School of Convergence for Clean Energy Integrated Power Generation, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeongmin Choi (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Heechang Lim (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Juhun Song (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2021.05.15
  • Accepted : 2022.07.27
  • Published : 2022.12.25

Abstract

In this study, a product gas yield and carbon conversion were measured during the coal pyrolysis. The pyrolysis process occurred under two different atmospheres such as subcritical (45 bar, 10℃) and supercritical CO2 condition (80 bar, 35℃). Under the same pressure (80 bar), the atmosphere temperature increased from 35℃ to 45℃ to further examine temperature effect on the pyrolysis at supercritical CO2 condition. For all three cases, a power input supplied to heating wire placed below coal bed was controlled to make coal bed temperature constant. The phase change of CO2 atmosphere and subsequent pyrolysis behaviors of coal bed were observed using high-resolution camcorder. The pressure and temperature in the reactor were controlled by a CO2 pump and heater. Then, the coal bed was heated by wire heater to proceed the pyrolysis under supercritical CO2 condition.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (20214000000140, Graduate School of Convergence for Clean Energy Integrated Power Generation). The authors also thank for the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2020R1F1A1051343) funded by the Korean Government (MEST).

References

  1. Borgnakke, C. and Sonntag, R.E. (2014), Fundamentals of thermodynamics, John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Cengel, Y.A., Boles, M.A. and Kanoglu, M. (2010), Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, McGraw Hill
  3. Charles Hill and Chris Yurchick (2021), "Coal to carbon fiber - Novel supercritical CO2 solvated process", presented at 2021 NETL Annual Coal Processing Project Review Meeting.
  4. Hariyanto, P., Myint, A.A. and Kim, J.H. (2020), "Ultrafast and complete drying of ecamsule solution using supercritical carbon dioxide with fluctuating pressure technique", J. Supercrit. Fluid., 160, 104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104795.
  5. Iwai, Y., Amiya, M., Murozono, T. and Arai, Y. (1998), "Drying of coals by using supercritical carbon dioxide", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, 2893-2896. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9709493.
  6. Kim, H.D., Choi, J.M., Lim, H.C. and Song, J.H. (2021), "Enhanced combustion processes of liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2)-low rank coal slurry at high pressures", Energy, 237, 121566 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121566.
  7. Kim, H.D., Choi, J.M., Lim, H.C. and Song, J.H. (2022), "Liquid carbon dioxide drying and combustion behavior of high-moisture coal at high pressure", Appl. Therm. Eng., 207, 118182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118182.
  8. Kim, H.D., Lim, H.C. and Song, J.H. (2020), "Effect of liquid carbon dioxide on coal pyrolysis and gasification behavior at subcritical pressure conditions", Chem. Eng. Sci., 231, 116292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.116292.
  9. Lemmon, E., Huber, M.L. and McLinden, M.O. (2007), NIST Standard reference database 23, Reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties - REFPROP, Version 8.0.
  10. Samanta, S. and Ghosh, S. (2015), "A techno-economic analysis of partial repowering of a 210 MW coal fired power plant", Adv. Energ. Res., 3, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eri.2015.3.3.167.
  11. Song, Y., Zou, Q., Su, E., Zhang, Y. and Sun, Y. (2020), "Changes in the microstructure of low-rank coal after supercritical CO2 and water treatment", Fuel, 279, 118493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118493.
  12. Zhang, D., Gu, L., Li, S., Lian, P. and Tao, J. (2013), "Interactions of Supercritical CO2 with Coal", Energ. Fuel., 27, 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301191p.