DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of inland waters on highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in neighboring poultry farms in South Korea

  • Ahmad, Saleem (Veterinary Public Health Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Koh, Kyeyoung (Veterinary Public Health Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yoo, Daesung (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Suh, Gukhyun (Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and BK21 FOUR Program, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaeil (Veterinary Public Health Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Min (Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and BK21 FOUR Program, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2021.10.28
  • Accepted : 2022.01.20
  • Published : 2022.05.31

Abstract

Background: Since 2003, the H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) subtype has caused massive economic losses in the poultry industry in South Korea. The role of inland water bodies in avian influenza (AI) outbreaks has not been investigated. Identifying water bodies that facilitate risk pathways leading to the incursion of the HPAI virus (HPAIV) into poultry farms is essential for implementing specific precautionary measures to prevent viral transmission. Objectives: This matched case-control study (1:4) examined whether inland waters were associated with a higher risk of AI outbreaks in the neighboring poultry farms. Methods: Rivers, irrigation canals, lakes, and ponds were considered inland water bodies. The cases and controls were chosen based on the matching criteria. The nearest possible farms located within a radius of 3 km of the case farms were chosen as the control farms. The poultry farms were selected randomly, and two HPAI epidemics (H5N8 [2014-2016] and H5N6 [2016-2017]) were studied. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that inland waters near poultry farms were significant risk factors for AI outbreaks. The study speculated that freely wandering wild waterfowl and small animals contaminate areas surrounding poultry farms. Conclusions: Pet birds and animals raised alongside poultry birds on farm premises may wander easily to nearby waters, potentially increasing the risk of AI infection in poultry farms. Mechanical transmission of the AI virus occurs when poultry farm workers or visitors come into contact with infected water bodies or their surroundings. To prevent AI outbreaks in the future, poultry farms should adopt strict precautions to avoid contact with nearby water bodies and their surroundings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank all the members of the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Korea for providing the data to perform the work. The cooperation of poultry farms workers in collecting additional information is also appreciated.

References

  1. Gharieb R, Mohamed M, Khalil A, Ali A. Influenza A viruses in birds and humans: Prevalence, molecular characterization, zoonotic significance and risk factors' assessment in poultry farms. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;63:51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2019.01.001
  2. Chatziprodromidou IP, Arvanitidou M, Guitian J, Apostolou T, Vantarakis G, Vantarakis A. Global avian influenza outbreaks 2010-2016: a systematic review of their distribution, avian species and virus subtype. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0691-z
  3. Tahir MF, Abbas MA, Ghafoor T, Dil S, Shahid MA, Bullo MM, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of avian influenza H9 virus among poultry professionals in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12(4):482-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2018.11.009
  4. Bouwstra R, Gonzales JL, de Wit S, Stahl J, Fouchier RA, Elbers AR. Risk for low pathogenicity avian influenza virus on poultry farms, the Netherlands, 2007-2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(9):1510-1516. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2309.170276
  5. Mo IP, Bae YJ, Lee SB, Mo JS, Oh KH, Shin JH, et al. Review of avian influenza outbreaks in South Korea from 1996 to 2014. Avian Dis. 2016;60(1 Suppl):172-177. https://doi.org/10.1637/11095-041715-Review
  6. Yoon H, Moon OK, Jeong W, Choi J, Kang YM, Ahn HY, et al. H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza in the Republic of Korea: epidemiology during the first wave, from January through July 2014. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2015;6(2):106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2015.01.005
  7. Jeong J, Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Kwon YK, Kim HR, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N8) in domestic poultry and its relationship with migratory birds in South Korea during 2014. Vet Microbiol. 2014;173(3-4):249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.002
  8. Kwon JH, Lee DH, Jeong JH, Yuk SS, Erdene-Ochir TO, Noh JY, et al. Isolation of an H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strain from wild birds in Seoul, a highly urbanized area in South Korea. J Wildl Dis. 2017;53(3):630-635. https://doi.org/10.7589/2016-07-161
  9. Lee EK, Lee YN, Kye SJ, Lewis NS, Brown IH, Sagong M, et al. Characterization of a novel reassortant H5N6 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus clade 2.3.4.4 in Korea, 2017. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):103.
  10. Aditama TY, Samaan G, Kusriastuti R, Sampurno OD, Purba W, Misriyah , et al. Avian influenza H5N1 transmission in households, Indonesia. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029971
  11. Chaudhry M, Rashid HB, Angot A, Thrusfield M, Bronsvoort BM, Capua I, et al. Risk factors for avian influenza H9 Infection of chickens in live bird retail stalls of Lahore district, Pakistan 2009-2010. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23895-1
  12. Wang XX, Cheng W, Yu Z, Liu SL, Mao HY, Chen EF. Risk factors for avian influenza virus in backyard poultry flocks and environments in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0445-0
  13. Guinat C, Artois J, Bronner A, Guerin JL, Gilbert M, Paul MC. Duck production systems and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 in France, 2016-2017. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42607-x
  14. Gompo TR, Shah BR, Karki S, Koirala P, Maharjan M, Bhatt DD. Risk factors associated with avian influenza subtype H9 outbreaks in poultry farms in Kathmandu valley, Nepal. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0223550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223550
  15. Achenbach JE, Bowen RA. Transmission of avian influenza A viruses among species in an artificial barnyard. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017643
  16. Li X, Cui P, Zeng X, Jiang Y, Li Y, Yang J, et al. Characterization of avian influenza H5N3 reassortants isolated from migratory waterfowl and domestic ducks in China from 2015 to 2018. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(6):2605-2610. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13324
  17. Germeraad EA, Elbers AR, de Bruijn ND, Heutink R, van Voorst W, Hakze-van der Honing R, et al. Detection of low pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H10N7 in poultry and environmental water samples during a clinical outbreak in commercial free-range layers, Netherlands 2017. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00237
  18. Ryu S, Lim JS, Cowling BJ, Chun BC. Low risk of avian influenza A (H5N6) transmission to depopulation workers in Korea. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2018;12(3):412-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12530
  19. Kim WH, Bae SH, Cho S. Spatiotemporal dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N8 in poultry farms, South Korea. Viruses. 2021;13(2):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020274
  20. Yoo DS, Chun B, Min KD, Lim JS, Moon OK, Lee KN. Elucidating the local transmission dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N6 in the Republic of Korea by integrating phylogenetic information. Pathogens. 2021;10(6):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060691
  21. Kim WH, An JU, Kim J, Moon OK, Bae SH, Bender JB, et al. Risk factors associated with highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N8 outbreaks on broiler duck farms in South Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(5):1329-1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12882
  22. Kang MS, Choi SH, Koh IS. The effect of increasing control-to-case ratio on statistical power in a simulated case-control SNP association study. Genomics Inform. 2009;7(3):148-151. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2009.7.3.148
  23. Therneau T. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R Package Version 3.1-12. New York: Springer; 2020.
  24. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
  25. Andrade C. The P value and statistical significance: misunderstandings, explanations, challenges, and alternatives. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(3):210-215. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_193_19
  26. Hwang HS, Yang JC, Oh SH, Lee YM, Chang KS. A study on the flora of 15 islands in the western sea of Jeollanamdo province, Korea. J Asia Pac Biodivers. 2013;6(2):281-310. https://doi.org/10.7229/jkn.2013.6.2.281
  27. Papp Z, Clark RG, Parmley EJ, Leighton FA, Waldner C, Soos C. The ecology of avian influenza viruses in wild dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) in Canada. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176297
  28. Prosser DJ, Palm EC, Takekawa JY, Zhao D, Xiao X, Li P, et al. Movement analysis of free-grazing domestic ducks in Poyang Lake, China: a disease connection. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2016;30(5):869-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1065496
  29. Lee K, Yu D, Martinez-Lopez B, Yoon H, Kang SI, Hong SK, et al. Fine-scale tracking of wild waterfowl and their impact on highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in the Republic of Korea, 2014-2015. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75698-y
  30. van Dijk JGB, Kleyheeg E, Soons MB, Nolet BA, Fouchier RAM, Klaassen M. Weak negative associations between avian influenza virus infection and movement behaviour in a key host species, the mallard Anas platyrhynchos. Oikos. 2015;124(10):1293-1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01836
  31. Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Jeong J, Choi JG, Jeong J, et al. Novel reassortant influenza A(H5N8) viruses among inoculated domestic and wild ducks, South Korea, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):298-304. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2102.141268
  32. Mihai ME, Tecu C, Ivanciuc AE, Necula G, Lupulescu E, Onu A. Survival of H5N1 influenza virus in water and its inactivation by chemical methods. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2011;70(2):78-84.
  33. Pinon A, Vialette M. Survival of viruses in water. Intervirology. 2018;61(5):214-222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484899
  34. Song BM, Lee EK, Lee YN, Heo GB, Lee HS, Lee YJ. Phylogeographical characterization of H5N8 viruses isolated from poultry and wild birds during 2014-2016 in South Korea. J Vet Sci. 2017;18(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2017.18.1.89
  35. Hinshaw VS, Webster RG, Turner B. Water-bone transmission of influenza A viruses? Intervirology. 1979;11(1):66-68. https://doi.org/10.1159/000149014
  36. Fujimoto Y, Usui T, Ito H, Ono E, Ito T. Susceptibility of wild passerines to subtype H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Avian Pathol. 2015;44(4):243-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2015.1043235
  37. Butler D. Can cats spread avian flu? Nature. 2006;440(7081):135-136. https://doi.org/10.1038/440135a
  38. Shimizu Y, Hayama Y, Yamamoto T, Murai K, Tsutsui T. Matched case-control study of the influence of inland waters surrounding poultry farms on avian influenza outbreaks in Japan. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21695-1
  39. Velkers FC, Blokhuis SJ, Veldhuis Kroeze EJ, Burt SA. The role of rodents in avian influenza outbreaks in poultry farms: a review. Vet Q. 2017;37(1):182-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2017.1325537
  40. Fang LQ, de Vlas SJ, Liang S, Looman CW, Gong P, Xu B, et al. Environmental factors contributing to the spread of H5N1 avian influenza in mainland China. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002268