DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Metaverse Presence on Intention to Share Knowledge Through Intrinsic Motivation of Employees: Moderating Effect of Digital Technological Competence

메타버스 실재감이 조직원의 내적 동기를 통해 지식공유 의도에 미치는 영향: 디지털 기술 역량의 조절 효과

  • Received : 2022.02.08
  • Accepted : 2022.03.10
  • Published : 2022.05.28

Abstract

Covid-19 calls for minimizing gatherings of people in spaces such as offices. Organizations are encouraging information-sharing activities among employees by using online platform technology. Recently, Organizations are supporting their work using the metaverse. This study confirms the effect of metaverse presence on the intention to share knowledge by forming the intrinsic motivation of the employees and the moderating effect of the individual's digital technological competence. We presented research hypotheses through previous studies such as virtual reality and tested the hypotheses using 309 samples obtained through surveys. As a result, the social, tele, and self presence of the metaverse increased organizational-related intrinsic motivation(organizational identification, value congruence) and had a positive effect on the intention to share knowledge. In addition, digital technological competence moderated the relationship between value congruence and intention to share knowledge. This study suggests the importance of strategies to enhance the presence of metaverse for organizations to increase work productivity by using metaverse and the need to support individual digital competence reinforcement.

코비드-19는 사무실 등 특정 공간 내에 사람들의 모임을 최소화할 것을 요구하고 있다. 조직들은 네트워크를 지원하는 온라인 플랫폼 기술을 활용하여, 조직원 간의 정보공유 활동을 장려하고 있다. 최근, 메타버스 플랫폼이 보유한 공간, 경험 등의 실재감 요소가 교환 행동에 도움이 될 수 있다는 관점이 제시되면서, 조직들은 메타버스를 활용한 업무 지원 수준을 높이고 있다. 본 연구는 메타버스 실재감이 조직원의 내적 동기 형성을 통해 지식공유 의도에 미치는 영향과 개인의 디지털 기술 역량의 차이에 의해 지식공유 의도 차이가 존재할 수 있음을 확인하고자 한다. 연구는 가상 현실 등 선행연구를 통해 연구가설을 제시하였으며, 서베이를 통해 확보한 309개 표본을 활용하여 가설 검증을 하였다. 결과는 메타버스의 사회적, 원격, 자기 실재감이 조직 관련 내적 동기(조직 동일시, 가치 일치)를 높여 지식공유 의도에 긍정적 영향을 주었다. 또한, 디지털 기술 역량이 가치 일치와 지식공유 의도 간의 관계를 조절하였다. 본 연구는 메타버스를 활용하여 업무 생산성을 높이고자 하는 조직에 있어 메타버스 실재감 강화의 중요성과 개인의 디지털 역량 강화 지원의 필요성을 제언한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(NRF-2020S1A5A8040463)

References

  1. H. Lee, "Expanded Role of Empathy in Metaverse Environment Where AI is Applied," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.21, No.11, pp.87-99, 2021. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.11.087.
  2. CNBC, Here's How Zuckerberg Thinks Facebook Will Profit by Building a 'Metaverse', 2021. 07. 29. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com.
  3. J. Oh, "A Study on Factors Affecting the Intention to Use the Metaverse by Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model(ETAM): Focused on the Virtual World Metaverse," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.21, No.10, pp. 204-216, 2021. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.10.204.
  4. Emergen Research, Metaverse Market, By Component (Hardware, Software), By Platform (Desktop, Mobile), By Offerings (Virtual Platforms, Asset Marketplaces, and Others) By Technology (Blockchain, VR & AR, Mixed Reality), By Application, By End-use, and By Region Forecast to 2028, 2021.
  5. J. K. Gibbs, M. Gillies, and X. Pan, "A Comparison of the Effects of Haptic and Visual Feedback on Presence in Virtual Reality," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.157, pp.102717, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102717.
  6. D. A. Z. Gonzalez, D. Richards, and A. A. Bilgin, "Making It Real: A Study of Augmented Virtuality on Presence and Enhanced Benefits of Study Stress Reduction Sessions," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.147, pp.102579, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102579.
  7. Y. J. Lin and H. C. Wang, "Using Virtual Reality to Facilitate Learners' Creative Self-efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation in an EFL Classroom," Education and Information Technologies, Vol.26, No.4, pp.4487-4505, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10472-9.
  8. G. Makransky and G. B. Petersen, "Investigating the Process of Learning with Desktop Virtual Reality: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Computers & Education, Vol.134, pp.15-30, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002.
  9. Y. Zhao, A. Wang, and Y. Sun, "Technological Environment, Virtual Experience, and MOOC Continuance: A Stimulus-Organism-Response Perspective," Computers & Education, Vol.144, pp.103721, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721.
  10. S. L. Han, M. An, J. J. Han, and J. Lee, "Telepresence, Time Distortion, and Consumer Traits of Virtual Reality Shopping," Journal of Business Research, Vol.118, pp.311-320, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.056.
  11. T. Mancini, C. Imperato, and F. Sibilla, "Does Avatar's Character and Emotional Bond Expose to Gaming Addiction? Two Studies on Virtual Self Discrepancy, Avatar Identification and Gaming Addiction in Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game Players," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.92, pp.297-305, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.007.
  12. A. P. Schouten, T. C. Portegies, I. Withuis, L. M. Willemsen, and K. Mazerant-Dubois, "Robomorphism: Examining the Effects of Telepresence Robots on between Student Cooperation," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.126, pp.106980, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106980.
  13. N. Tunk and A. A. Kumar, "Work from Home: A New Virtual Reality," Current Psychology, Advanced online publication, pp.1-13, 2022. DOI: 0.1007/s12144-021-02660-0.
  14. G. Makransky, L. Lilleholt, and A. Aaby, "Development and Validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory Approach," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.72, pp.276-285, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.066
  15. J. Smart, J. Casscio, and J. Paffendorf, Metaverse Roadmap Overview: Pathways to the 3D Web, 2007. Retrieved https://www.metaverseroadmap.org.
  16. I. Arpaci, M. Al-Emran, and M. A. Al-Sharafi, "The Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on the Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by Engineering Students: A Cross-Cultural comparison, Telematics and Informatics, Vol.54, pp.101468, 2020. DOI : 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101468.
  17. S. H. Liao and C. C. Wu, "System Perspective of Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Innovation, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.2, pp.1096-1103, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109.
  18. I. Hwang, "A study on the Influence of Enterprise Content Management System Success Factors and Task Characteristics on Intention to Use," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.21, No.11, pp.333-349, 2021. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.11.333.
  19. G. W. Bock, R. W. Zmud, Y. G. Kim, and J. N. Lee, "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp.87-111, 2005. DOI : 10.2307/25148669.
  20. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.22, No.14, pp.1111-1132, 1992. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.
  21. C. C. Pinder, Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
  22. K. D. Elsbach, An Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. In Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 21: 163-200. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1999.
  23. P. W. Fombelle, C. B. Jarvis, J. Ward, and L. Ostrom, "Leveraging Customers' Multiple Identities: Identity Synergy as a Driver of Organizational Identification," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.40, No.4, pp,587-604, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-011-0254-5.
  24. J. A. Chatman, "Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person Organization Fit," Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.3, pp.333-349, 1989. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4279063.
  25. J. R. Edwards and D. M. Cable, "The Value of Value Congruence," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.94, No.3, pp. 654-677, 2009. DOI: 10.1037/a0014891.
  26. T. R. Tyler and S. L. Blader, "Can Businesses Effectively Regulate Employee Conduct? The Antecedents of Rule Following in Work Settings," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.48, No.6, pp.1143-1158, 2005. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2005.19573114.
  27. R. Li, Y. Lu, J. Ma, and W. Wang, "Examining Gifting Behavior on Live Streaming Platforms: An Identity Based Motivation Model," Information & Management, Vol.58, No.6, pp.103406, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103406.
  28. B. Haobin Ye, L. H. N. Fong, and J. M. Luo, "Parasocial Interaction on Tourism Companies' Social Media Sites: Antecedents and Consequences," Current Issues in Tourism, Vol.24, No.8, pp.1093-1108, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1764915.
  29. M. J. Kim, C. M. Hall, and D. K. Kim, "Why Do Investors Participate in Tourism Incentive Crowdfunding? The Effects of Attribution and Trust on Willingness to Fund," Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol.37, No.2, pp.141-154, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2020.1722784.
  30. K. K. Lee, "Presence, Explicated," Communication Theory, Vol.14, No.1, pp.27-50, 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x.
  31. R. Hooi and H. Cho, "Avatar Driven Self Disclosure: The Virtual Me is the Actual Me," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.39, pp.20-28, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.019.
  32. M. Barreda-Angeles and T. Hartmann, "Psychological Benefits of Using Social Virtual Reality Platforms During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Role of Social and Spatial Presence," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.127, pp.107047, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107047.
  33. R. Hooi and H. Cho, "Virtual World Continuance Intention," Telematics and Informatics, Vol.34, No.8, pp.1454-1464, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.009.
  34. S. Choi and J. Won, "The Effects of Device on Virtual Reality based Education: Focused on Immersion, Social Consciousness, and Learning Motivation," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.18, No.1, pp.487-492, 2017. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.01.487
  35. A. Calvani, A. Cartelli, A. Fini, and M. Ranieri, "Models and Instruments for Assessing Digital Competence at School," Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, Vol.4, No.3, pp.183-193, 2008.
  36. A. Szwajlik, "Identification and Verification of the Key Methodology Elements of Measuring Digital Competences of ICT Companies' Customers," Procedia Computer Science, Vol.192, pp.3848-3855, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.159.
  37. L. Kim and Y. Choi, "A Study on the Effect of Digital Participation of Local Residents on Subjective Well-being: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Digital Literacy," The Korean Association for Local Government Studies, Vol.24, No.3, pp.253-281, 2020. DOI: 10.20484/klog.24.3.12.
  38. J. Choi and H. Lee, "The Effect of Job Characteristics on Innovative Behavior of HR Employees: The Mediating Effect of Digital Literacy," DAEHAN Association of Business Administration, Vol.32, No.7, pp.1219-1246, 2019. DOI: 10.18032/kaaba.2019.32.7.1219
  39. M. Kim, "The Effects of Computer Literarcy on Job Performance Ability and Job Satisfaction of Office Professonals," Journal of Secretarial Studies, Vol.16, No.2, pp.27-42, 2007.
  40. F. Guay, A. K. Boggiano, and R. J. Vallerand, "Autonomy Support, Intrinsic Motivation, and Perceived Competence: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.27, No.6, pp. 643-650, 2001. DOI: 10.1177/0146167201276001.
  41. J. Kim and M. Moon, "A Study on the Effects of Government Trust and Government Capacity on the Risk Perception of the Fourth Industrial Technology: Exploring the Moderating Role of Digital Literacy," Journal of Korean Associastion for Regional Information Society, Vol.24, No.3, pp.43-72, 2021.
  42. Y. Choi, "A Study on the Effect of Digital Technology Acceptance on the Life Satisfaction of Urban Residents in the Era of Covid 19: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Digital Literacy," Journal of Local Government Studies, Vol.33, No.3, pp.187-219, 2021. DOI: 10.21026/jlgs.2021.33.3.187.
  43. H. Li, J. Zhang, and R. Sarathy, "Understanding Compliance with Internet Use Policy from the Perspective of Rational Choice Theory," Decision Support Systems, Vol.48, No.4, pp.635-645, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.005.
  44. J. Y. Son, "Out of Fear or Desire? Toward a Better Understanding of Employees' Motivation to Follow IS Security Policies," Information & Management, Vol.48, No.7, pp.296-302, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2011.07.002.
  45. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  46. B. H. Wixom and H. J. Watson, "An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success," MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp.17-41, 2001. DOI : 10.2307/3250957.
  47. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.1, pp.39-50, 1981. DOI: 10.2307/3151312.
  48. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.88, No.5, pp.879-903, 2003. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  49. G. C. Lin, Z. Wen, H. W. Marsh, and H. S. Lin, "Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions: Clarification of Orthogonalizing and Double-mean-centering Strategies," Structural Equation Modeling, Vol.17, No.3, pp.374-391, 2010. DOI : 10.1080/10705511.2010.488999.