DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physical Therapy Status and Job Satisfaction of Physical Therapist in Residential Facilities for the Disabled

장애인 거주시설 물리치료사의 직무 만족도와 물리치료 실태

  • Roh, Hyo-Lyun (Department of Physical Therapy, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2021.12.25
  • Accepted : 2022.03.21
  • Published : 2022.05.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the actual condition of physical therapy in residential facilities for the disabled and determined the degree of job satisfaction of physical therapists. METHODS: In this study, data were collected using a structured questionnaire targeting 117 physical therapists (male: 49, female: 68) working in residential facilities for the disabled. The questionnaire consisted of 21 items, including six general characteristics, one job satisfaction, and 14 actual situation-related items. RESULTS: The job satisfaction of the physical therapists working in residential facilities for the disabled was 3.81 ± .83, which was between 'normal' and 'satisfactory'. One physical therapist worked in 91.5% of places. The physical therapy room was used only by the physical therapist, occupational therapist or speech therapist, and a nurse and other departments in 65.8%, 9.4%, and 23.1% of cases. On average, six to 10 patients per day were treated the most with 45.3%, followed by physical therapy alone at 19.7%, and work related to medical rehabilitation and other departments at 72.7%. A higher number of overtime hours and nurses resulted in lower job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The job satisfaction of physical therapists working in residential facilities for the disabled was similar to those of physical therapists working in medical institutions, but the factors affecting the job satisfaction were different. Professionalism in physical therapy was not secured, and the relationships with colleagues were an important factor in increasing job satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. National Law Information Center. Act on medical technicians, Etc. 2021.
  2. National Law Information Center. National sports promotion act. 2021.
  3. National Law Information Center. Elderly welfare act. 2021.
  4. Yang NJ. The changes of social welfare services in korea. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2010;62(4): 79-102. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2010.62.4.004
  5. Lim KS, Ha TY. The factor analysis for the improvement of community enterprises organizational performance and sustainability. Journal of Daehan Academy Of Management Information Systems. 2014;33(2):241-61.
  6. Choe BD, Lee DH, Yoon SD. A multi-item measurement scale of healthcare servicequality: an evaluation indicators of healthcare certification. JKSQM. 2012; 40(3):381-93.
  7. Jang WJ, Park DH, Yoo KH. A study korean journal of social welfare. Korean Local Government Law Association. 2010;26(10):1-28.
  8. Kang CH, Hur YH, Chang IS. A study of the relationship between human resource management & financial resource management and service qualityin social service organizations. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2015;67(4):51-77. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2015.67.4.003
  9. Shin YK, Lee CW. Organizational behavior (2nd). Korea. Hankyungsa, 2021.
  10. Park HH, Park KS, Yom YH, et al. Impact of clinical nurses' power and empowerment on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. JKAN. 2006;36(2): 244-54.
  11. Kirkman BL, Shapito DL. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work team: the mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44(3):557-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069370
  12. Lee KS, Lee WH, Yun MJ. Relationship between musculoskeletal pain and job satisfaction of the physical therapists in elderly care facilities. The Korean Journal of Health Service Management. 2012;6(4):49-60. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2012.6.4.049
  13. National Law Information Center. Disabled person welfare act. 2021.
  14. Parliamentary Legislative Investigation Office. Improvement plans for the miniaturization of residential facilities for the disabled. Current Issues Report 303. 2017.
  15. Segye Ilbo. http://www.segye.com/newsView/20111003003081.
  16. Ministry of health and eelfare, press reference. https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=548&CONT_SEQ=262317. 2011.
  17. Kwon MJ. A survey of evidence-based practice of physical therapist, J Korean Soc Phys Thera. 2006; 18(3):23-36.
  18. Ministry of Health and Welfare Notice No. 2010-31. http://www.mohw.go.kr/upload/viewer/skin/doc.html?fn=1275035267446_20100528172747.xls&rs=/upload/viewer/result/202112/. 2010.
  19. Hwang SS, Kim MJ, Jeon BS. Survey on the current status of orthopedic manual physical therapy in south korea. J Korean Ortho Manual Phys Thera. 2021;27(1):41-9.
  20. Groeneweg R, Kropman H, Huco Leopold H, et al. Manual therapy compared with physical therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies. 2017;12(1):1-12.
  21. Park SW. The Effect of Empowerment on Job Satisfaction for Physical Therapists in General Hospitals. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2018;13(2):115-27. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2018.13.2.115
  22. Jeong SH, Ro HL. The convergence factors of turnover and effect of job satisfaction of physical therapists in residential facility for the disabled on job commitment. J Kor Convergen Soc. 2021;13(1):131-9.