DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerodynamic behavior of supertall buildings with three-fold rotational symmetric plan shapes: A case study

  • 투고 : 2021.08.26
  • 심사 : 2022.02.22
  • 발행 : 2022.05.25

초록

Many factors should be considered by architects and designers for designing a tall building. Wind load is one of these important factors that govern the design of tall building structures and can become a serious challenge when buildings tend to be built very tall and slender. On the other hand, through the initial stages of a design process, choosing the design geometry greatly affects the wind-induced forces on a tall building. With this respect, geometric shapes with 3-fold rotational symmetry are one of the applied plan shapes in tall buildings. This study, therefore, aims to investigate the aerodynamic characteristics of 8 different geometrical shapes using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) by measuring the drag and lift forces. A case study approach was conducted in which different building shape models have the same total gross area and the same height of 300 meters. The simulation was an incompressible transient flow that ran 1700 timesteps (85 seconds on the real-time scale). The results show a great difference between wind-induced force performance of buildings with different plan shapes. Generally, it is stated that the shapes with the same area, but with smaller perimeters, are better choices for reducing the drag force on buildings. Applying the lift force, the results show that the buildings with plan shapes that have rounded corners act better in crosswind flow while, those with sharp corners induce larger forces in the same direction. This study delivers more analytical understanding of building shapes and their behavior against the wind force through the parametric modelling.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abu-Zidan, Y., Mendis, P. and Gunawardena, T. (2020), "Impact of atmospheric boundary layer inhomogeneity in CFD simulations of tall buildings", Heliyon, 6(7), e04274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04274.
  2. Alaghmandan, M., Bahrami, P. and Elnimeiri, M. (2014), "The future trend of architectural form and structural system in high-rise buildings", Architect. Res., 4(3), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20140403.01.
  3. Amin, J.A. and A.K. Ahuja (2010), "Aerodynamic modifications to the shape of the buildings: A review of the state-of-the-art.", Asian J. Civil Eng., (Build. Housing), 11(4).
  4. Autodesk (2020), Meshing, San Rafael, USA. https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/cfd/learnexplore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2019/ENU/SimCFDUsersGuide/files/GUID-BE8C3B02-3613-4237-AD18-033FE3002C34-htm.html.
  5. Bairagi A.K. and Dalui, S.K. (2020), "Prediction of pressure coefficient on setback building by artificial neural network", Canadian J. Civil Eng., 48(10), 1364-1385. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0100.
  6. Bairagi, A.K. and Dalui, S.K. (2020), "Wind environment around the setback building models", Build. Simulat., 14, 1525-1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0758-3.
  7. Bandi, E.K., Tamura, Y., Yoshida, A., Kim, Y.C. and Yang, Q. (2013), "Experimental investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of various triangular-section high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 122, 60-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.002.
  8. Bernardini, E., Spence, S.M., Wei, D. and Kareem, A. (2015), "Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: A CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 144, 154-164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.011.
  9. Boonyapinyo, V. and Wangkansirikun, P. (2016), "Aerodynamic modifications of high-rise buildings for wind load and response reductions", In The 2016 international conference on advances in wind and structures (AWAS16).
  10. Chakraborty, S., Dalui, S.K. and Ahuja, A.K. (2014), "Wind load on irregular plan shaped tall building-a case study", Wind Struct, 19(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.19.1.059.
  11. Daemei, A.B., Khotbehsara, E.M., Nobarani, E.M. and Bahrami, P. (2019), "Study on wind aerodynamic and flow characteristics of triangular-shaped tall buildings and CFD simulation in order to assess drag coefficient", Ain Shams Eng. J., 10(3), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.08.008.
  12. Elnimeiri, M. and Mahsa N. (2011), "A design optimization workflow for tall buildings using parametric algorithm", CTBUH Conference, Seoul, October.
  13. Elshaer, A., Bitsuamlak, G. and El Damatty, A. (2015), "Aerodynamic shape optimization for corners of tall buildings using CFD", In 14th International Conference on Wind Engineering.
  14. Elshaer, A., Gairola, A., Adamek, K. and Bitsuamlak, G. (2017), "Variations in wind load on tall buildings due to urban development", Sustain. Cities Soc., 34, 264-277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.008.
  15. Farouk, M.I. (2016), "Check the comfort of occupants in high rise building using CFD", Ain Shams Eng. J., 7(3), 953-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.06.011.
  16. Hoseinzadeh, S., Bahrami, A., Mirhosseini, S.M., Sohani, A. and Heyns, S. (2020), "A detailed experimental airfoil performance investigation using an equipped wind tunnel", Flow Measure. Instrument., 72, 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101717.
  17. Jafari, M. and Alipour, A. (2021), "Methodologies to mitigate wind-induced vibration of tall buildings: A state-of-the-art review", J. Build. Eng., 33, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101582.
  18. Lin, N., Letchford, C., Tamura, Y., Liang, B. and Nakamura, O. (2005), "Characteristics of wind forces acting on tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93(3), 217-242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.12.001.
  19. Lin, N., Letchford, C., Tamura, Y., Liang, B. and Nakamura, O. (2005), "Characteristics of wind forces acting on tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93(3), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.12.001.
  20. Mashalkar, B.S., Patil, G.R. and Jadhav, A.S. (2015), "Effect of plan shapes on the response of buildings subjected to wind vibrations", IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng., 2278-1684.
  21. Meng, F.Q., He, B.J., Zhu, J., Zhao, D.X., Darko, A. and Zhao, Z. Q. (2018), "Sensitivity analysis of wind pressure coefficients on CAARC standard tall buildings in CFD simulations", J. Build. Eng., 16, 146-158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.004.
  22. Mittal, H., Sharma, A. and Gairola, A. (2019), "Numerical simulation of pedestrian level wind flow around buildings: Effect of corner modification and orientation", J. Build. Eng., 22, 314-326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.014.
  23. Mooneghi, M.A. and Kargarmoakhar, R. (2016), "Aerodynamic mitigation and shape optimization of buildings", J. Build. Eng., 6, 225-235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.01.009.
  24. Mukherjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Dalui, S.K. and Ahuja, A.K. (2014), "Wind induced pressure on'Y'plan shape tall building", Wind Struct., 19(5), 523-540. https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2014.19.5.523.
  25. Poulos, H.G. (2017), Tall Building Foundation Design, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  26. Roy, K. and Bairagi, A.K. (2016), "Wind pressure and velocity around stepped unsymmetrical plan shape tall building using CFD simulation - A case study", Asian J. Civil Eng. Build. Housing, 17(8).
  27. Roy, K.A., Singh, J., Sharma, S.K. and Verma S.K. (2018), "Wind pressure variation on pyramidal roof of rectangular and pentagonal plan low-rise building through CFD simulation", International Conference on Advances in Construction Materials and Structures (ACMS), Uttarakhand, March.
  28. Sanyal, P. and Sujit, K.D. (2020), "Comparison of aerodynamic coefficients of various types of Y-plan-shaped tall buildings", Asian J. Civil Eng., 21(7), 1109-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00265-9.
  29. Sevalia, J.K., Desai, A.K. and Vasanwala, S.A. (2012), "Effect of geometric plan configuration of tall building on wind force coefficient using CFD", Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Studies, 127-130.
  30. Singh, J. and Roy, A.K. (2019), "CFD simulation of the wind field around pyramidal roofed single-story buildings", SN Appl. Sci., 1(11), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1476-2.
  31. Singh, J. and Roy, A.K. (2019), "Wind pressure coefficients on pyramidal roof of square plan low rise double storey building", Comput. Eng. Phys. Modeling, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22115/cepm.2019.144599.1043.
  32. Taranath, B.S. (2017), Tall Buildings Design: Steel, Concrete, and Composite Systems, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  33. Thordal, M.S., Bennetsen, J.C. and Koss, H.H.H. (2019), "Review for practical application of CFD for the determination of wind load on high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 186, 155-168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.12.019.
  34. Thordal, M.S., Bennetsen, J.C. and Koss, H.H.H. (2019), "Review for practical application of CFD for the determination of wind load on high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 186, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V24P239.
  35. Thordal, M.S., Bennetsen, J.C., Capra, S., Kragh, A.K. and Koss, H.H.H. (2020), "Towards a standard CFD setup for wind load assessment of high-rise buildings: Part 2-Blind test of chamfered and rounded corner high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 205, 104282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104282.