과제정보
이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2019S1A5C2A03083499).
참고문헌
- Ministry of Science and ICT. National Information Society agency (2020). The Report on the Digital Divide (NIA VIII-RSE-C-20074).
- K-indicator (2021.11.14). http://www.index.go.kr/unify
- National Library of Korea (2021.10.25). www.nl.go.kr/
- National Assembly Library (2021.10.25). https://www.nanet.go.kr/main.do
- Kim, Dong-Kwang (2002). Changing relation of science and public: the approaches to public understanding of science(PUS). Journal of Science & Tehnology Studies, 2(2), 1-23.
- Kim, SangMook, Lee, ChangWon, & Han, Seunghwan (2004). Policy process of the central government and citizen participation. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 16(4), 861-885.
- Kim, Seonghee & Park, Hyejin (2014). A study on the quality of academic information service of internet portal. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.079
- Kim, Young-Ki (2007). A study on the influence of factors that makes web sites credible. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(4), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.4.093
- Kim, Young-Ki (2011). Comparative study on criteria for evaluation of internet information. The Journal of Humanities, 27, 87-109.
- Kim, Jeong-Hwan, Kim, Jae-Hoon, & Hwang, Jae-Young (2011). A study on information users' needs and information seeking behavior of doctoral researchers in digital age. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.189
- Noh, Younghee & Oh, Sanghee (2011). An analysis of users' perception of providing CHI services in public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 45-77. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.42.3.201109.45
- Moon, Sin-Yong (2009). E-Governance and online citizen participation in policy process: focusing on the cases of metropolitan governments. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 12(2), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.22896/KARIS.2009.12.2.003
- Bak, Hee-Je (2002). Two approaches to public understanding of science: how survey analyses and constructivist PUS might benefit each other. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2(2), 25-54.
- Bae, Kyung-Jae (2010). The analysis of the differences of information needs and usages among academic users in the field of science and technology. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 44(2), 157-176.
- Sa, Jay-Myung (2006). A study on activation of citizen participation in the policy process. Korean Public Administration and Policy Studies, 4(1), 69-99.
- Yoo, Jae-Won (2003). Establishing citizen participation: from a perspective of participatory democracy. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 7(2), 105-125.
- Yun, Seongyi (2006). Institutionalization of e-participation in the policy making process. Korean Journal of Social Theory, 30, 187-211.
- Lee, Yong-Jae (2012). A study on marketing strategies of public libraries: focused on New York public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4), 113-137. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.113
- Lee, Jeong-Gu, Lee, Myung-Sun, Yang, Hee-Jin, Kim, Chang-Mok, & Kim, Tae-Jung (2006). A study on the information needs and using behavior of science-technology information users of the KISTI. Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 4(2), 95-99.
- Lee, Jiyoung Lee, Kim, Giyeong, & Park, Young-Sook (2016). A study on the categorization of citizens' information needs. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(2), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.2.245
- Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2010). A study on the open access policy to public funded research articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.207
- Korean Standard Classification of Occupations (2018). http://kssc.kostat.go.kr/
- Han, Seung Hee & Lee, Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Proceedings of the 13th Korean Society for Information Management Conference, 17-22.
- Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
- Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009. 7. 1). Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Informal Science. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf
- Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
- Crawford, D. (1986). Meeting scholarly information needs in an automated environment: a humanist's perspective. College & Research Libraries, 47(6), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_06_569
- Durant, J. (1993). What Is Scientific Literacy?. In J. Durant and J. Gregory eds. Science and Culture in Europe. London: Science Museum, 129-138.
- Finke, P. (Ed.). (2015). Freie Burger, freie Forschung: Die Wissenschaft verlasst den Elfenbeinturm. Munich: oekom. 재인용: Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen science in the social sciences: a call for more evidence. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 22-26.
- Fortson, L., Masters, K., Nichol, R., Edmondson, E. M., Lintott, C., Raddick, J., & Wallin, J. (2012). Galaxy zoo: morphological classifiaction and citizen science. Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy, 2012, 213-236.
- George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E. C., St Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly use of information: graduate students' information seeking behaviour. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 11(4), paper 272. Available: http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html
- Heiss, R. & Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen science in the social sciences: a call for more evidence. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
- Lawal, I. (2002). Scholarly communication: the use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2002(Fall).
- Mbabu, L. G., Bertram, A., & Varnum, K. (2013). Patterns of undergraduates' use of scholarly databases in a large research university. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.10.004
- OECD, 2004. Declaration on Access to Research Data From Public Funding.
- RISS (2021.10.23). https://riss.kr/
- Rosenblatt, S. (2010). They can find it but they don't know what to do with it: Describing the use of scholarly literature by undergraduate students. Journal of Information Literacy, 4(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.11645/4.2.1486
- ScienceON (2021.10.23). https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/
- Sondergaard, T. F., Andersen, J., & Hjorland, B. (2003). Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 278-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310472509
- Thomas, G. P. & Durant, J. R. (1987). "Why Should We Promote the Public Understanding of Science?," in M. Shortland (ed.) Scientific Literacy Papers, pp. 1-14. Oxford: Rewley House.
- UNISIST. (1971). Study Report on the Feasibility of a World Science Information System. by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the International Council of Scientitic Unions. Paris: UNESCO.
- Wang, M. L. (2010). Scholarly journal use and reading behavior of social scientists in Taiwan. The International Information & Library Review, 42(4), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2010.10.001
- Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., & Stilgoe, J. (2005). The Public Value Of Science. London: Demos.